Trading traditional knowledge

San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the most controversial aspects of the access and benefit-sharing debate is the way in which traditional knowledge is used and commercialized. Many critics have pointed out the inherent contradictions between traditional knowledge systems, which are typically collective, based on sharing and of a non-barter nature, and Western approaches to knowledge protection such as patenting, which by contrast are monopolistic and individualistic. Few, if any, empirical studies have documented the relationship between these systems and community perceptions of the so-called commodification of traditional knowledge. Based on fieldwork conducted in South Africa, Namibia and Botswana, this chapter examines how these issues are perceived by San communities.
While indigenous peoples are often portrayed in the literature as homogeneous groups voicing uniform opinions, the scenario surveys used in the fieldwork clearly indicate that within the communities studied, there were many different opinions on whether or not to commodify traditional knowledge. This diversity of voices is not surprising when one takes into account the local context or the current and historical socio-economic and political circumstances of individuals and communities.
Although there was widespread acceptance of commodification in principle, it is important to be aware of its cultural, symbolic, and economic value. At the same time, the scenario surveys showed that many respondents wanted to keep control of their knowledge rather than part with it for economic benefit (royalties) only. Notably, a gender divide could be observed, with women more likely to settle for royalties – to finance their children's education, for instance – and men more likely to either reject all commodification or opt to be co-holders of patents.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIndigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing
Subtitle of host publicationLessons Learned from San Hoodia Case
EditorsRachel Wynberg, Doris Schroeder, Roger Chennells
PublisherSpringer
Pages193-209
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9789048131228
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Namibia
Botswana
community
scenario
child education
economic value
patent
economics
critic
finance
acceptance
gender
knowledge
Group

Keywords

  • benefit sharing
  • commodification
  • indigenous communities

Cite this

Vermeylen, S. (2009). Trading traditional knowledge: San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana. In R. Wynberg, D. Schroeder, & R. Chennells (Eds.), Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case (pp. 193-209). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_10
Vermeylen, Saskia. / Trading traditional knowledge : San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana. Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. editor / Rachel Wynberg ; Doris Schroeder ; Roger Chennells. Springer, 2009. pp. 193-209
@inbook{81d5f18e78294088a7132698bfe5393f,
title = "Trading traditional knowledge: San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana",
abstract = "One of the most controversial aspects of the access and benefit-sharing debate is the way in which traditional knowledge is used and commercialized. Many critics have pointed out the inherent contradictions between traditional knowledge systems, which are typically collective, based on sharing and of a non-barter nature, and Western approaches to knowledge protection such as patenting, which by contrast are monopolistic and individualistic. Few, if any, empirical studies have documented the relationship between these systems and community perceptions of the so-called commodification of traditional knowledge. Based on fieldwork conducted in South Africa, Namibia and Botswana, this chapter examines how these issues are perceived by San communities.While indigenous peoples are often portrayed in the literature as homogeneous groups voicing uniform opinions, the scenario surveys used in the fieldwork clearly indicate that within the communities studied, there were many different opinions on whether or not to commodify traditional knowledge. This diversity of voices is not surprising when one takes into account the local context or the current and historical socio-economic and political circumstances of individuals and communities.Although there was widespread acceptance of commodification in principle, it is important to be aware of its cultural, symbolic, and economic value. At the same time, the scenario surveys showed that many respondents wanted to keep control of their knowledge rather than part with it for economic benefit (royalties) only. Notably, a gender divide could be observed, with women more likely to settle for royalties – to finance their children's education, for instance – and men more likely to either reject all commodification or opt to be co-holders of patents.",
keywords = "benefit sharing, commodification, indigenous communities",
author = "Saskia Vermeylen",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789048131228",
pages = "193--209",
editor = "Rachel Wynberg and Doris Schroeder and Roger Chennells",
booktitle = "Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Vermeylen, S 2009, Trading traditional knowledge: San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana. in R Wynberg, D Schroeder & R Chennells (eds), Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. Springer, pp. 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_10

Trading traditional knowledge : San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana. / Vermeylen, Saskia.

Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. ed. / Rachel Wynberg; Doris Schroeder; Roger Chennells. Springer, 2009. p. 193-209.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Trading traditional knowledge

T2 - San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - One of the most controversial aspects of the access and benefit-sharing debate is the way in which traditional knowledge is used and commercialized. Many critics have pointed out the inherent contradictions between traditional knowledge systems, which are typically collective, based on sharing and of a non-barter nature, and Western approaches to knowledge protection such as patenting, which by contrast are monopolistic and individualistic. Few, if any, empirical studies have documented the relationship between these systems and community perceptions of the so-called commodification of traditional knowledge. Based on fieldwork conducted in South Africa, Namibia and Botswana, this chapter examines how these issues are perceived by San communities.While indigenous peoples are often portrayed in the literature as homogeneous groups voicing uniform opinions, the scenario surveys used in the fieldwork clearly indicate that within the communities studied, there were many different opinions on whether or not to commodify traditional knowledge. This diversity of voices is not surprising when one takes into account the local context or the current and historical socio-economic and political circumstances of individuals and communities.Although there was widespread acceptance of commodification in principle, it is important to be aware of its cultural, symbolic, and economic value. At the same time, the scenario surveys showed that many respondents wanted to keep control of their knowledge rather than part with it for economic benefit (royalties) only. Notably, a gender divide could be observed, with women more likely to settle for royalties – to finance their children's education, for instance – and men more likely to either reject all commodification or opt to be co-holders of patents.

AB - One of the most controversial aspects of the access and benefit-sharing debate is the way in which traditional knowledge is used and commercialized. Many critics have pointed out the inherent contradictions between traditional knowledge systems, which are typically collective, based on sharing and of a non-barter nature, and Western approaches to knowledge protection such as patenting, which by contrast are monopolistic and individualistic. Few, if any, empirical studies have documented the relationship between these systems and community perceptions of the so-called commodification of traditional knowledge. Based on fieldwork conducted in South Africa, Namibia and Botswana, this chapter examines how these issues are perceived by San communities.While indigenous peoples are often portrayed in the literature as homogeneous groups voicing uniform opinions, the scenario surveys used in the fieldwork clearly indicate that within the communities studied, there were many different opinions on whether or not to commodify traditional knowledge. This diversity of voices is not surprising when one takes into account the local context or the current and historical socio-economic and political circumstances of individuals and communities.Although there was widespread acceptance of commodification in principle, it is important to be aware of its cultural, symbolic, and economic value. At the same time, the scenario surveys showed that many respondents wanted to keep control of their knowledge rather than part with it for economic benefit (royalties) only. Notably, a gender divide could be observed, with women more likely to settle for royalties – to finance their children's education, for instance – and men more likely to either reject all commodification or opt to be co-holders of patents.

KW - benefit sharing

KW - commodification

KW - indigenous communities

U2 - 10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_10

DO - 10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789048131228

SP - 193

EP - 209

BT - Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing

A2 - Wynberg, Rachel

A2 - Schroeder, Doris

A2 - Chennells, Roger

PB - Springer

ER -

Vermeylen S. Trading traditional knowledge: San perspectives from South Africa, Namibia and Botswana. In Wynberg R, Schroeder D, Chennells R, editors, Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. Springer. 2009. p. 193-209 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_10