Tracking habitus across a transnational professional field

Crawford Spence, Chris Carter, Ataur Belal, Javier Husillos, Claire Drambin, Pablo Archel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)
45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The sociology of the professions has shied away from cross-national comparative work. Yet research in different professional jurisdictions emphasises the transnational nature of professional fields. Further work is therefore needed that explores the extent to which transnational professional fields are characterised by unity or heterogeneity. This article presents the results of a qualitative interrogation of the habitus of partners in ‘Big 4’ professional service firms across, primarily, five countries (Bangladesh, Canada, France, Spain and the UK). Marked differences are observed between the partner habitus in Bangladesh and the rest. In Bangladesh, professional dispositions are closely intertwined with traditional public-interest conceptualisations of professionalism; in the Western countries studied, the habitus is constructed around a more entrepreneurial, profit-seeking conceptualisation of professionalism. These results lead to a view of transnational professional fields as characterised by both unity and heterogeneity, with fundamentally different habitus identifiable only in certain national business systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-20
Number of pages18
JournalWork, Employment and Society
Volume30
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • transnational professional fields
  • professional service firms
  • comparative capitalism
  • developed countries
  • developing countries
  • habitus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Tracking habitus across a transnational professional field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Spence, C., Carter, C., Belal, A., Husillos, J., Drambin, C., & Archel, P. (2016). Tracking habitus across a transnational professional field. Work, Employment and Society, 30(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015574824