Towards a postcolonial and decolonising educational administration history

Eugenie Samier*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the increasing postcolonial and decolonising literature as it relates to non-Western countries and the history of their educational systems undergoing internationalisation and globalisation. The first section reviews a number of historiographical developments in the twentieth century that laid a foundation for a more cultural and global view and to include marginalised populations. The second section examines the critiques of educational history from postcolonial and decolonising perspectives, and the colonisation of mind critiques, including the recent indigenous research methodology movement. The third section explores two main challenges for the field of educational administration history are discussed: developing ways of understanding countries that operate under very different paradigms than Western states, and which are undergoing societal changes and stresses that Western states are not experiencing; and a revised research and methodology that captures problems of recolonisation/neoimperialism, the subaltern personality, and struggles to maintain indigenous cultures and roles. In order to respond to these conditions, educational administration, like other fields has to generate new models, theories, and modes of practice that derive from the conditions that postcolonial developing states face including identity formation, values, role construction and institutional arrangements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-282
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Educational Administration and History
Volume49
Issue number4
Early online date4 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • colonisation of mind
  • decolonisation
  • Postcolonialism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a postcolonial and decolonising educational administration history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this