Towards a framework to understand purpose in Futures Studies

the role of Vickers appreciative system

George Burt, Kees van der Heijden

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There have been comments recently about the efficacy of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, relating to confusion on knowledge aggregation and methodology, which can be summarised in the question: 'how to determine the purpose of such projects'. The lack of a purpose framework makes it difficult for 'clients' initiating such projects to determine if outcomes meet their original expectations. This paper proposes a framework to help understand the nature, objective and purpose of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, which we will argue helps to overcome these concerns. The proposed framework is based on Vickers' definition of an Appreciative System, highlighting how decision making involves three areas of judgment - reality judgment, value judgment, and instrumental judgment. It will be argued that decision-makers and policymakers call for Futures Studies projects when they become aware of an organizational deficiency in one or more of these areas. Each element, alone or in combination, could form the basis of a purpose definition for a Futures Studies project, and, therefore, needs to be considered to ensure that the project meets client expectations and is experienced as purposeful and rewarding. The paper elaborates on each of the three elements, and then discusses their integrated nature. This is followed by a discussion of the implications of Appreciative System theory for three key players in the decision making process, the organizational leadership, the professionals and the organization at large involved in the practice of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1109-1127
    Number of pages19
    JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
    Volume75
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

    Fingerprint

    Planning
    Decision making
    Organizational Decision Making
    System theory
    Systems Theory
    Confusion
    Agglomeration
    Decision Making
    Appreciative system
    future studies
    Scenario planning
    Nature

    Keywords

    • Vickers
    • appreciative system
    • Futures Studies
    • purpose
    • scenario planning
    • reality judgments
    • value judgments
    • instrumental judgments

    Cite this

    @article{fd56b8b62911440593b22f4d2ea2fabd,
    title = "Towards a framework to understand purpose in Futures Studies: the role of Vickers appreciative system",
    abstract = "There have been comments recently about the efficacy of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, relating to confusion on knowledge aggregation and methodology, which can be summarised in the question: 'how to determine the purpose of such projects'. The lack of a purpose framework makes it difficult for 'clients' initiating such projects to determine if outcomes meet their original expectations. This paper proposes a framework to help understand the nature, objective and purpose of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, which we will argue helps to overcome these concerns. The proposed framework is based on Vickers' definition of an Appreciative System, highlighting how decision making involves three areas of judgment - reality judgment, value judgment, and instrumental judgment. It will be argued that decision-makers and policymakers call for Futures Studies projects when they become aware of an organizational deficiency in one or more of these areas. Each element, alone or in combination, could form the basis of a purpose definition for a Futures Studies project, and, therefore, needs to be considered to ensure that the project meets client expectations and is experienced as purposeful and rewarding. The paper elaborates on each of the three elements, and then discusses their integrated nature. This is followed by a discussion of the implications of Appreciative System theory for three key players in the decision making process, the organizational leadership, the professionals and the organization at large involved in the practice of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects.",
    keywords = "Vickers, appreciative system, Futures Studies, purpose, scenario planning, reality judgments, value judgments, instrumental judgments",
    author = "George Burt and {van der Heijden}, Kees",
    year = "2008",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "75",
    pages = "1109--1127",
    journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
    issn = "0040-1625",
    number = "8",

    }

    Towards a framework to understand purpose in Futures Studies : the role of Vickers appreciative system. / Burt, George; van der Heijden, Kees.

    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 75, No. 8, 10.2008, p. 1109-1127.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Towards a framework to understand purpose in Futures Studies

    T2 - the role of Vickers appreciative system

    AU - Burt, George

    AU - van der Heijden, Kees

    PY - 2008/10

    Y1 - 2008/10

    N2 - There have been comments recently about the efficacy of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, relating to confusion on knowledge aggregation and methodology, which can be summarised in the question: 'how to determine the purpose of such projects'. The lack of a purpose framework makes it difficult for 'clients' initiating such projects to determine if outcomes meet their original expectations. This paper proposes a framework to help understand the nature, objective and purpose of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, which we will argue helps to overcome these concerns. The proposed framework is based on Vickers' definition of an Appreciative System, highlighting how decision making involves three areas of judgment - reality judgment, value judgment, and instrumental judgment. It will be argued that decision-makers and policymakers call for Futures Studies projects when they become aware of an organizational deficiency in one or more of these areas. Each element, alone or in combination, could form the basis of a purpose definition for a Futures Studies project, and, therefore, needs to be considered to ensure that the project meets client expectations and is experienced as purposeful and rewarding. The paper elaborates on each of the three elements, and then discusses their integrated nature. This is followed by a discussion of the implications of Appreciative System theory for three key players in the decision making process, the organizational leadership, the professionals and the organization at large involved in the practice of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects.

    AB - There have been comments recently about the efficacy of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, relating to confusion on knowledge aggregation and methodology, which can be summarised in the question: 'how to determine the purpose of such projects'. The lack of a purpose framework makes it difficult for 'clients' initiating such projects to determine if outcomes meet their original expectations. This paper proposes a framework to help understand the nature, objective and purpose of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects, which we will argue helps to overcome these concerns. The proposed framework is based on Vickers' definition of an Appreciative System, highlighting how decision making involves three areas of judgment - reality judgment, value judgment, and instrumental judgment. It will be argued that decision-makers and policymakers call for Futures Studies projects when they become aware of an organizational deficiency in one or more of these areas. Each element, alone or in combination, could form the basis of a purpose definition for a Futures Studies project, and, therefore, needs to be considered to ensure that the project meets client expectations and is experienced as purposeful and rewarding. The paper elaborates on each of the three elements, and then discusses their integrated nature. This is followed by a discussion of the implications of Appreciative System theory for three key players in the decision making process, the organizational leadership, the professionals and the organization at large involved in the practice of Futures Studies (and scenario planning) projects.

    KW - Vickers

    KW - appreciative system

    KW - Futures Studies

    KW - purpose

    KW - scenario planning

    KW - reality judgments

    KW - value judgments

    KW - instrumental judgments

    UR - http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505740/description#description

    U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 75

    SP - 1109

    EP - 1127

    JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    SN - 0040-1625

    IS - 8

    ER -