Tourism development and contested communities

the issue of Belfast, Northern Ireland

S. Causevic, P.A. Lynch

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Dark tourism is defined as "visitation to places where tragedies or historically noteworthy death has occurred and that continue to impact our lives" Tarlow, 2005:48). Inherently, dark tourism conceptualises the consequence of a long-term conflict. This paper addresses the area of dark tourism in this context, an area which has received relatively little attention by scholars so far, focusing on its relevance to social reconcilation and urban regeneration in a re-emerging tourism economy in Belfast, Northern Ireland. The fieldwork follows a qualitative methodological approach required in order to gather complex information concerning the issue of dark tourism in a post-conflict society. It involves in-depth interviews with tourism decison makers and tour providers as well as participant observation of the tours and sites in Northern Ireland. Dark tourism, as an academic concept ascription rarely enjoys suport from governing bodies, official tourism associations and local communities in each specific society. This research points to a polarised understanding of the concept between academic and developed socities on one side, and tourism destination stakeholders on the other, who assess the concept as being detrimental in the process of destination-image-formation which tends to occur after a politcal conflict. Exluding a small niche segnment, this study finds that, in actual fact, dark tourism is not a motivator for visiting the destinations. Yet once tourist are there, most of them would pay a visit to dark tourism sites. Therefore, dark tourism is not a part of the process of image-formation after a conflict. The study instead suggests "phoenix tourism" as an image formation tool, going on to argue that phoenix tourism is not a tourism niche by itself. Phoenix tourism signifies a process of rebuilding, remaking and reconciliation in a post-conflict setting with dark tourism forming a part of that process.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEspacesTemps
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Tourism
    community
    participant observation
    reconciliation
    tourist
    stakeholder
    death

    Keywords

    • dark tourism
    • phoenix tourism
    • post-conflict setting
    • qualitative research
    • tourism

    Cite this

    @article{585d7844be224d7ba2a1d1c242ed38b8,
    title = "Tourism development and contested communities: the issue of Belfast, Northern Ireland",
    abstract = "Dark tourism is defined as {"}visitation to places where tragedies or historically noteworthy death has occurred and that continue to impact our lives{"} Tarlow, 2005:48). Inherently, dark tourism conceptualises the consequence of a long-term conflict. This paper addresses the area of dark tourism in this context, an area which has received relatively little attention by scholars so far, focusing on its relevance to social reconcilation and urban regeneration in a re-emerging tourism economy in Belfast, Northern Ireland. The fieldwork follows a qualitative methodological approach required in order to gather complex information concerning the issue of dark tourism in a post-conflict society. It involves in-depth interviews with tourism decison makers and tour providers as well as participant observation of the tours and sites in Northern Ireland. Dark tourism, as an academic concept ascription rarely enjoys suport from governing bodies, official tourism associations and local communities in each specific society. This research points to a polarised understanding of the concept between academic and developed socities on one side, and tourism destination stakeholders on the other, who assess the concept as being detrimental in the process of destination-image-formation which tends to occur after a politcal conflict. Exluding a small niche segnment, this study finds that, in actual fact, dark tourism is not a motivator for visiting the destinations. Yet once tourist are there, most of them would pay a visit to dark tourism sites. Therefore, dark tourism is not a part of the process of image-formation after a conflict. The study instead suggests {"}phoenix tourism{"} as an image formation tool, going on to argue that phoenix tourism is not a tourism niche by itself. Phoenix tourism signifies a process of rebuilding, remaking and reconciliation in a post-conflict setting with dark tourism forming a part of that process.",
    keywords = "dark tourism, phoenix tourism, post-conflict setting, qualitative research, tourism",
    author = "S. Causevic and P.A. Lynch",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English",
    journal = "EspacesTemps",
    issn = "1777-5477",

    }

    Tourism development and contested communities : the issue of Belfast, Northern Ireland. / Causevic, S.; Lynch, P.A.

    In: EspacesTemps, 2008.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Tourism development and contested communities

    T2 - the issue of Belfast, Northern Ireland

    AU - Causevic, S.

    AU - Lynch, P.A.

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Dark tourism is defined as "visitation to places where tragedies or historically noteworthy death has occurred and that continue to impact our lives" Tarlow, 2005:48). Inherently, dark tourism conceptualises the consequence of a long-term conflict. This paper addresses the area of dark tourism in this context, an area which has received relatively little attention by scholars so far, focusing on its relevance to social reconcilation and urban regeneration in a re-emerging tourism economy in Belfast, Northern Ireland. The fieldwork follows a qualitative methodological approach required in order to gather complex information concerning the issue of dark tourism in a post-conflict society. It involves in-depth interviews with tourism decison makers and tour providers as well as participant observation of the tours and sites in Northern Ireland. Dark tourism, as an academic concept ascription rarely enjoys suport from governing bodies, official tourism associations and local communities in each specific society. This research points to a polarised understanding of the concept between academic and developed socities on one side, and tourism destination stakeholders on the other, who assess the concept as being detrimental in the process of destination-image-formation which tends to occur after a politcal conflict. Exluding a small niche segnment, this study finds that, in actual fact, dark tourism is not a motivator for visiting the destinations. Yet once tourist are there, most of them would pay a visit to dark tourism sites. Therefore, dark tourism is not a part of the process of image-formation after a conflict. The study instead suggests "phoenix tourism" as an image formation tool, going on to argue that phoenix tourism is not a tourism niche by itself. Phoenix tourism signifies a process of rebuilding, remaking and reconciliation in a post-conflict setting with dark tourism forming a part of that process.

    AB - Dark tourism is defined as "visitation to places where tragedies or historically noteworthy death has occurred and that continue to impact our lives" Tarlow, 2005:48). Inherently, dark tourism conceptualises the consequence of a long-term conflict. This paper addresses the area of dark tourism in this context, an area which has received relatively little attention by scholars so far, focusing on its relevance to social reconcilation and urban regeneration in a re-emerging tourism economy in Belfast, Northern Ireland. The fieldwork follows a qualitative methodological approach required in order to gather complex information concerning the issue of dark tourism in a post-conflict society. It involves in-depth interviews with tourism decison makers and tour providers as well as participant observation of the tours and sites in Northern Ireland. Dark tourism, as an academic concept ascription rarely enjoys suport from governing bodies, official tourism associations and local communities in each specific society. This research points to a polarised understanding of the concept between academic and developed socities on one side, and tourism destination stakeholders on the other, who assess the concept as being detrimental in the process of destination-image-formation which tends to occur after a politcal conflict. Exluding a small niche segnment, this study finds that, in actual fact, dark tourism is not a motivator for visiting the destinations. Yet once tourist are there, most of them would pay a visit to dark tourism sites. Therefore, dark tourism is not a part of the process of image-formation after a conflict. The study instead suggests "phoenix tourism" as an image formation tool, going on to argue that phoenix tourism is not a tourism niche by itself. Phoenix tourism signifies a process of rebuilding, remaking and reconciliation in a post-conflict setting with dark tourism forming a part of that process.

    KW - dark tourism

    KW - phoenix tourism

    KW - post-conflict setting

    KW - qualitative research

    KW - tourism

    UR - https://www.espacestemps.net/articles/tourism-development-and-contested-communities/

    M3 - Article

    JO - EspacesTemps

    JF - EspacesTemps

    SN - 1777-5477

    ER -