Abstract
In recent years, there has been a surge in production of high-strength steel (HSS) due to market demand. Application of HSS has increased in the field of construction and heavy industrial equipment in order to optimise the product weight, with a focus on sustainability. An important feature is that HSS has higher yield strength than conventional structural steels, but lower ductility. Based on this, it is often assumed that HSS would perform better in terms of fatigue strength. However, this assumption requires additional validation considering manufacturing and environmental effects, where higher ductility would be more beneficial. This paper discusses the comparative analysis of the total fatigue life assessment of different steel grades (from low to high) assuming crack initiation and crack propagation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 650-659 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Procedia Structural Integrity |
| Volume | 75 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Dec 2025 |
| Event | Fatigue Design 2025: FD2025 - CETIM, Senlis, France Duration: 19 Nov 2025 → 20 Nov 2025 |
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge the support for this study, which was provided by the Weir Group PLC (WARC2011-SAA1, 2011) via its establishment of the Weir Advanced Research Centre (WARC) at the University of Strathclyde
Keywords
- high strength steels
- very high cycle fatigue
- ultrasonic fatigue testing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Total fatigue life testing of high strength steels and conventional steels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver