'Too much on the Highlands?'

recasting the economic history of the Highlands and Islands

Andrew Perchard, Niall MacKenzie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article seeks to open a new debate on the history of the evolution of the economies of the Highlands and Islands. In the process, it explores the underlying reasons for the neglect of this area and argues for a thorough examination of economic activity in the region through an historical lens, underpinned by conceptual frameworks. For the purposes of this essay, the focus is on the seven crofting counties, rather than northern Scotland as a whole. The rationale for this is to address some of the arguments advanced about Highland exceptionalism, including discussion of the influence of crofting and the associated factors on the development of both the literature and policy on the region. It also allows for comparisons to be drawn to other geographically peripheral areas, and their relationships with the ‘core’, including the Canadian Maritimes, the Italian south, and parts of Norway. However, the article’s main intention is to draw out connections with other parts of the Scottish and UK economies in order to situate the region within the appropriate context. Though this article focuses principally on the period from the nineteenth through the twenty-first centuries, it does address itself to some of the arguments made for the Highlands between 1750 and 1841. A key intention then is to give some insight into economic diversification within the region, both before and after substantial state intervention. The importance of this lies not only in revisiting a crucial aspect of Highland and Scottish history, but also in exploring current and future economic policy for the Highlands and Islands, and other peripheral regions,
in view of the influence of history on public debates and policy-making. In a recent critique of ‘New Economic Geography’, Garretson and Martin observe that the ‘actual history of economic landscapes’, as opposed to a pre-determined ‘set of possible equilibrium economic landscapes’ – or put differently, the ‘real’ as opposed to ‘model world’ – is crucial to determining more representative models. This is made all the more important given both the traditional neglect of historical perspectives in policy formulation, and the growing recognition of its importance in ‘policy science’.7 In this respect, the Highlands offers an appropriate example to analyse with its experience of a variety of different approaches to economic development ranging from direct state intervention to the hands-off approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalNorthern Scotland
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

economic history
history
economics
neglect
peripheral region
economic geography
historical perspective
economic policy
conceptual framework
policy making
economic activity
economy
economic development
Economic Policy
Norway
Economic History
Highlands
Economic history
examination
policy

Keywords

  • regional development
  • highlands
  • economic history
  • islands

Cite this

@article{b50b710c4b7341d6a49ebce3dbf5cb55,
title = "'Too much on the Highlands?': recasting the economic history of the Highlands and Islands",
abstract = "This article seeks to open a new debate on the history of the evolution of the economies of the Highlands and Islands. In the process, it explores the underlying reasons for the neglect of this area and argues for a thorough examination of economic activity in the region through an historical lens, underpinned by conceptual frameworks. For the purposes of this essay, the focus is on the seven crofting counties, rather than northern Scotland as a whole. The rationale for this is to address some of the arguments advanced about Highland exceptionalism, including discussion of the influence of crofting and the associated factors on the development of both the literature and policy on the region. It also allows for comparisons to be drawn to other geographically peripheral areas, and their relationships with the ‘core’, including the Canadian Maritimes, the Italian south, and parts of Norway. However, the article’s main intention is to draw out connections with other parts of the Scottish and UK economies in order to situate the region within the appropriate context. Though this article focuses principally on the period from the nineteenth through the twenty-first centuries, it does address itself to some of the arguments made for the Highlands between 1750 and 1841. A key intention then is to give some insight into economic diversification within the region, both before and after substantial state intervention. The importance of this lies not only in revisiting a crucial aspect of Highland and Scottish history, but also in exploring current and future economic policy for the Highlands and Islands, and other peripheral regions,in view of the influence of history on public debates and policy-making. In a recent critique of ‘New Economic Geography’, Garretson and Martin observe that the ‘actual history of economic landscapes’, as opposed to a pre-determined ‘set of possible equilibrium economic landscapes’ – or put differently, the ‘real’ as opposed to ‘model world’ – is crucial to determining more representative models. This is made all the more important given both the traditional neglect of historical perspectives in policy formulation, and the growing recognition of its importance in ‘policy science’.7 In this respect, the Highlands offers an appropriate example to analyse with its experience of a variety of different approaches to economic development ranging from direct state intervention to the hands-off approach.",
keywords = "regional development, highlands , economic history , islands",
author = "Andrew Perchard and Niall MacKenzie",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3366/nor.2013.0049",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "3--22",
journal = "Northern Scotland",
issn = "0306-5278",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

}

'Too much on the Highlands?' : recasting the economic history of the Highlands and Islands. / Perchard, Andrew; MacKenzie, Niall.

In: Northern Scotland, Vol. 4, 05.2013, p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Too much on the Highlands?'

T2 - recasting the economic history of the Highlands and Islands

AU - Perchard, Andrew

AU - MacKenzie, Niall

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - This article seeks to open a new debate on the history of the evolution of the economies of the Highlands and Islands. In the process, it explores the underlying reasons for the neglect of this area and argues for a thorough examination of economic activity in the region through an historical lens, underpinned by conceptual frameworks. For the purposes of this essay, the focus is on the seven crofting counties, rather than northern Scotland as a whole. The rationale for this is to address some of the arguments advanced about Highland exceptionalism, including discussion of the influence of crofting and the associated factors on the development of both the literature and policy on the region. It also allows for comparisons to be drawn to other geographically peripheral areas, and their relationships with the ‘core’, including the Canadian Maritimes, the Italian south, and parts of Norway. However, the article’s main intention is to draw out connections with other parts of the Scottish and UK economies in order to situate the region within the appropriate context. Though this article focuses principally on the period from the nineteenth through the twenty-first centuries, it does address itself to some of the arguments made for the Highlands between 1750 and 1841. A key intention then is to give some insight into economic diversification within the region, both before and after substantial state intervention. The importance of this lies not only in revisiting a crucial aspect of Highland and Scottish history, but also in exploring current and future economic policy for the Highlands and Islands, and other peripheral regions,in view of the influence of history on public debates and policy-making. In a recent critique of ‘New Economic Geography’, Garretson and Martin observe that the ‘actual history of economic landscapes’, as opposed to a pre-determined ‘set of possible equilibrium economic landscapes’ – or put differently, the ‘real’ as opposed to ‘model world’ – is crucial to determining more representative models. This is made all the more important given both the traditional neglect of historical perspectives in policy formulation, and the growing recognition of its importance in ‘policy science’.7 In this respect, the Highlands offers an appropriate example to analyse with its experience of a variety of different approaches to economic development ranging from direct state intervention to the hands-off approach.

AB - This article seeks to open a new debate on the history of the evolution of the economies of the Highlands and Islands. In the process, it explores the underlying reasons for the neglect of this area and argues for a thorough examination of economic activity in the region through an historical lens, underpinned by conceptual frameworks. For the purposes of this essay, the focus is on the seven crofting counties, rather than northern Scotland as a whole. The rationale for this is to address some of the arguments advanced about Highland exceptionalism, including discussion of the influence of crofting and the associated factors on the development of both the literature and policy on the region. It also allows for comparisons to be drawn to other geographically peripheral areas, and their relationships with the ‘core’, including the Canadian Maritimes, the Italian south, and parts of Norway. However, the article’s main intention is to draw out connections with other parts of the Scottish and UK economies in order to situate the region within the appropriate context. Though this article focuses principally on the period from the nineteenth through the twenty-first centuries, it does address itself to some of the arguments made for the Highlands between 1750 and 1841. A key intention then is to give some insight into economic diversification within the region, both before and after substantial state intervention. The importance of this lies not only in revisiting a crucial aspect of Highland and Scottish history, but also in exploring current and future economic policy for the Highlands and Islands, and other peripheral regions,in view of the influence of history on public debates and policy-making. In a recent critique of ‘New Economic Geography’, Garretson and Martin observe that the ‘actual history of economic landscapes’, as opposed to a pre-determined ‘set of possible equilibrium economic landscapes’ – or put differently, the ‘real’ as opposed to ‘model world’ – is crucial to determining more representative models. This is made all the more important given both the traditional neglect of historical perspectives in policy formulation, and the growing recognition of its importance in ‘policy science’.7 In this respect, the Highlands offers an appropriate example to analyse with its experience of a variety of different approaches to economic development ranging from direct state intervention to the hands-off approach.

KW - regional development

KW - highlands

KW - economic history

KW - islands

UR - http://www.euppublishing.com/journal/nor

U2 - 10.3366/nor.2013.0049

DO - 10.3366/nor.2013.0049

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 3

EP - 22

JO - Northern Scotland

JF - Northern Scotland

SN - 0306-5278

ER -