Time, fear and suffering in post-dualist states of being

P.A. McInnes, P.N.H. Beech

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article seeks to contribute to debates on the nature and implications of post-dualist modes of being by drawing upon the 'process philosopher'/'guru' Krishnamurti, whose refusal to be categorised we read as an overtly political move. Advocates of post-dualism have argued for the possibility of a new form of subjectivity that can transcend the problematics of current forms of life, particularly the relationship between individual and social structure. Critics on the other hand have called for an account of the approach one might take to achieve and sustain such a state. This paper seeks to respond to both of these positions. Firstly, in response to critics, it argues that the cumulative and directional assumptions of the journey metaphor embedded in their call are a central obstacle to post-dualist experience. That is, the dualistic separation of self through time as a current, relatively stable, self moving to a future desired self prevents our experience of transcendence in the here and now. However, we argue that a sustained postdualist experience is a rarity and that practices required to experience post-dualism will involve dealing with the fear and suffering usually diverted by the separation of self through time. We employ illustrations drawn from research into workplace identity to highlight the potential dysfunction in removing the journey from people's narratives of self.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages53-67
    Number of pages14
    JournalEphemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    anxiety
    critic
    experience
    transcendence
    social structure
    subjectivity
    metaphor
    workplace
    narrative
    time

    Keywords

    • post-dualist modes of being
    • modes of being
    • Krishnamurti
    • post-dualism

    Cite this

    @article{c676cf257eaa49cf84884280142a2e2e,
    title = "Time, fear and suffering in post-dualist states of being",
    abstract = "This article seeks to contribute to debates on the nature and implications of post-dualist modes of being by drawing upon the 'process philosopher'/'guru' Krishnamurti, whose refusal to be categorised we read as an overtly political move. Advocates of post-dualism have argued for the possibility of a new form of subjectivity that can transcend the problematics of current forms of life, particularly the relationship between individual and social structure. Critics on the other hand have called for an account of the approach one might take to achieve and sustain such a state. This paper seeks to respond to both of these positions. Firstly, in response to critics, it argues that the cumulative and directional assumptions of the journey metaphor embedded in their call are a central obstacle to post-dualist experience. That is, the dualistic separation of self through time as a current, relatively stable, self moving to a future desired self prevents our experience of transcendence in the here and now. However, we argue that a sustained postdualist experience is a rarity and that practices required to experience post-dualism will involve dealing with the fear and suffering usually diverted by the separation of self through time. We employ illustrations drawn from research into workplace identity to highlight the potential dysfunction in removing the journey from people's narratives of self.",
    keywords = "post-dualist modes of being, modes of being, Krishnamurti, post-dualism",
    author = "P.A. McInnes and P.N.H. Beech",
    year = "2005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "53--67",
    journal = "Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization",
    issn = "1473-2866",
    number = "1",

    }

    Time, fear and suffering in post-dualist states of being. / McInnes, P.A.; Beech, P.N.H.

    In: Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2005, p. 53-67.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Time, fear and suffering in post-dualist states of being

    AU - McInnes, P.A.

    AU - Beech, P.N.H.

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - This article seeks to contribute to debates on the nature and implications of post-dualist modes of being by drawing upon the 'process philosopher'/'guru' Krishnamurti, whose refusal to be categorised we read as an overtly political move. Advocates of post-dualism have argued for the possibility of a new form of subjectivity that can transcend the problematics of current forms of life, particularly the relationship between individual and social structure. Critics on the other hand have called for an account of the approach one might take to achieve and sustain such a state. This paper seeks to respond to both of these positions. Firstly, in response to critics, it argues that the cumulative and directional assumptions of the journey metaphor embedded in their call are a central obstacle to post-dualist experience. That is, the dualistic separation of self through time as a current, relatively stable, self moving to a future desired self prevents our experience of transcendence in the here and now. However, we argue that a sustained postdualist experience is a rarity and that practices required to experience post-dualism will involve dealing with the fear and suffering usually diverted by the separation of self through time. We employ illustrations drawn from research into workplace identity to highlight the potential dysfunction in removing the journey from people's narratives of self.

    AB - This article seeks to contribute to debates on the nature and implications of post-dualist modes of being by drawing upon the 'process philosopher'/'guru' Krishnamurti, whose refusal to be categorised we read as an overtly political move. Advocates of post-dualism have argued for the possibility of a new form of subjectivity that can transcend the problematics of current forms of life, particularly the relationship between individual and social structure. Critics on the other hand have called for an account of the approach one might take to achieve and sustain such a state. This paper seeks to respond to both of these positions. Firstly, in response to critics, it argues that the cumulative and directional assumptions of the journey metaphor embedded in their call are a central obstacle to post-dualist experience. That is, the dualistic separation of self through time as a current, relatively stable, self moving to a future desired self prevents our experience of transcendence in the here and now. However, we argue that a sustained postdualist experience is a rarity and that practices required to experience post-dualism will involve dealing with the fear and suffering usually diverted by the separation of self through time. We employ illustrations drawn from research into workplace identity to highlight the potential dysfunction in removing the journey from people's narratives of self.

    KW - post-dualist modes of being

    KW - modes of being

    KW - Krishnamurti

    KW - post-dualism

    UR - http://www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/5-1/5-1index.htm

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 53

    EP - 67

    JO - Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization

    T2 - Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization

    JF - Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization

    SN - 1473-2866

    IS - 1

    ER -