Tigger paper: integration

Michael Angus, CEBE (Funder)

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The process of architecture will always be holistic. As long as it is taught in segments, its educational structure will always run the risk of failing to meet this primary educational aim, and be continually shooting itself in the foot. The pedagogical and professional advantage to breaking the perceived lack of integration between studio and subject classes is I believe a fundamental imperative, to recognise that every part of the architectural process is not in contradiction but has equal value, and to realise the added value that integration would bring to all parts of the educational process, to staff and student alike.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-4
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 2003
EventStudio Culture - Who Needs it? A Conference for Teachers in Schools of Architecture and Landscape - Oxford, UK
Duration: 17 Dec 200318 Dec 2003

Conference

ConferenceStudio Culture - Who Needs it? A Conference for Teachers in Schools of Architecture and Landscape
CityOxford, UK
Period17/12/0318/12/03

Keywords

  • teaching
  • architecture studies
  • architecture education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Tigger paper: integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Angus, M., & CEBE (Funder) (2003). Tigger paper: integration. 1-4. Paper presented at Studio Culture - Who Needs it? A Conference for Teachers in Schools of Architecture and Landscape, Oxford, UK, .