'This is what democracy looks like': New Labour's blind spot and peripheral vision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

New Labour in government since 1997 has been roundly criticized for not possessing a clear, coherent and consistent democratic vision. The absence of such a grand vision has resulted, from this critical perspective, in an absence of 'joined-up' thinking about democracy in an evolving multi-level state. Tensions have been all too apparent between the government's desire to exert central direction - manifested in its most pathological form as 'control freakery' - and its democratising initiatives derived from 'third-way' obsessions with 'decentralising', 'empowering' and 'enabling'. The purpose of this article is to examine why New Labour displayed such apparently impaired democratic vision and why it appeared incapable of conceiving of democratic reform 'in the round'. This article seeks to explain these apparent paradoxes, however, through utilising the notion of 'macular degeneration'. In this analysis, the perceived democratic blind spot of New Labour at Westminster is connected to a democratic peripheral vision, which has envisaged innovative participatory and decentred initiatives in governance beyond Westminster.
LanguageEnglish
Pages367-396
Number of pages30
JournalBritish Politics
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

New Labour
democracy
Third Way
governance
reform
Peripheral Vision
Labor
Democracy
Government
Westminster

Keywords

  • british politics
  • devolution
  • executive-legislative relations
  • parliamentary democracy
  • participation
  • westminster model
  • new labour

Cite this

@article{d74bc14b36f0467ca83ba6d7469a4ef1,
title = "'This is what democracy looks like': New Labour's blind spot and peripheral vision",
abstract = "New Labour in government since 1997 has been roundly criticized for not possessing a clear, coherent and consistent democratic vision. The absence of such a grand vision has resulted, from this critical perspective, in an absence of 'joined-up' thinking about democracy in an evolving multi-level state. Tensions have been all too apparent between the government's desire to exert central direction - manifested in its most pathological form as 'control freakery' - and its democratising initiatives derived from 'third-way' obsessions with 'decentralising', 'empowering' and 'enabling'. The purpose of this article is to examine why New Labour displayed such apparently impaired democratic vision and why it appeared incapable of conceiving of democratic reform 'in the round'. This article seeks to explain these apparent paradoxes, however, through utilising the notion of 'macular degeneration'. In this analysis, the perceived democratic blind spot of New Labour at Westminster is connected to a democratic peripheral vision, which has envisaged innovative participatory and decentred initiatives in governance beyond Westminster.",
keywords = "british politics, devolution, executive-legislative relations, parliamentary democracy, participation, westminster model, new labour",
author = "David Judge",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200028",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "367--396",
journal = "British Politics",
issn = "1746-918X",
number = "3",

}

'This is what democracy looks like' : New Labour's blind spot and peripheral vision. / Judge, David.

In: British Politics, Vol. 1, No. 3, 11.2006, p. 367-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'This is what democracy looks like'

T2 - British Politics

AU - Judge, David

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - New Labour in government since 1997 has been roundly criticized for not possessing a clear, coherent and consistent democratic vision. The absence of such a grand vision has resulted, from this critical perspective, in an absence of 'joined-up' thinking about democracy in an evolving multi-level state. Tensions have been all too apparent between the government's desire to exert central direction - manifested in its most pathological form as 'control freakery' - and its democratising initiatives derived from 'third-way' obsessions with 'decentralising', 'empowering' and 'enabling'. The purpose of this article is to examine why New Labour displayed such apparently impaired democratic vision and why it appeared incapable of conceiving of democratic reform 'in the round'. This article seeks to explain these apparent paradoxes, however, through utilising the notion of 'macular degeneration'. In this analysis, the perceived democratic blind spot of New Labour at Westminster is connected to a democratic peripheral vision, which has envisaged innovative participatory and decentred initiatives in governance beyond Westminster.

AB - New Labour in government since 1997 has been roundly criticized for not possessing a clear, coherent and consistent democratic vision. The absence of such a grand vision has resulted, from this critical perspective, in an absence of 'joined-up' thinking about democracy in an evolving multi-level state. Tensions have been all too apparent between the government's desire to exert central direction - manifested in its most pathological form as 'control freakery' - and its democratising initiatives derived from 'third-way' obsessions with 'decentralising', 'empowering' and 'enabling'. The purpose of this article is to examine why New Labour displayed such apparently impaired democratic vision and why it appeared incapable of conceiving of democratic reform 'in the round'. This article seeks to explain these apparent paradoxes, however, through utilising the notion of 'macular degeneration'. In this analysis, the perceived democratic blind spot of New Labour at Westminster is connected to a democratic peripheral vision, which has envisaged innovative participatory and decentred initiatives in governance beyond Westminster.

KW - british politics

KW - devolution

KW - executive-legislative relations

KW - parliamentary democracy

KW - participation

KW - westminster model

KW - new labour

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200028

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200028

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 367

EP - 396

JO - British Politics

JF - British Politics

SN - 1746-918X

IS - 3

ER -