'This is what democracy looks like': New Labour's blind spot and peripheral vision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
678 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

New Labour in government since 1997 has been roundly criticized for not possessing a clear, coherent and consistent democratic vision. The absence of such a grand vision has resulted, from this critical perspective, in an absence of 'joined-up' thinking about democracy in an evolving multi-level state. Tensions have been all too apparent between the government's desire to exert central direction - manifested in its most pathological form as 'control freakery' - and its democratising initiatives derived from 'third-way' obsessions with 'decentralising', 'empowering' and 'enabling'. The purpose of this article is to examine why New Labour displayed such apparently impaired democratic vision and why it appeared incapable of conceiving of democratic reform 'in the round'. This article seeks to explain these apparent paradoxes, however, through utilising the notion of 'macular degeneration'. In this analysis, the perceived democratic blind spot of New Labour at Westminster is connected to a democratic peripheral vision, which has envisaged innovative participatory and decentred initiatives in governance beyond Westminster.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-396
Number of pages30
JournalBritish Politics
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • british politics
  • devolution
  • executive-legislative relations
  • parliamentary democracy
  • participation
  • westminster model
  • new labour

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''This is what democracy looks like': New Labour's blind spot and peripheral vision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this