'Therapy means change, not peanut butter': radical psychiatry in the United States, 1967-1975

Lucas Richert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As early as the 1950s, the profession of psychiatry in the United States began to experience a series of subtle adjustments. By the mid-1960s, the American Psychiatric Association was gripped and bound by the larger social, economic and political trends of the era. Widespread political activist movements focused on the Vietnam War, civil rights for blacks, and the elevation of feminism. Amid this contentious, transitional climate, factions in the field of mental health deliberated over best practices as well as broader questions of modernisation, scientific legitimacy and human rights. The Radical Caucus of the American Psychiatric Association was one such faction. It included black and women's wings and challenged other members of the APA to embrace the transformative zeitgeist of the 1960s, as well as connect these tenets to the practice of psychiatry. This paper offers a snapshot of an important period in the history of American psychiatry, politics, and culture.
LanguageEnglish
Pages104-121
Number of pages18
JournalSocial History of Medicine
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date11 Oct 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Butter
Psychiatry
Feminism
Social Adjustment
Illegitimacy
Civil Rights
Vietnam
Politics
Social Change
Climate
Practice Guidelines
Mental Health
Therapeutics
History
Economics
Arachis
Therapy
1960s
Factions

Keywords

  • radical psychiatry
  • United States
  • anti-psychiatry
  • deinstitutionalization

Cite this

@article{235bff745c234bd48184ce48c9a36b33,
title = "'Therapy means change, not peanut butter': radical psychiatry in the United States, 1967-1975",
abstract = "As early as the 1950s, the profession of psychiatry in the United States began to experience a series of subtle adjustments. By the mid-1960s, the American Psychiatric Association was gripped and bound by the larger social, economic and political trends of the era. Widespread political activist movements focused on the Vietnam War, civil rights for blacks, and the elevation of feminism. Amid this contentious, transitional climate, factions in the field of mental health deliberated over best practices as well as broader questions of modernisation, scientific legitimacy and human rights. The Radical Caucus of the American Psychiatric Association was one such faction. It included black and women's wings and challenged other members of the APA to embrace the transformative zeitgeist of the 1960s, as well as connect these tenets to the practice of psychiatry. This paper offers a snapshot of an important period in the history of American psychiatry, politics, and culture.",
keywords = "radical psychiatry, United States, anti-psychiatry, deinstitutionalization",
author = "Lucas Richert",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/shm/hkt072",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "104--121",
journal = "Social History of Medicine",
issn = "0951-631X",
number = "1",

}

'Therapy means change, not peanut butter' : radical psychiatry in the United States, 1967-1975. / Richert, Lucas.

In: Social History of Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.02.2014, p. 104-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Therapy means change, not peanut butter'

T2 - Social History of Medicine

AU - Richert, Lucas

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - As early as the 1950s, the profession of psychiatry in the United States began to experience a series of subtle adjustments. By the mid-1960s, the American Psychiatric Association was gripped and bound by the larger social, economic and political trends of the era. Widespread political activist movements focused on the Vietnam War, civil rights for blacks, and the elevation of feminism. Amid this contentious, transitional climate, factions in the field of mental health deliberated over best practices as well as broader questions of modernisation, scientific legitimacy and human rights. The Radical Caucus of the American Psychiatric Association was one such faction. It included black and women's wings and challenged other members of the APA to embrace the transformative zeitgeist of the 1960s, as well as connect these tenets to the practice of psychiatry. This paper offers a snapshot of an important period in the history of American psychiatry, politics, and culture.

AB - As early as the 1950s, the profession of psychiatry in the United States began to experience a series of subtle adjustments. By the mid-1960s, the American Psychiatric Association was gripped and bound by the larger social, economic and political trends of the era. Widespread political activist movements focused on the Vietnam War, civil rights for blacks, and the elevation of feminism. Amid this contentious, transitional climate, factions in the field of mental health deliberated over best practices as well as broader questions of modernisation, scientific legitimacy and human rights. The Radical Caucus of the American Psychiatric Association was one such faction. It included black and women's wings and challenged other members of the APA to embrace the transformative zeitgeist of the 1960s, as well as connect these tenets to the practice of psychiatry. This paper offers a snapshot of an important period in the history of American psychiatry, politics, and culture.

KW - radical psychiatry

KW - United States

KW - anti-psychiatry

KW - deinstitutionalization

UR - http://shm.oxfordjournals.org/

U2 - 10.1093/shm/hkt072

DO - 10.1093/shm/hkt072

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 104

EP - 121

JO - Social History of Medicine

JF - Social History of Medicine

SN - 0951-631X

IS - 1

ER -