Theory into practice: meditations on cultures of accountability and interdisciplinarity in marketing research

Douglas Brownlie, Paul Hewer, Pauline Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nowadays managerial culture is an increasingly critical ingredient of successful knowledge production. For some scholars and practitioners the apparent disconnect between funders, users and researchers as sites of production and consumption comes with costs to the marketing academy and its various stakeholder communities. Closing the perceived gap between theory and practice assumes the proportions of a heroic struggle between the sacred and the profane; between the abstract high-mindedness of theory and the lowly but useful deeds of practice. Various perspectives are offered by way of analysing the origins of this gap, as illustrated in the recent special issue of Marketing Intelligence and Planning (2004). The academy organises itself as if systems of accountability and accessibility in knowledge making are clearly understood and enforceable through the construct 'relevance'. We argue that the academy needs to better understand the inescapable part it plays in circulating unhelpful discourses of marketing theory and practice, and the imputed differences between them it authorises. We offer an alternative understanding that seeks to move the discipline beyond the isolationist stance unwittingly constructed by the problematic dualism of 'theory - practice', pointing to the need to better understand the making of marketing knowledge products, and the interdisciplinary social practices increasingly required of them.
LanguageEnglish
Pages395-409
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Marketing Management
Volume23
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Meditation
Practice theory
Interdisciplinarity
Marketing
Accountability
Marketing research
Marketing planning
Costs
Proportion
Product knowledge
Accessibility
Stakeholders
Marketing practices
Dualism
Knowledge production
Marketing intelligence
Marketing theory
Discourse
Social practice

Keywords

  • theory
  • practice
  • relevance
  • accountablity
  • interdisciplinarity
  • marketing

Cite this

@article{9fefa492d9b54773b742ae49567ebc2f,
title = "Theory into practice: meditations on cultures of accountability and interdisciplinarity in marketing research",
abstract = "Nowadays managerial culture is an increasingly critical ingredient of successful knowledge production. For some scholars and practitioners the apparent disconnect between funders, users and researchers as sites of production and consumption comes with costs to the marketing academy and its various stakeholder communities. Closing the perceived gap between theory and practice assumes the proportions of a heroic struggle between the sacred and the profane; between the abstract high-mindedness of theory and the lowly but useful deeds of practice. Various perspectives are offered by way of analysing the origins of this gap, as illustrated in the recent special issue of Marketing Intelligence and Planning (2004). The academy organises itself as if systems of accountability and accessibility in knowledge making are clearly understood and enforceable through the construct 'relevance'. We argue that the academy needs to better understand the inescapable part it plays in circulating unhelpful discourses of marketing theory and practice, and the imputed differences between them it authorises. We offer an alternative understanding that seeks to move the discipline beyond the isolationist stance unwittingly constructed by the problematic dualism of 'theory - practice', pointing to the need to better understand the making of marketing knowledge products, and the interdisciplinary social practices increasingly required of them.",
keywords = "theory, practice, relevance, accountablity, interdisciplinarity, marketing",
author = "Douglas Brownlie and Paul Hewer and Pauline Ferguson",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1362/026725707X212739",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "395--409",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Management",
issn = "0267-257X",
number = "5-6",

}

Theory into practice : meditations on cultures of accountability and interdisciplinarity in marketing research. / Brownlie, Douglas; Hewer, Paul; Ferguson, Pauline.

In: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 23, No. 5-6, 06.2007, p. 395-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory into practice

T2 - Journal of Marketing Management

AU - Brownlie, Douglas

AU - Hewer, Paul

AU - Ferguson, Pauline

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Nowadays managerial culture is an increasingly critical ingredient of successful knowledge production. For some scholars and practitioners the apparent disconnect between funders, users and researchers as sites of production and consumption comes with costs to the marketing academy and its various stakeholder communities. Closing the perceived gap between theory and practice assumes the proportions of a heroic struggle between the sacred and the profane; between the abstract high-mindedness of theory and the lowly but useful deeds of practice. Various perspectives are offered by way of analysing the origins of this gap, as illustrated in the recent special issue of Marketing Intelligence and Planning (2004). The academy organises itself as if systems of accountability and accessibility in knowledge making are clearly understood and enforceable through the construct 'relevance'. We argue that the academy needs to better understand the inescapable part it plays in circulating unhelpful discourses of marketing theory and practice, and the imputed differences between them it authorises. We offer an alternative understanding that seeks to move the discipline beyond the isolationist stance unwittingly constructed by the problematic dualism of 'theory - practice', pointing to the need to better understand the making of marketing knowledge products, and the interdisciplinary social practices increasingly required of them.

AB - Nowadays managerial culture is an increasingly critical ingredient of successful knowledge production. For some scholars and practitioners the apparent disconnect between funders, users and researchers as sites of production and consumption comes with costs to the marketing academy and its various stakeholder communities. Closing the perceived gap between theory and practice assumes the proportions of a heroic struggle between the sacred and the profane; between the abstract high-mindedness of theory and the lowly but useful deeds of practice. Various perspectives are offered by way of analysing the origins of this gap, as illustrated in the recent special issue of Marketing Intelligence and Planning (2004). The academy organises itself as if systems of accountability and accessibility in knowledge making are clearly understood and enforceable through the construct 'relevance'. We argue that the academy needs to better understand the inescapable part it plays in circulating unhelpful discourses of marketing theory and practice, and the imputed differences between them it authorises. We offer an alternative understanding that seeks to move the discipline beyond the isolationist stance unwittingly constructed by the problematic dualism of 'theory - practice', pointing to the need to better understand the making of marketing knowledge products, and the interdisciplinary social practices increasingly required of them.

KW - theory

KW - practice

KW - relevance

KW - accountablity

KW - interdisciplinarity

KW - marketing

U2 - 10.1362/026725707X212739

DO - 10.1362/026725707X212739

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 395

EP - 409

JO - Journal of Marketing Management

JF - Journal of Marketing Management

SN - 0267-257X

IS - 5-6

ER -