‘The very defective and erroneous method’: reading instruction and social identity in elite eighteenth-century learners

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Eighteenth-century readers received copious advice on how to improve their oral reading. Private lecturers and instructors, often called "elocutionists", disparaged old-fashioned methods of teaching. These older methods encouraged readers to use a sing-song tone and chanting rhythm when they read. These qualities were useful in earlier periods because they aided memorisation and helped readers to project into large social spaces. In the eighteenth century, however, the well-off had less need to memorise and were more likely to read aloud in domestic settings. The elocutionists therefore encouraged a "natural" or "conversational" style, and implied that by following their advice, readers would be able to acquire this. Yet at the same time, many eighteenth-century authorities suggested that good oral reading required the innate quality of taste. As a result, learners experienced a tension between the suggestion that anyone could learn to read in the new style through instruction, and the suggestion that only those genteel readers with taste could be good oral readers.
LanguageEnglish
Pages141-156
Number of pages16
JournalOxford Review of Education
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2010

Fingerprint

reading instruction
eighteenth century
elite
method of teaching
social space
song
instructor
university teacher
instruction

Keywords

  • reading
  • social identity
  • literature
  • social history

Cite this

@article{c5098b6653a74d6f8c42a8509deaaf0e,
title = "‘The very defective and erroneous method’: reading instruction and social identity in elite eighteenth-century learners",
abstract = "Eighteenth-century readers received copious advice on how to improve their oral reading. Private lecturers and instructors, often called {"}elocutionists{"}, disparaged old-fashioned methods of teaching. These older methods encouraged readers to use a sing-song tone and chanting rhythm when they read. These qualities were useful in earlier periods because they aided memorisation and helped readers to project into large social spaces. In the eighteenth century, however, the well-off had less need to memorise and were more likely to read aloud in domestic settings. The elocutionists therefore encouraged a {"}natural{"} or {"}conversational{"} style, and implied that by following their advice, readers would be able to acquire this. Yet at the same time, many eighteenth-century authorities suggested that good oral reading required the innate quality of taste. As a result, learners experienced a tension between the suggestion that anyone could learn to read in the new style through instruction, and the suggestion that only those genteel readers with taste could be good oral readers.",
keywords = "reading, social identity, literature, social history",
author = "Elspeth Jajdelska",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/03054981003696648",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "141--156",
journal = "Oxford Review of Education",
issn = "0305-4985",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘The very defective and erroneous method’

T2 - Oxford Review of Education

AU - Jajdelska, Elspeth

PY - 2010/4/20

Y1 - 2010/4/20

N2 - Eighteenth-century readers received copious advice on how to improve their oral reading. Private lecturers and instructors, often called "elocutionists", disparaged old-fashioned methods of teaching. These older methods encouraged readers to use a sing-song tone and chanting rhythm when they read. These qualities were useful in earlier periods because they aided memorisation and helped readers to project into large social spaces. In the eighteenth century, however, the well-off had less need to memorise and were more likely to read aloud in domestic settings. The elocutionists therefore encouraged a "natural" or "conversational" style, and implied that by following their advice, readers would be able to acquire this. Yet at the same time, many eighteenth-century authorities suggested that good oral reading required the innate quality of taste. As a result, learners experienced a tension between the suggestion that anyone could learn to read in the new style through instruction, and the suggestion that only those genteel readers with taste could be good oral readers.

AB - Eighteenth-century readers received copious advice on how to improve their oral reading. Private lecturers and instructors, often called "elocutionists", disparaged old-fashioned methods of teaching. These older methods encouraged readers to use a sing-song tone and chanting rhythm when they read. These qualities were useful in earlier periods because they aided memorisation and helped readers to project into large social spaces. In the eighteenth century, however, the well-off had less need to memorise and were more likely to read aloud in domestic settings. The elocutionists therefore encouraged a "natural" or "conversational" style, and implied that by following their advice, readers would be able to acquire this. Yet at the same time, many eighteenth-century authorities suggested that good oral reading required the innate quality of taste. As a result, learners experienced a tension between the suggestion that anyone could learn to read in the new style through instruction, and the suggestion that only those genteel readers with taste could be good oral readers.

KW - reading

KW - social identity

KW - literature

KW - social history

U2 - 10.1080/03054981003696648

DO - 10.1080/03054981003696648

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 141

EP - 156

JO - Oxford Review of Education

JF - Oxford Review of Education

SN - 0305-4985

IS - 2

ER -