The use of real-time digital video in the assessment of post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction

A. Gilmour, I. R. Mackay, D. Young, M. E. Hill, L. Brown, A. D. Malyon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Outcome measures of breast reconstruction have used panel assessment of photographs. This provides limited information to the assessor as these images are static.. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of digital video was a valid assessment tool and to compare its use against photography. 35 patients post-reconstruction underwent photography, digital video capture and completed Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS) questionnaires. The photographs/video clips were randomised and shown to a 21 member panel. Opinions on aesthetic aspects of the reconstruction were assessed using the BCTOS and Harris scale. Panel inter-rater agreement and patient-panel correlation was assessed using Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance and Spearman's rank correlation tests respectively. There was a "moderate" degree of inter-rater agreement amongst panel members in all categories. Greater agreement occurred using video footage to assess overall cosmesis (0.548 vs 0.507) and shape (0.505 vs 0.486). Video showed a greater degree of correlation with patient self-assessment scores in comparison to photography (0.311 vs 0.281). Video footage coupled with panel assessment is a valid method of assessing post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction and appears superior to still photographs in terms of inter-rater agreement and correlation with patient self-assessment.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1357-1363
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume67
Issue number10
Early online date1 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Mammaplasty
Photography
Breast Neoplasms
Nonparametric Statistics
Esthetics
Surgical Instruments
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Self-Assessment

Keywords

  • breast reconstruction
  • standardised photographs
  • digital video
  • subjective assessment

Cite this

Gilmour, A. ; Mackay, I. R. ; Young, D. ; Hill, M. E. ; Brown, L. ; Malyon, A. D. / The use of real-time digital video in the assessment of post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction. In: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 67, No. 10. pp. 1357-1363.
@article{4bc1cb55769944488a944082a291d00a,
title = "The use of real-time digital video in the assessment of post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction",
abstract = "Outcome measures of breast reconstruction have used panel assessment of photographs. This provides limited information to the assessor as these images are static.. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of digital video was a valid assessment tool and to compare its use against photography. 35 patients post-reconstruction underwent photography, digital video capture and completed Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS) questionnaires. The photographs/video clips were randomised and shown to a 21 member panel. Opinions on aesthetic aspects of the reconstruction were assessed using the BCTOS and Harris scale. Panel inter-rater agreement and patient-panel correlation was assessed using Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance and Spearman's rank correlation tests respectively. There was a {"}moderate{"} degree of inter-rater agreement amongst panel members in all categories. Greater agreement occurred using video footage to assess overall cosmesis (0.548 vs 0.507) and shape (0.505 vs 0.486). Video showed a greater degree of correlation with patient self-assessment scores in comparison to photography (0.311 vs 0.281). Video footage coupled with panel assessment is a valid method of assessing post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction and appears superior to still photographs in terms of inter-rater agreement and correlation with patient self-assessment.",
keywords = "breast reconstruction, standardised photographs, digital video, subjective assessment",
author = "A. Gilmour and Mackay, {I. R.} and D. Young and Hill, {M. E.} and L. Brown and Malyon, {A. D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.036",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "1357--1363",
journal = "Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery",
issn = "1748-6815",
number = "10",

}

The use of real-time digital video in the assessment of post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction. / Gilmour, A.; Mackay, I. R.; Young, D.; Hill, M. E.; Brown, L.; Malyon, A. D.

In: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 10, 01.10.2014, p. 1357-1363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of real-time digital video in the assessment of post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction

AU - Gilmour, A.

AU - Mackay, I. R.

AU - Young, D.

AU - Hill, M. E.

AU - Brown, L.

AU - Malyon, A. D.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Outcome measures of breast reconstruction have used panel assessment of photographs. This provides limited information to the assessor as these images are static.. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of digital video was a valid assessment tool and to compare its use against photography. 35 patients post-reconstruction underwent photography, digital video capture and completed Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS) questionnaires. The photographs/video clips were randomised and shown to a 21 member panel. Opinions on aesthetic aspects of the reconstruction were assessed using the BCTOS and Harris scale. Panel inter-rater agreement and patient-panel correlation was assessed using Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance and Spearman's rank correlation tests respectively. There was a "moderate" degree of inter-rater agreement amongst panel members in all categories. Greater agreement occurred using video footage to assess overall cosmesis (0.548 vs 0.507) and shape (0.505 vs 0.486). Video showed a greater degree of correlation with patient self-assessment scores in comparison to photography (0.311 vs 0.281). Video footage coupled with panel assessment is a valid method of assessing post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction and appears superior to still photographs in terms of inter-rater agreement and correlation with patient self-assessment.

AB - Outcome measures of breast reconstruction have used panel assessment of photographs. This provides limited information to the assessor as these images are static.. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of digital video was a valid assessment tool and to compare its use against photography. 35 patients post-reconstruction underwent photography, digital video capture and completed Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale (BCTOS) questionnaires. The photographs/video clips were randomised and shown to a 21 member panel. Opinions on aesthetic aspects of the reconstruction were assessed using the BCTOS and Harris scale. Panel inter-rater agreement and patient-panel correlation was assessed using Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance and Spearman's rank correlation tests respectively. There was a "moderate" degree of inter-rater agreement amongst panel members in all categories. Greater agreement occurred using video footage to assess overall cosmesis (0.548 vs 0.507) and shape (0.505 vs 0.486). Video showed a greater degree of correlation with patient self-assessment scores in comparison to photography (0.311 vs 0.281). Video footage coupled with panel assessment is a valid method of assessing post-operative outcomes of breast reconstruction and appears superior to still photographs in terms of inter-rater agreement and correlation with patient self-assessment.

KW - breast reconstruction

KW - standardised photographs

KW - digital video

KW - subjective assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908658278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681514002782

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.036

DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.036

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 1357

EP - 1363

JO - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

T2 - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

JF - Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

SN - 1748-6815

IS - 10

ER -