The use of expert opinion to assess the risk of emergence or re-emergence of infectious diseases in Canada associated with climate change

Ruth Cox, Crawford W. Revie, Javier Sanchez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global climate change is predicted to lead to an increase in infectious disease outbreaks. Reliable surveillance for diseases that are most likely to emerge is required, and given limited resources, policy decision makers need rational methods with which to prioritise pathogen threats. Here expert opinion was collected to determine what criteria could be used to prioritise diseases according to the likelihood of emergence in response to climate change and according to their impact. We identified a total of 40 criteria that might be used for this purpose in the Canadian context. The opinion of 64 experts from academic, government and independent backgrounds was collected to determine the importance of the criteria. A weight was calculated for each criterion based on the expert opinion. The five that were considered most influential on disease emergence or impact were: potential economic impact, severity of disease in the general human population, human case fatality rate, the type of climate that the pathogen can tolerate and the current climatic conditions in Canada. There was effective consensus about the influence of some criteria among participants, while for others there was considerable variation. The specific climate criteria that were most likely to influence disease emergence were: an annual increase in temperature, an increase in summer temperature, an increase in summer precipitation and to a lesser extent an increase in winter temperature. These climate variables were considered to be most influential on vector-borne diseases and on food and water-borne diseases. Opinion about the influence of climate on air-borne diseases and diseases spread by direct/indirect contact were more variable. The impact of emerging diseases on the human population was deemed more important than the impact on animal populations.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere41590
Number of pages13
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Climate Change
expert opinion
Expert Testimony
Climate change
infectious diseases
Canada
Communicable Diseases
climate change
climate
Climate
human population
waterborne diseases
indirect contact
vector-borne diseases
temperature
disease surveillance
emerging diseases
pathogens
summer
foodborne illness

Keywords

  • global climate change
  • infectious diseases
  • pathogen threats
  • population health
  • public health
  • modelling

Cite this

@article{99cb0c9e74794aec91f9606ac0c07995,
title = "The use of expert opinion to assess the risk of emergence or re-emergence of infectious diseases in Canada associated with climate change",
abstract = "Global climate change is predicted to lead to an increase in infectious disease outbreaks. Reliable surveillance for diseases that are most likely to emerge is required, and given limited resources, policy decision makers need rational methods with which to prioritise pathogen threats. Here expert opinion was collected to determine what criteria could be used to prioritise diseases according to the likelihood of emergence in response to climate change and according to their impact. We identified a total of 40 criteria that might be used for this purpose in the Canadian context. The opinion of 64 experts from academic, government and independent backgrounds was collected to determine the importance of the criteria. A weight was calculated for each criterion based on the expert opinion. The five that were considered most influential on disease emergence or impact were: potential economic impact, severity of disease in the general human population, human case fatality rate, the type of climate that the pathogen can tolerate and the current climatic conditions in Canada. There was effective consensus about the influence of some criteria among participants, while for others there was considerable variation. The specific climate criteria that were most likely to influence disease emergence were: an annual increase in temperature, an increase in summer temperature, an increase in summer precipitation and to a lesser extent an increase in winter temperature. These climate variables were considered to be most influential on vector-borne diseases and on food and water-borne diseases. Opinion about the influence of climate on air-borne diseases and diseases spread by direct/indirect contact were more variable. The impact of emerging diseases on the human population was deemed more important than the impact on animal populations.",
keywords = "global climate change, infectious diseases, pathogen threats, population health, public health, modelling",
author = "Ruth Cox and Revie, {Crawford W.} and Javier Sanchez",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0041590",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "PLOS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

The use of expert opinion to assess the risk of emergence or re-emergence of infectious diseases in Canada associated with climate change. / Cox, Ruth; Revie, Crawford W.; Sanchez, Javier.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 7, No. 7, e41590, 27.07.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of expert opinion to assess the risk of emergence or re-emergence of infectious diseases in Canada associated with climate change

AU - Cox, Ruth

AU - Revie, Crawford W.

AU - Sanchez, Javier

PY - 2012/7/27

Y1 - 2012/7/27

N2 - Global climate change is predicted to lead to an increase in infectious disease outbreaks. Reliable surveillance for diseases that are most likely to emerge is required, and given limited resources, policy decision makers need rational methods with which to prioritise pathogen threats. Here expert opinion was collected to determine what criteria could be used to prioritise diseases according to the likelihood of emergence in response to climate change and according to their impact. We identified a total of 40 criteria that might be used for this purpose in the Canadian context. The opinion of 64 experts from academic, government and independent backgrounds was collected to determine the importance of the criteria. A weight was calculated for each criterion based on the expert opinion. The five that were considered most influential on disease emergence or impact were: potential economic impact, severity of disease in the general human population, human case fatality rate, the type of climate that the pathogen can tolerate and the current climatic conditions in Canada. There was effective consensus about the influence of some criteria among participants, while for others there was considerable variation. The specific climate criteria that were most likely to influence disease emergence were: an annual increase in temperature, an increase in summer temperature, an increase in summer precipitation and to a lesser extent an increase in winter temperature. These climate variables were considered to be most influential on vector-borne diseases and on food and water-borne diseases. Opinion about the influence of climate on air-borne diseases and diseases spread by direct/indirect contact were more variable. The impact of emerging diseases on the human population was deemed more important than the impact on animal populations.

AB - Global climate change is predicted to lead to an increase in infectious disease outbreaks. Reliable surveillance for diseases that are most likely to emerge is required, and given limited resources, policy decision makers need rational methods with which to prioritise pathogen threats. Here expert opinion was collected to determine what criteria could be used to prioritise diseases according to the likelihood of emergence in response to climate change and according to their impact. We identified a total of 40 criteria that might be used for this purpose in the Canadian context. The opinion of 64 experts from academic, government and independent backgrounds was collected to determine the importance of the criteria. A weight was calculated for each criterion based on the expert opinion. The five that were considered most influential on disease emergence or impact were: potential economic impact, severity of disease in the general human population, human case fatality rate, the type of climate that the pathogen can tolerate and the current climatic conditions in Canada. There was effective consensus about the influence of some criteria among participants, while for others there was considerable variation. The specific climate criteria that were most likely to influence disease emergence were: an annual increase in temperature, an increase in summer temperature, an increase in summer precipitation and to a lesser extent an increase in winter temperature. These climate variables were considered to be most influential on vector-borne diseases and on food and water-borne diseases. Opinion about the influence of climate on air-borne diseases and diseases spread by direct/indirect contact were more variable. The impact of emerging diseases on the human population was deemed more important than the impact on animal populations.

KW - global climate change

KW - infectious diseases

KW - pathogen threats

KW - population health

KW - public health

KW - modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864398211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0041590

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0041590

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - PLOS One

T2 - PLOS One

JF - PLOS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e41590

ER -