The turbulence modelling of a pulsed impinging jet using LES and a divergence free mass flux corrected turbulent inlet

Matthew Haines, Ian Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines the best turbulence model to use when using computational fluid dynamics to simulate an impinging jet type flow. The IDDES, k-ω SST SAS, Smagorinsky and dynamic Smagorinsky models were used and compared to data collected from a laboratory impinging jet, developed to simulate thunderstorm downburst flow fields. From this it was found the dynamic Smagorinsky model performed best, especially at capturing the velocities and pressures in the near inlet region. A mesh dependency study was then performed for the dynamic Smagorinsky turbulence model. A small mesh dependency was demonstrated for the mesh densities studied but had issues in capturing the velocity height profile correctly in the near wall region. Despite this issue the model still closely matched the laboratory pressures around a 60 mm cube and demonstrated the suitability of this modelling approach for investigating thunderstorm downbursts.
LanguageEnglish
Pages338-364
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Volume188
Early online date18 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thunderstorms
Turbulence models
Dynamic models
Turbulence
Mass transfer
Flow fields
Computational fluid dynamics

Keywords

  • turbulence modelling
  • impinging jets
  • LES
  • downbursts
  • non-stationary analysis

Cite this

@article{daa4c77df2d4413298e194a11e2baee2,
title = "The turbulence modelling of a pulsed impinging jet using LES and a divergence free mass flux corrected turbulent inlet",
abstract = "This paper examines the best turbulence model to use when using computational fluid dynamics to simulate an impinging jet type flow. The IDDES, k-ω SST SAS, Smagorinsky and dynamic Smagorinsky models were used and compared to data collected from a laboratory impinging jet, developed to simulate thunderstorm downburst flow fields. From this it was found the dynamic Smagorinsky model performed best, especially at capturing the velocities and pressures in the near inlet region. A mesh dependency study was then performed for the dynamic Smagorinsky turbulence model. A small mesh dependency was demonstrated for the mesh densities studied but had issues in capturing the velocity height profile correctly in the near wall region. Despite this issue the model still closely matched the laboratory pressures around a 60 mm cube and demonstrated the suitability of this modelling approach for investigating thunderstorm downbursts.",
keywords = "turbulence modelling, impinging jets, LES, downbursts, non-stationary analysis",
author = "Matthew Haines and Ian Taylor",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.009",
language = "English",
volume = "188",
pages = "338--364",
journal = "Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics",
issn = "0167-6105",

}

The turbulence modelling of a pulsed impinging jet using LES and a divergence free mass flux corrected turbulent inlet. / Haines, Matthew ; Taylor, Ian.

In: Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 188, 31.05.2019, p. 338-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The turbulence modelling of a pulsed impinging jet using LES and a divergence free mass flux corrected turbulent inlet

AU - Haines, Matthew

AU - Taylor, Ian

PY - 2019/5/31

Y1 - 2019/5/31

N2 - This paper examines the best turbulence model to use when using computational fluid dynamics to simulate an impinging jet type flow. The IDDES, k-ω SST SAS, Smagorinsky and dynamic Smagorinsky models were used and compared to data collected from a laboratory impinging jet, developed to simulate thunderstorm downburst flow fields. From this it was found the dynamic Smagorinsky model performed best, especially at capturing the velocities and pressures in the near inlet region. A mesh dependency study was then performed for the dynamic Smagorinsky turbulence model. A small mesh dependency was demonstrated for the mesh densities studied but had issues in capturing the velocity height profile correctly in the near wall region. Despite this issue the model still closely matched the laboratory pressures around a 60 mm cube and demonstrated the suitability of this modelling approach for investigating thunderstorm downbursts.

AB - This paper examines the best turbulence model to use when using computational fluid dynamics to simulate an impinging jet type flow. The IDDES, k-ω SST SAS, Smagorinsky and dynamic Smagorinsky models were used and compared to data collected from a laboratory impinging jet, developed to simulate thunderstorm downburst flow fields. From this it was found the dynamic Smagorinsky model performed best, especially at capturing the velocities and pressures in the near inlet region. A mesh dependency study was then performed for the dynamic Smagorinsky turbulence model. A small mesh dependency was demonstrated for the mesh densities studied but had issues in capturing the velocity height profile correctly in the near wall region. Despite this issue the model still closely matched the laboratory pressures around a 60 mm cube and demonstrated the suitability of this modelling approach for investigating thunderstorm downbursts.

KW - turbulence modelling

KW - impinging jets

KW - LES

KW - downbursts

KW - non-stationary analysis

UR - https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-wind-engineering-and-industrial-aerodynamics

U2 - 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.03.009

M3 - Article

VL - 188

SP - 338

EP - 364

JO - Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

T2 - Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

JF - Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

SN - 0167-6105

ER -