Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 789-804 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Technology Analysis and Strategic Management |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 23 Sep 2010 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2010 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- selection
- technological trajectories
- innovation systems
- triple helix
- evolutionary theory
- knowledge base
- environments
- regimes
Cite this
}
The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. / Leydesdorff, Loet; Zawdie, Girma.
In: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 22, No. 7, 10.2010, p. 789-804.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - The triple helix perspective of innovation systems
AU - Leydesdorff, Loet
AU - Zawdie, Girma
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Alongside the neo-institutional model of networked relations among universities, industries, and governments, the triple helix can be provided with a neo-evolutionary interpretation as three selection environments operating upon one another: markets, organisations and technological opportunities. How are technological innovation systems different from national ones? The three selection environments fulfil social functions: wealth creation, organisation control and organised knowledge production. The main carriers of this system – industry, government and academia – provide the variation both recursively and by interacting among them under the pressure of competition. Empirical case studies enable us to understand how these evolutionary mechanisms can be expected to operate in historical instances. The model is needed for distinguishing, for example, between trajectories and regimes.
AB - Alongside the neo-institutional model of networked relations among universities, industries, and governments, the triple helix can be provided with a neo-evolutionary interpretation as three selection environments operating upon one another: markets, organisations and technological opportunities. How are technological innovation systems different from national ones? The three selection environments fulfil social functions: wealth creation, organisation control and organised knowledge production. The main carriers of this system – industry, government and academia – provide the variation both recursively and by interacting among them under the pressure of competition. Empirical case studies enable us to understand how these evolutionary mechanisms can be expected to operate in historical instances. The model is needed for distinguishing, for example, between trajectories and regimes.
KW - selection
KW - technological trajectories
KW - innovation systems
KW - triple helix
KW - evolutionary theory
KW - knowledge base
KW - environments
KW - regimes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957057465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.informaworld.com
U2 - 10.1080/09537325.2010.511142
DO - 10.1080/09537325.2010.511142
M3 - Article
VL - 22
SP - 789
EP - 804
JO - Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
JF - Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
SN - 0953-7325
IS - 7
ER -