The total toxic institution: when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Toxic leadership and toxic organisations appear to be common now, especially in the US where many of the statistics are available. Williams (2017 ) cites a number of studies and surveys that show a 50 per cent estimate in leaders and managers in the US who are ineffective, incompetent, or toxic, with increasing turnover and failure rates in chief executive officers as high as 75 per cent and up to 40 per cent of Fortune 500 executives engaging in misconduct. But the problem is also found in other countries— Veld sm a n’s (2012 ) research has found a 30 per cent toxic leadership rate internationally in a survey of the literature showing that the most common causes are hubris, ego, and a lack of emotional intelligence. A number of authors have identified the ways in which organisations are toxic and the role of leadership in producing toxicity: the use of punitive and bullying management practices, lack of compassion and empathy, ‘creeping’ bureaucracy, overemphasis on the ‘bottom line’, performance assessment oriented towards individual rather than team performance, and little evidence of concern for and contributions to the community (e.g. Lipman-Blumen 2005; Padilla, Hogan and Kaiser 2007 ).
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Perspectives on Maladministration in Education
Subtitle of host publicationTheories, Research and Critiques
EditorsEugenie A. Samier, Peter Milley
Place of Publication[S.I.]
StatePublished - 7 May 2018

Fingerprint

leadership
emotional intelligence
lack
performance assessment
turnover
empathy
bureaucracy
exclusion
statistics
manager
leader
cause
management
community
performance
evidence
literature

Keywords

  • education
  • psychological effects
  • educational institutions

Cite this

Samier, E. A. (2018). The total toxic institution: when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally. In E. A. Samier, & P. Milley (Eds.), International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education: Theories, Research and Critiques [S.I.].
Samier, Eugenie A./ The total toxic institution : when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally. International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education: Theories, Research and Critiques. editor / Eugenie A. Samier ; Peter Milley. [S.I.], 2018.
@inbook{01d79cfede0b446693c0579b123b7a59,
title = "The total toxic institution: when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally",
abstract = "Toxic leadership and toxic organisations appear to be common now, especially in the US where many of the statistics are available. Williams (2017 ) cites a number of studies and surveys that show a 50 per cent estimate in leaders and managers in the US who are ineffective, incompetent, or toxic, with increasing turnover and failure rates in chief executive officers as high as 75 per cent and up to 40 per cent of Fortune 500 executives engaging in misconduct. But the problem is also found in other countries— Veld sm a n’s (2012 ) research has found a 30 per cent toxic leadership rate internationally in a survey of the literature showing that the most common causes are hubris, ego, and a lack of emotional intelligence. A number of authors have identified the ways in which organisations are toxic and the role of leadership in producing toxicity: the use of punitive and bullying management practices, lack of compassion and empathy, ‘creeping’ bureaucracy, overemphasis on the ‘bottom line’, performance assessment oriented towards individual rather than team performance, and little evidence of concern for and contributions to the community (e.g. Lipman-Blumen 2005; Padilla, Hogan and Kaiser 2007 ).",
keywords = "education, psychological effects, educational institutions",
author = "Samier, {Eugenie A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "7",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138556638",
editor = "Samier, {Eugenie A.} and Peter Milley",
booktitle = "International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education",

}

Samier, EA 2018, The total toxic institution: when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally. in EA Samier & P Milley (eds), International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education: Theories, Research and Critiques. [S.I.].

The total toxic institution : when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally. / Samier, Eugenie A.

International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education: Theories, Research and Critiques. ed. / Eugenie A. Samier; Peter Milley. [S.I.], 2018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The total toxic institution

T2 - when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally

AU - Samier,Eugenie A.

PY - 2018/5/7

Y1 - 2018/5/7

N2 - Toxic leadership and toxic organisations appear to be common now, especially in the US where many of the statistics are available. Williams (2017 ) cites a number of studies and surveys that show a 50 per cent estimate in leaders and managers in the US who are ineffective, incompetent, or toxic, with increasing turnover and failure rates in chief executive officers as high as 75 per cent and up to 40 per cent of Fortune 500 executives engaging in misconduct. But the problem is also found in other countries— Veld sm a n’s (2012 ) research has found a 30 per cent toxic leadership rate internationally in a survey of the literature showing that the most common causes are hubris, ego, and a lack of emotional intelligence. A number of authors have identified the ways in which organisations are toxic and the role of leadership in producing toxicity: the use of punitive and bullying management practices, lack of compassion and empathy, ‘creeping’ bureaucracy, overemphasis on the ‘bottom line’, performance assessment oriented towards individual rather than team performance, and little evidence of concern for and contributions to the community (e.g. Lipman-Blumen 2005; Padilla, Hogan and Kaiser 2007 ).

AB - Toxic leadership and toxic organisations appear to be common now, especially in the US where many of the statistics are available. Williams (2017 ) cites a number of studies and surveys that show a 50 per cent estimate in leaders and managers in the US who are ineffective, incompetent, or toxic, with increasing turnover and failure rates in chief executive officers as high as 75 per cent and up to 40 per cent of Fortune 500 executives engaging in misconduct. But the problem is also found in other countries— Veld sm a n’s (2012 ) research has found a 30 per cent toxic leadership rate internationally in a survey of the literature showing that the most common causes are hubris, ego, and a lack of emotional intelligence. A number of authors have identified the ways in which organisations are toxic and the role of leadership in producing toxicity: the use of punitive and bullying management practices, lack of compassion and empathy, ‘creeping’ bureaucracy, overemphasis on the ‘bottom line’, performance assessment oriented towards individual rather than team performance, and little evidence of concern for and contributions to the community (e.g. Lipman-Blumen 2005; Padilla, Hogan and Kaiser 2007 ).

KW - education

KW - psychological effects

KW - educational institutions

UR - https://www.routledge.com/International-Perspectives-on-Maladministration-in-Education-Theories/Samier-Milley/p/book/9781138556645

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138556638

BT - International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education

CY - [S.I.]

ER -

Samier EA. The total toxic institution: when organisations fail psychologically, socially and morally. In Samier EA, Milley P, editors, International Perspectives on Maladministration in Education: Theories, Research and Critiques. [S.I.]. 2018.