The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights: the case of Namibia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The enclosure of commons is a historical event not limited to homelands of developed nations. Instead it also characterized their colonialization of other nations. Obtaining additional land was one of the motives of colonialism, but – for indigenous peoples – it meant more than the loss of tangible resources. This chapter, based on fieldwork with the Namibian San, indicates that the enclosure of land led to a loss of social relations that had sustained their culture and identity. Despite the fact that most San live in circumstances far different from their hunter-gatherer days, they are compelled to choose between identities defined by others, in which they are seen as either ‘backward’ or living ‘in harmony with nature’. In order to reclaim land rights from states, the San are obligated to portray themselves as an essentialized, cohesive indigenous group.
The critical analysis of Namibia's land reform undertaken in this chapter reveals a contradiction: on the one hand, one can observe growing international recognition of the land rights of indigenous peoples; on the other the enclosure of their land continues nationally. Namibia is one of the world's newest nations and, in its focus on creating a unified state, its multilayered German and South African colonial past looms large. For example, colonial tribal chieftaincy rule marginalized San hunter-gatherer bands. Today, the San are Namibia's poorest, most vulnerable group, living as scattered itinerant labourers, often on the outskirts of cities or settlements, and their communities are rife with social and health problems.
The fieldwork described in this chapter indicates that there is little reason for optimism about their sustainability, and a key reason is the long shadow cast by colonialism. It transformed land use from a practice that regulated social organization through property relations into one in which property boundaries affirm political-economic power structures.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationIndigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing
Subtitle of host publicationLessons Learned from San Hoodia Case
EditorsRachel Wynberg, Doris Schroeder, Roger Chennells
Place of PublicationDordrecht
PublisherSpringer
Pages141-163
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)9789048131228
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Namibia
colonial age
international recognition
outskirts
economic power
agrarian reform
optimism
political power
Homelands
Social Relations
land use
Group
sustainability
organization
event
health
resources
community

Keywords

  • ancestral land rights
  • indigenous peoples
  • indigenous rights
  • Namibia

Cite this

Vermeylen, S. (2009). The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights: the case of Namibia. In R. Wynberg, D. Schroeder, & R. Chennells (Eds.), Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case (pp. 141-163). Dordrecht : Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_8
Vermeylen, Saskia. / The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights : the case of Namibia. Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. editor / Rachel Wynberg ; Doris Schroeder ; Roger Chennells. Dordrecht : Springer, 2009. pp. 141-163
@inbook{08a293527c184116935ea66b9efb631e,
title = "The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights: the case of Namibia",
abstract = "The enclosure of commons is a historical event not limited to homelands of developed nations. Instead it also characterized their colonialization of other nations. Obtaining additional land was one of the motives of colonialism, but – for indigenous peoples – it meant more than the loss of tangible resources. This chapter, based on fieldwork with the Namibian San, indicates that the enclosure of land led to a loss of social relations that had sustained their culture and identity. Despite the fact that most San live in circumstances far different from their hunter-gatherer days, they are compelled to choose between identities defined by others, in which they are seen as either ‘backward’ or living ‘in harmony with nature’. In order to reclaim land rights from states, the San are obligated to portray themselves as an essentialized, cohesive indigenous group.The critical analysis of Namibia's land reform undertaken in this chapter reveals a contradiction: on the one hand, one can observe growing international recognition of the land rights of indigenous peoples; on the other the enclosure of their land continues nationally. Namibia is one of the world's newest nations and, in its focus on creating a unified state, its multilayered German and South African colonial past looms large. For example, colonial tribal chieftaincy rule marginalized San hunter-gatherer bands. Today, the San are Namibia's poorest, most vulnerable group, living as scattered itinerant labourers, often on the outskirts of cities or settlements, and their communities are rife with social and health problems.The fieldwork described in this chapter indicates that there is little reason for optimism about their sustainability, and a key reason is the long shadow cast by colonialism. It transformed land use from a practice that regulated social organization through property relations into one in which property boundaries affirm political-economic power structures.",
keywords = "ancestral land rights, indigenous peoples, indigenous rights, Namibia",
author = "Saskia Vermeylen",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789048131228",
pages = "141--163",
editor = "Rachel Wynberg and Doris Schroeder and Roger Chennells",
booktitle = "Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Vermeylen, S 2009, The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights: the case of Namibia. in R Wynberg, D Schroeder & R Chennells (eds), Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. Springer, Dordrecht , pp. 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_8

The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights : the case of Namibia. / Vermeylen, Saskia.

Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. ed. / Rachel Wynberg; Doris Schroeder; Roger Chennells. Dordrecht : Springer, 2009. p. 141-163.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights

T2 - the case of Namibia

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - The enclosure of commons is a historical event not limited to homelands of developed nations. Instead it also characterized their colonialization of other nations. Obtaining additional land was one of the motives of colonialism, but – for indigenous peoples – it meant more than the loss of tangible resources. This chapter, based on fieldwork with the Namibian San, indicates that the enclosure of land led to a loss of social relations that had sustained their culture and identity. Despite the fact that most San live in circumstances far different from their hunter-gatherer days, they are compelled to choose between identities defined by others, in which they are seen as either ‘backward’ or living ‘in harmony with nature’. In order to reclaim land rights from states, the San are obligated to portray themselves as an essentialized, cohesive indigenous group.The critical analysis of Namibia's land reform undertaken in this chapter reveals a contradiction: on the one hand, one can observe growing international recognition of the land rights of indigenous peoples; on the other the enclosure of their land continues nationally. Namibia is one of the world's newest nations and, in its focus on creating a unified state, its multilayered German and South African colonial past looms large. For example, colonial tribal chieftaincy rule marginalized San hunter-gatherer bands. Today, the San are Namibia's poorest, most vulnerable group, living as scattered itinerant labourers, often on the outskirts of cities or settlements, and their communities are rife with social and health problems.The fieldwork described in this chapter indicates that there is little reason for optimism about their sustainability, and a key reason is the long shadow cast by colonialism. It transformed land use from a practice that regulated social organization through property relations into one in which property boundaries affirm political-economic power structures.

AB - The enclosure of commons is a historical event not limited to homelands of developed nations. Instead it also characterized their colonialization of other nations. Obtaining additional land was one of the motives of colonialism, but – for indigenous peoples – it meant more than the loss of tangible resources. This chapter, based on fieldwork with the Namibian San, indicates that the enclosure of land led to a loss of social relations that had sustained their culture and identity. Despite the fact that most San live in circumstances far different from their hunter-gatherer days, they are compelled to choose between identities defined by others, in which they are seen as either ‘backward’ or living ‘in harmony with nature’. In order to reclaim land rights from states, the San are obligated to portray themselves as an essentialized, cohesive indigenous group.The critical analysis of Namibia's land reform undertaken in this chapter reveals a contradiction: on the one hand, one can observe growing international recognition of the land rights of indigenous peoples; on the other the enclosure of their land continues nationally. Namibia is one of the world's newest nations and, in its focus on creating a unified state, its multilayered German and South African colonial past looms large. For example, colonial tribal chieftaincy rule marginalized San hunter-gatherer bands. Today, the San are Namibia's poorest, most vulnerable group, living as scattered itinerant labourers, often on the outskirts of cities or settlements, and their communities are rife with social and health problems.The fieldwork described in this chapter indicates that there is little reason for optimism about their sustainability, and a key reason is the long shadow cast by colonialism. It transformed land use from a practice that regulated social organization through property relations into one in which property boundaries affirm political-economic power structures.

KW - ancestral land rights

KW - indigenous peoples

KW - indigenous rights

KW - Namibia

UR - http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5

U2 - 10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_8

DO - 10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789048131228

SP - 141

EP - 163

BT - Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing

A2 - Wynberg, Rachel

A2 - Schroeder, Doris

A2 - Chennells, Roger

PB - Springer

CY - Dordrecht

ER -

Vermeylen S. The struggle for indigenous peoples' land rights: the case of Namibia. In Wynberg R, Schroeder D, Chennells R, editors, Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons Learned from San Hoodia Case. Dordrecht : Springer. 2009. p. 141-163 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_8