The structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale

R.C. O'Connor, D. Dixon, Susan Rasmussen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, the authors examined the factor structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale (CAPS; G. L. Flett, P. L. Hewitt, D. J. Boucher, L. A. Davidson, & Y. Munro, 1997) in 2 samples of adolescents (15-16 years old). In Sample 1 (n = 624), confirmatory factor analysis did not support a 2-factor structure (self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism). As in B. T. McCreary, T. E. Joiner, N. B. Schmidt, & N. S. Ialongo (2004), reanalysis suggested a 3-factor solution (i.e., socially prescribed perfectionism, self-oriented-Striving perfectionism, self-oriented-Critical perfectionism). The authors validated their 3-factor model in an independent replication sample (Sample 2; n = 514) and confirmed that the 3-factor structure was invariant across gender and time (test-retest over 6 months). Taking these analyses together, the authors concluded that their discriminant 3-factor structure is robust. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed. More research on the predictive validity of the CAPS is suggested.
LanguageEnglish
Pages437-443
Number of pages7
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Perfectionism
Research

Keywords

  • perfectionism
  • adolescent
  • child
  • factor structure
  • reliability

Cite this

@article{f5a0d46f29874dd6bcc3f930c6d0af48,
title = "The structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale",
abstract = "In this study, the authors examined the factor structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale (CAPS; G. L. Flett, P. L. Hewitt, D. J. Boucher, L. A. Davidson, & Y. Munro, 1997) in 2 samples of adolescents (15-16 years old). In Sample 1 (n = 624), confirmatory factor analysis did not support a 2-factor structure (self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism). As in B. T. McCreary, T. E. Joiner, N. B. Schmidt, & N. S. Ialongo (2004), reanalysis suggested a 3-factor solution (i.e., socially prescribed perfectionism, self-oriented-Striving perfectionism, self-oriented-Critical perfectionism). The authors validated their 3-factor model in an independent replication sample (Sample 2; n = 514) and confirmed that the 3-factor structure was invariant across gender and time (test-retest over 6 months). Taking these analyses together, the authors concluded that their discriminant 3-factor structure is robust. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed. More research on the predictive validity of the CAPS is suggested.",
keywords = "perfectionism, adolescent, child, factor structure, reliability",
author = "R.C. O'Connor and D. Dixon and Susan Rasmussen",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/a0016264",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "437--443",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
number = "3",

}

The structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale. / O'Connor, R.C.; Dixon, D.; Rasmussen, Susan.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 21, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 437-443.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale

AU - O'Connor, R.C.

AU - Dixon, D.

AU - Rasmussen, Susan

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - In this study, the authors examined the factor structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale (CAPS; G. L. Flett, P. L. Hewitt, D. J. Boucher, L. A. Davidson, & Y. Munro, 1997) in 2 samples of adolescents (15-16 years old). In Sample 1 (n = 624), confirmatory factor analysis did not support a 2-factor structure (self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism). As in B. T. McCreary, T. E. Joiner, N. B. Schmidt, & N. S. Ialongo (2004), reanalysis suggested a 3-factor solution (i.e., socially prescribed perfectionism, self-oriented-Striving perfectionism, self-oriented-Critical perfectionism). The authors validated their 3-factor model in an independent replication sample (Sample 2; n = 514) and confirmed that the 3-factor structure was invariant across gender and time (test-retest over 6 months). Taking these analyses together, the authors concluded that their discriminant 3-factor structure is robust. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed. More research on the predictive validity of the CAPS is suggested.

AB - In this study, the authors examined the factor structure and temporal stability of the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale (CAPS; G. L. Flett, P. L. Hewitt, D. J. Boucher, L. A. Davidson, & Y. Munro, 1997) in 2 samples of adolescents (15-16 years old). In Sample 1 (n = 624), confirmatory factor analysis did not support a 2-factor structure (self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism). As in B. T. McCreary, T. E. Joiner, N. B. Schmidt, & N. S. Ialongo (2004), reanalysis suggested a 3-factor solution (i.e., socially prescribed perfectionism, self-oriented-Striving perfectionism, self-oriented-Critical perfectionism). The authors validated their 3-factor model in an independent replication sample (Sample 2; n = 514) and confirmed that the 3-factor structure was invariant across gender and time (test-retest over 6 months). Taking these analyses together, the authors concluded that their discriminant 3-factor structure is robust. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed. More research on the predictive validity of the CAPS is suggested.

KW - perfectionism

KW - adolescent

KW - child

KW - factor structure

KW - reliability

U2 - 10.1037/a0016264

DO - 10.1037/a0016264

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 437

EP - 443

JO - Psychological Assessment

T2 - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 3

ER -