The staging of Brexit: What lies behind the lack of orientation in the negotiations to the UK exit from the EU?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two years after the UK's vote to leave the EU the notion of what "Brexit" means remains unclear. Some have even spoken of a "blah, blah, Brexit" (Thornberry) by which a vacuous debate is engaged in, in order to secure a formal EU-exit so that, subsequently, a new direction to the process can be decided on (Gove). The extent to which the negotiations are simply meant to run on without resolution to either make a "hard Brexit" inevitable or to ensure a negotiated paralysis is the subject of this paper. The dangers of this "blah, blah, Brexit", the coherence and credibility of the Westminster position(s) in the wake of the Supreme Court's judgment in Miller, especially for Northern Ireland and Scotland, are illuminated.
Translated title of the contributionThe staging of Brexit: What lies behind the lack of orientation in the negotiations to the UK exit from the EU?
LanguageGerman
Pages561-576
Number of pages15
JournalEuroparecht
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

staging
EU
judgment or sentence
lack
credibility
Supreme Court
voter
coherence

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • hard Brexit

Cite this

@article{f08f7080314a454ba9d141270313ef52,
title = "Der inszenierte Brexit: Was steckt hinter den ziellos scheinenden Verhandlungen zum EU-Austritt des Vereinigten Koenigsreichs?",
abstract = "Two years after the UK's vote to leave the EU the notion of what {"}Brexit{"} means remains unclear. Some have even spoken of a {"}blah, blah, Brexit{"} (Thornberry) by which a vacuous debate is engaged in, in order to secure a formal EU-exit so that, subsequently, a new direction to the process can be decided on (Gove). The extent to which the negotiations are simply meant to run on without resolution to either make a {"}hard Brexit{"} inevitable or to ensure a negotiated paralysis is the subject of this paper. The dangers of this {"}blah, blah, Brexit{"}, the coherence and credibility of the Westminster position(s) in the wake of the Supreme Court's judgment in Miller, especially for Northern Ireland and Scotland, are illuminated.",
keywords = "Brexit, hard Brexit",
author = "Mel Kenny",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "7",
doi = "10.5771/0531-2485-2018-5-561",
language = "German",
volume = "53",
pages = "561--576",
journal = "Europarecht",
issn = "0531-2485",
number = "5",

}

Der inszenierte Brexit : Was steckt hinter den ziellos scheinenden Verhandlungen zum EU-Austritt des Vereinigten Koenigsreichs? / Kenny, Mel.

In: Europarecht, Vol. 53, No. 5, 07.11.2018, p. 561-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Der inszenierte Brexit

T2 - Europarecht

AU - Kenny, Mel

PY - 2018/11/7

Y1 - 2018/11/7

N2 - Two years after the UK's vote to leave the EU the notion of what "Brexit" means remains unclear. Some have even spoken of a "blah, blah, Brexit" (Thornberry) by which a vacuous debate is engaged in, in order to secure a formal EU-exit so that, subsequently, a new direction to the process can be decided on (Gove). The extent to which the negotiations are simply meant to run on without resolution to either make a "hard Brexit" inevitable or to ensure a negotiated paralysis is the subject of this paper. The dangers of this "blah, blah, Brexit", the coherence and credibility of the Westminster position(s) in the wake of the Supreme Court's judgment in Miller, especially for Northern Ireland and Scotland, are illuminated.

AB - Two years after the UK's vote to leave the EU the notion of what "Brexit" means remains unclear. Some have even spoken of a "blah, blah, Brexit" (Thornberry) by which a vacuous debate is engaged in, in order to secure a formal EU-exit so that, subsequently, a new direction to the process can be decided on (Gove). The extent to which the negotiations are simply meant to run on without resolution to either make a "hard Brexit" inevitable or to ensure a negotiated paralysis is the subject of this paper. The dangers of this "blah, blah, Brexit", the coherence and credibility of the Westminster position(s) in the wake of the Supreme Court's judgment in Miller, especially for Northern Ireland and Scotland, are illuminated.

KW - Brexit

KW - hard Brexit

U2 - 10.5771/0531-2485-2018-5-561

DO - 10.5771/0531-2485-2018-5-561

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 561

EP - 576

JO - Europarecht

JF - Europarecht

SN - 0531-2485

IS - 5

ER -