The sound of one hand clapping

the Gill Review's faint praise for mediation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

364 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article considers the 2009 Scottish Civil Courts Review, popularly known as the 'Gill' Review after its Chairman, Lord Gill (Scotland's second most senior judge). It speculates about the reasons for the lack of concrete encouragement for mediation in the Report's recommendations, rendered particularly striking by the contrast with robust judicial encouragement in England & Wales and throughout the Common Law world. It sets out a taxonomy of ways in which jurisdictions can help litigants to consider mediation and finds that the Report has rejected even the gentlest of these. In spite of this, the article suggests that the Scottish Government could still underpin dispute resolution beyond the confines of the courts by clarifying the position regarding confidentiality and admissibility and by rendering mediated outcomes more readily enforceable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-92
Number of pages7
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume14
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

mediation
civil court
common law
taxonomy
jurisdiction
lack
Mediation
Sound
Confidentiality
Jurisdiction
Taxonomy
Dispute Resolution
Rendering
Common Law
Wales
England
Scotland
Government

Keywords

  • court reform
  • Gill Review
  • scottish civil courts review
  • civil justice
  • ADR
  • mediation

Cite this

@article{786773be472b458aa94df905dae02d73,
title = "The sound of one hand clapping: the Gill Review's faint praise for mediation",
abstract = "This article considers the 2009 Scottish Civil Courts Review, popularly known as the 'Gill' Review after its Chairman, Lord Gill (Scotland's second most senior judge). It speculates about the reasons for the lack of concrete encouragement for mediation in the Report's recommendations, rendered particularly striking by the contrast with robust judicial encouragement in England & Wales and throughout the Common Law world. It sets out a taxonomy of ways in which jurisdictions can help litigants to consider mediation and finds that the Report has rejected even the gentlest of these. In spite of this, the article suggests that the Scottish Government could still underpin dispute resolution beyond the confines of the courts by clarifying the position regarding confidentiality and admissibility and by rendering mediated outcomes more readily enforceable.",
keywords = "court reform, Gill Review, scottish civil courts review, civil justice, ADR, mediation",
author = "Charlie Irvine",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "85--92",
journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",
issn = "1364-9809",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
number = "1",

}

The sound of one hand clapping : the Gill Review's faint praise for mediation. / Irvine, Charlie.

In: Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 02.01.2010, p. 85-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sound of one hand clapping

T2 - the Gill Review's faint praise for mediation

AU - Irvine, Charlie

PY - 2010/1/2

Y1 - 2010/1/2

N2 - This article considers the 2009 Scottish Civil Courts Review, popularly known as the 'Gill' Review after its Chairman, Lord Gill (Scotland's second most senior judge). It speculates about the reasons for the lack of concrete encouragement for mediation in the Report's recommendations, rendered particularly striking by the contrast with robust judicial encouragement in England & Wales and throughout the Common Law world. It sets out a taxonomy of ways in which jurisdictions can help litigants to consider mediation and finds that the Report has rejected even the gentlest of these. In spite of this, the article suggests that the Scottish Government could still underpin dispute resolution beyond the confines of the courts by clarifying the position regarding confidentiality and admissibility and by rendering mediated outcomes more readily enforceable.

AB - This article considers the 2009 Scottish Civil Courts Review, popularly known as the 'Gill' Review after its Chairman, Lord Gill (Scotland's second most senior judge). It speculates about the reasons for the lack of concrete encouragement for mediation in the Report's recommendations, rendered particularly striking by the contrast with robust judicial encouragement in England & Wales and throughout the Common Law world. It sets out a taxonomy of ways in which jurisdictions can help litigants to consider mediation and finds that the Report has rejected even the gentlest of these. In spite of this, the article suggests that the Scottish Government could still underpin dispute resolution beyond the confines of the courts by clarifying the position regarding confidentiality and admissibility and by rendering mediated outcomes more readily enforceable.

KW - court reform

KW - Gill Review

KW - scottish civil courts review

KW - civil justice

KW - ADR

KW - mediation

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 85

EP - 92

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

SN - 1364-9809

IS - 1

ER -