The Scottish Parliament and the Barnett Formula

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we shall look at the implications of the conventions and devices to be adopted for funding the Scottish parliament. It will be argued that there are major problems with the basic mechanism to be adopted (the Barnett formula) and that the discretionary tax raising powers for the Parliament may actually create more problems than it solves. Further, the Barnett formula is designed to lead to the eventual convergence of public spending levels per head in Scotland with those prevailing in England. Consequently, questions of whether or not Scotland is over-subsidised relative to England really miss the point since the practical issue is not a question of whether there should a reallocation of public spending from Scotland to England, but rather when and how quickly this will occur. Some economic and political implications of these arguments are considered and we finish with some proposals for dealing with the dangers to the Scottish Parliament posed by the Barnett formula.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-48
Number of pages17
JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
Volume24
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1998

Fingerprint

England
Parliament
Scotland
Public spending
Economics
Funding
Tax
Reallocation

Keywords

  • Scottish Parliament
  • Scotland
  • Barnett Formula
  • public funding
  • public expenditure

Cite this

@article{ba5d17c6530f45a09da870cb4d3cce37,
title = "The Scottish Parliament and the Barnett Formula",
abstract = "In this paper we shall look at the implications of the conventions and devices to be adopted for funding the Scottish parliament. It will be argued that there are major problems with the basic mechanism to be adopted (the Barnett formula) and that the discretionary tax raising powers for the Parliament may actually create more problems than it solves. Further, the Barnett formula is designed to lead to the eventual convergence of public spending levels per head in Scotland with those prevailing in England. Consequently, questions of whether or not Scotland is over-subsidised relative to England really miss the point since the practical issue is not a question of whether there should a reallocation of public spending from Scotland to England, but rather when and how quickly this will occur. Some economic and political implications of these arguments are considered and we finish with some proposals for dealing with the dangers to the Scottish Parliament posed by the Barnett formula.",
keywords = "Scottish Parliament, Scotland, Barnett Formula, public funding, public expenditure",
author = "Neil Kay",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "32--48",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "1",

}

The Scottish Parliament and the Barnett Formula. / Kay, Neil.

In: Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol. 24, No. 1, 12.1998, p. 32-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Scottish Parliament and the Barnett Formula

AU - Kay, Neil

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - In this paper we shall look at the implications of the conventions and devices to be adopted for funding the Scottish parliament. It will be argued that there are major problems with the basic mechanism to be adopted (the Barnett formula) and that the discretionary tax raising powers for the Parliament may actually create more problems than it solves. Further, the Barnett formula is designed to lead to the eventual convergence of public spending levels per head in Scotland with those prevailing in England. Consequently, questions of whether or not Scotland is over-subsidised relative to England really miss the point since the practical issue is not a question of whether there should a reallocation of public spending from Scotland to England, but rather when and how quickly this will occur. Some economic and political implications of these arguments are considered and we finish with some proposals for dealing with the dangers to the Scottish Parliament posed by the Barnett formula.

AB - In this paper we shall look at the implications of the conventions and devices to be adopted for funding the Scottish parliament. It will be argued that there are major problems with the basic mechanism to be adopted (the Barnett formula) and that the discretionary tax raising powers for the Parliament may actually create more problems than it solves. Further, the Barnett formula is designed to lead to the eventual convergence of public spending levels per head in Scotland with those prevailing in England. Consequently, questions of whether or not Scotland is over-subsidised relative to England really miss the point since the practical issue is not a question of whether there should a reallocation of public spending from Scotland to England, but rather when and how quickly this will occur. Some economic and political implications of these arguments are considered and we finish with some proposals for dealing with the dangers to the Scottish Parliament posed by the Barnett formula.

KW - Scottish Parliament

KW - Scotland

KW - Barnett Formula

KW - public funding

KW - public expenditure

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 32

EP - 48

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 1

ER -