The role of group working in assembly organization

Robert van der Meer, Mairi Gudim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Demonstrates how different forms of assembly organization can be classified on the basis of three structural characteristics and analyses the possible relationships between these characteristics and the various dimensions of competitive advantage. Uses the resulting model of the “assembly organization cube” to show that ‐ apart from four “pure” forms of assembly organization ‐ there is a multitude of potential “hybrid” forms, all of which may be expected to support the competitive advantage of the business in different ways from one another. Applies the model to a case study of group working in a clothing manufacturing plant. Explains how the net effects of the move from progressive assembly in batches towards a form of assembly organization incorporating somewhat longer task cycles, tighter coupling, and a more horizontal form of co‐operation have been significant improvements in each of the dimensions of competitive advantage targeted (throughput times, product flexibility, in‐process quality, and production efficiency) as well as an increase in the level of job satisfaction of assembly operators.
LanguageEnglish
Pages119-140
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Operations and Production Management
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Job satisfaction
Throughput
Competitive advantage
Industry
Operator
Batch
Process quality
Production efficiency
Manufacturing

Keywords

  • group working
  • competitive advantage
  • assembly

Cite this

@article{c7265d011ab44ba3810ebc9cf310569a,
title = "The role of group working in assembly organization",
abstract = "Demonstrates how different forms of assembly organization can be classified on the basis of three structural characteristics and analyses the possible relationships between these characteristics and the various dimensions of competitive advantage. Uses the resulting model of the “assembly organization cube” to show that ‐ apart from four “pure” forms of assembly organization ‐ there is a multitude of potential “hybrid” forms, all of which may be expected to support the competitive advantage of the business in different ways from one another. Applies the model to a case study of group working in a clothing manufacturing plant. Explains how the net effects of the move from progressive assembly in batches towards a form of assembly organization incorporating somewhat longer task cycles, tighter coupling, and a more horizontal form of co‐operation have been significant improvements in each of the dimensions of competitive advantage targeted (throughput times, product flexibility, in‐process quality, and production efficiency) as well as an increase in the level of job satisfaction of assembly operators.",
keywords = "group working, competitive advantage, assembly",
author = "{van der Meer}, Robert and Mairi Gudim",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1108/01443579610109884",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "119--140",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

The role of group working in assembly organization. / van der Meer, Robert; Gudim, Mairi.

In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1996, p. 119-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of group working in assembly organization

AU - van der Meer, Robert

AU - Gudim, Mairi

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Demonstrates how different forms of assembly organization can be classified on the basis of three structural characteristics and analyses the possible relationships between these characteristics and the various dimensions of competitive advantage. Uses the resulting model of the “assembly organization cube” to show that ‐ apart from four “pure” forms of assembly organization ‐ there is a multitude of potential “hybrid” forms, all of which may be expected to support the competitive advantage of the business in different ways from one another. Applies the model to a case study of group working in a clothing manufacturing plant. Explains how the net effects of the move from progressive assembly in batches towards a form of assembly organization incorporating somewhat longer task cycles, tighter coupling, and a more horizontal form of co‐operation have been significant improvements in each of the dimensions of competitive advantage targeted (throughput times, product flexibility, in‐process quality, and production efficiency) as well as an increase in the level of job satisfaction of assembly operators.

AB - Demonstrates how different forms of assembly organization can be classified on the basis of three structural characteristics and analyses the possible relationships between these characteristics and the various dimensions of competitive advantage. Uses the resulting model of the “assembly organization cube” to show that ‐ apart from four “pure” forms of assembly organization ‐ there is a multitude of potential “hybrid” forms, all of which may be expected to support the competitive advantage of the business in different ways from one another. Applies the model to a case study of group working in a clothing manufacturing plant. Explains how the net effects of the move from progressive assembly in batches towards a form of assembly organization incorporating somewhat longer task cycles, tighter coupling, and a more horizontal form of co‐operation have been significant improvements in each of the dimensions of competitive advantage targeted (throughput times, product flexibility, in‐process quality, and production efficiency) as well as an increase in the level of job satisfaction of assembly operators.

KW - group working

KW - competitive advantage

KW - assembly

U2 - 10.1108/01443579610109884

DO - 10.1108/01443579610109884

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 119

EP - 140

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

T2 - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 2

ER -