The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education: the end of an era?

Nigel Craig, Stuart Tennant, Michael Murray, Alan Forster, Nick Pilcher

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Delivering excellence in higher engineering education is dependent on many variables. This includes programme design, delivery and content, university support and the knowledge, experience and enthusiasm of faculty members. Over the past decade there has been a notable shift in engineering faculty recruitment policy. No longer is the professional and industrial experience of the engineering practitioner revered as a co-opted member of the engineering department. Despite their potential contribution as grounded, practical and relevant engineering lecturers, their impoverished knowledge of research funding mechanisms and lack of research capital is an acute disadvantage. This is a discussion paper exploring the marginalization of experienced practitioners in engineering education and the changing role of the educator as a career academic. The career academic is highly qualified and typically well versed in research activity; however, unlike their industrial counterparts they are devoid of any meaningful practical engineering experience. This changing role of the educator in engineering education has far-reaching consequences for teaching and learning and future industry skills. Given the longstanding connection between theory and practice in engineering education, this departure in pedagogical policy arguably signals the end of an era. The systematic fragmentation of engineering theory from industrial practice within higher education institutes arguably needs to be challenged. Recent government rhetoric to focus on the pedagogical aspects through a Teaching Excellence Framework is arguably aiming at the wrong target. Instead, reconstructing engineering programmes fit for the twenty-first century will require alternative teaching strategies, revitalised industrial advisory boards and uncommon leadership within engineering faculties.

Conference

Conference6th International Symposium for Engineering Education
CountryUnited Kingdom
CitySheffield
Period14/07/1615/07/16

Fingerprint

Engineering education
engineering
education
Teaching
academic career
educator
experience
further education
Education
teaching strategy
twenty-first century
fragmentation
rhetoric
university teacher
funding
leadership

Keywords

  • engineering education
  • higher education
  • industrial practice

Cite this

Craig, N., Tennant, S., Murray, M., Forster, A., & Pilcher, N. (2016). The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education: the end of an era?. 271-278. Paper presented at 6th International Symposium for Engineering Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Craig, Nigel ; Tennant, Stuart ; Murray, Michael ; Forster, Alan ; Pilcher, Nick. / The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education : the end of an era?. Paper presented at 6th International Symposium for Engineering Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom.8 p.
@conference{f8527f93882e44bc920562e2455bbfee,
title = "The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education: the end of an era?",
abstract = "Delivering excellence in higher engineering education is dependent on many variables. This includes programme design, delivery and content, university support and the knowledge, experience and enthusiasm of faculty members. Over the past decade there has been a notable shift in engineering faculty recruitment policy. No longer is the professional and industrial experience of the engineering practitioner revered as a co-opted member of the engineering department. Despite their potential contribution as grounded, practical and relevant engineering lecturers, their impoverished knowledge of research funding mechanisms and lack of research capital is an acute disadvantage. This is a discussion paper exploring the marginalization of experienced practitioners in engineering education and the changing role of the educator as a career academic. The career academic is highly qualified and typically well versed in research activity; however, unlike their industrial counterparts they are devoid of any meaningful practical engineering experience. This changing role of the educator in engineering education has far-reaching consequences for teaching and learning and future industry skills. Given the longstanding connection between theory and practice in engineering education, this departure in pedagogical policy arguably signals the end of an era. The systematic fragmentation of engineering theory from industrial practice within higher education institutes arguably needs to be challenged. Recent government rhetoric to focus on the pedagogical aspects through a Teaching Excellence Framework is arguably aiming at the wrong target. Instead, reconstructing engineering programmes fit for the twenty-first century will require alternative teaching strategies, revitalised industrial advisory boards and uncommon leadership within engineering faculties.",
keywords = "engineering education, higher education, industrial practice",
author = "Nigel Craig and Stuart Tennant and Michael Murray and Alan Forster and Nick Pilcher",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "14",
language = "English",
pages = "271--278",
note = "6th International Symposium for Engineering Education ; Conference date: 14-07-2016 Through 15-07-2016",

}

Craig, N, Tennant, S, Murray, M, Forster, A & Pilcher, N 2016, 'The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education: the end of an era?' Paper presented at 6th International Symposium for Engineering Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom, 14/07/16 - 15/07/16, pp. 271-278.

The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education : the end of an era? / Craig, Nigel; Tennant, Stuart; Murray, Michael; Forster, Alan; Pilcher, Nick.

2016. 271-278 Paper presented at 6th International Symposium for Engineering Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education

T2 - the end of an era?

AU - Craig, Nigel

AU - Tennant, Stuart

AU - Murray, Michael

AU - Forster, Alan

AU - Pilcher, Nick

PY - 2016/7/14

Y1 - 2016/7/14

N2 - Delivering excellence in higher engineering education is dependent on many variables. This includes programme design, delivery and content, university support and the knowledge, experience and enthusiasm of faculty members. Over the past decade there has been a notable shift in engineering faculty recruitment policy. No longer is the professional and industrial experience of the engineering practitioner revered as a co-opted member of the engineering department. Despite their potential contribution as grounded, practical and relevant engineering lecturers, their impoverished knowledge of research funding mechanisms and lack of research capital is an acute disadvantage. This is a discussion paper exploring the marginalization of experienced practitioners in engineering education and the changing role of the educator as a career academic. The career academic is highly qualified and typically well versed in research activity; however, unlike their industrial counterparts they are devoid of any meaningful practical engineering experience. This changing role of the educator in engineering education has far-reaching consequences for teaching and learning and future industry skills. Given the longstanding connection between theory and practice in engineering education, this departure in pedagogical policy arguably signals the end of an era. The systematic fragmentation of engineering theory from industrial practice within higher education institutes arguably needs to be challenged. Recent government rhetoric to focus on the pedagogical aspects through a Teaching Excellence Framework is arguably aiming at the wrong target. Instead, reconstructing engineering programmes fit for the twenty-first century will require alternative teaching strategies, revitalised industrial advisory boards and uncommon leadership within engineering faculties.

AB - Delivering excellence in higher engineering education is dependent on many variables. This includes programme design, delivery and content, university support and the knowledge, experience and enthusiasm of faculty members. Over the past decade there has been a notable shift in engineering faculty recruitment policy. No longer is the professional and industrial experience of the engineering practitioner revered as a co-opted member of the engineering department. Despite their potential contribution as grounded, practical and relevant engineering lecturers, their impoverished knowledge of research funding mechanisms and lack of research capital is an acute disadvantage. This is a discussion paper exploring the marginalization of experienced practitioners in engineering education and the changing role of the educator as a career academic. The career academic is highly qualified and typically well versed in research activity; however, unlike their industrial counterparts they are devoid of any meaningful practical engineering experience. This changing role of the educator in engineering education has far-reaching consequences for teaching and learning and future industry skills. Given the longstanding connection between theory and practice in engineering education, this departure in pedagogical policy arguably signals the end of an era. The systematic fragmentation of engineering theory from industrial practice within higher education institutes arguably needs to be challenged. Recent government rhetoric to focus on the pedagogical aspects through a Teaching Excellence Framework is arguably aiming at the wrong target. Instead, reconstructing engineering programmes fit for the twenty-first century will require alternative teaching strategies, revitalised industrial advisory boards and uncommon leadership within engineering faculties.

KW - engineering education

KW - higher education

KW - industrial practice

M3 - Paper

SP - 271

EP - 278

ER -

Craig N, Tennant S, Murray M, Forster A, Pilcher N. The role of experienced practitioners in engineering education: the end of an era?. 2016. Paper presented at 6th International Symposium for Engineering Education, Sheffield, United Kingdom.