The Role of CCS in Industry Clusters in Delivering Value to the Political Economy

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Abstract

Government departments responsible for energy and climate policy around the world, partly informed by low carbon energy system projections, have demonstrated support for development of carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS). However, as evidenced by the 2015 withdrawal of financial support for the UK CCS Commercialisation Competition, it has proven challenging to convince national treasuries of the merits of public support. For those budget holders, CCS may essentially be seen as a complex, expensive pollution control system that requires extensive up-front investment and adds to production costs.
Our work at the Strathclyde Centre for Energy Policy (CEP) aims to move consideration of and narrative development around CCUS into the public policy domain that encompasses not only energy and climate, but also economic and social policies. An initial stage of our work culminated in 2018 through a series of policy briefing and research activities that had important impacts at Scottish, UK and European. This was through our evidence to the UK CCUS Cost Challenge Taskforce (see p.24 and recommendation #9 focussing on the need to assess value of CCUS to the wider UK economy) and our contribution to the 2019 Zero Emissions Platform report on ‘The Role of CCUS in a Below Two Degrees Scenario’. The former fed through to consideration of CCUS infrastructure in an industrial cluster context in the UK Government’s 2018 CCUS ‘Action Plan’.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Number of pages2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

political economy
industry
Values
energy policy
energy
climate policy
production costs
action plan
public support
commercialization
Carbon
Industry cluster
Political economy
withdrawal
control system
Economic Policy
projection
budget
public policy
climate

Keywords

  • CCS
  • carbon capture, use and storage
  • energy
  • economic multiplier
  • GDP
  • economic analysis

Cite this

@book{73cd54a6ce1848439c58066a12794177,
title = "The Role of CCS in Industry Clusters in Delivering Value to the Political Economy",
abstract = "Government departments responsible for energy and climate policy around the world, partly informed by low carbon energy system projections, have demonstrated support for development of carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS). However, as evidenced by the 2015 withdrawal of financial support for the UK CCS Commercialisation Competition, it has proven challenging to convince national treasuries of the merits of public support. For those budget holders, CCS may essentially be seen as a complex, expensive pollution control system that requires extensive up-front investment and adds to production costs.Our work at the Strathclyde Centre for Energy Policy (CEP) aims to move consideration of and narrative development around CCUS into the public policy domain that encompasses not only energy and climate, but also economic and social policies. An initial stage of our work culminated in 2018 through a series of policy briefing and research activities that had important impacts at Scottish, UK and European. This was through our evidence to the UK CCUS Cost Challenge Taskforce (see p.24 and recommendation #9 focussing on the need to assess value of CCUS to the wider UK economy) and our contribution to the 2019 Zero Emissions Platform report on ‘The Role of CCUS in a Below Two Degrees Scenario’. The former fed through to consideration of CCUS infrastructure in an industrial cluster context in the UK Government’s 2018 CCUS ‘Action Plan’.",
keywords = "CCS, carbon capture, use and storage, energy, economic multiplier, GDP, economic analysis",
author = "Karen Turner and Julia Race and Antonios Katris and Oluwafisayo Alabi",
note = "A Research Briefing published via the Centre for Energy Policy based at the University of Strathclyde.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.17868/68739",
language = "English",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - The Role of CCS in Industry Clusters in Delivering Value to the Political Economy

AU - Turner, Karen

AU - Race, Julia

AU - Katris, Antonios

AU - Alabi, Oluwafisayo

N1 - A Research Briefing published via the Centre for Energy Policy based at the University of Strathclyde.

PY - 2019/7/4

Y1 - 2019/7/4

N2 - Government departments responsible for energy and climate policy around the world, partly informed by low carbon energy system projections, have demonstrated support for development of carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS). However, as evidenced by the 2015 withdrawal of financial support for the UK CCS Commercialisation Competition, it has proven challenging to convince national treasuries of the merits of public support. For those budget holders, CCS may essentially be seen as a complex, expensive pollution control system that requires extensive up-front investment and adds to production costs.Our work at the Strathclyde Centre for Energy Policy (CEP) aims to move consideration of and narrative development around CCUS into the public policy domain that encompasses not only energy and climate, but also economic and social policies. An initial stage of our work culminated in 2018 through a series of policy briefing and research activities that had important impacts at Scottish, UK and European. This was through our evidence to the UK CCUS Cost Challenge Taskforce (see p.24 and recommendation #9 focussing on the need to assess value of CCUS to the wider UK economy) and our contribution to the 2019 Zero Emissions Platform report on ‘The Role of CCUS in a Below Two Degrees Scenario’. The former fed through to consideration of CCUS infrastructure in an industrial cluster context in the UK Government’s 2018 CCUS ‘Action Plan’.

AB - Government departments responsible for energy and climate policy around the world, partly informed by low carbon energy system projections, have demonstrated support for development of carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS). However, as evidenced by the 2015 withdrawal of financial support for the UK CCS Commercialisation Competition, it has proven challenging to convince national treasuries of the merits of public support. For those budget holders, CCS may essentially be seen as a complex, expensive pollution control system that requires extensive up-front investment and adds to production costs.Our work at the Strathclyde Centre for Energy Policy (CEP) aims to move consideration of and narrative development around CCUS into the public policy domain that encompasses not only energy and climate, but also economic and social policies. An initial stage of our work culminated in 2018 through a series of policy briefing and research activities that had important impacts at Scottish, UK and European. This was through our evidence to the UK CCUS Cost Challenge Taskforce (see p.24 and recommendation #9 focussing on the need to assess value of CCUS to the wider UK economy) and our contribution to the 2019 Zero Emissions Platform report on ‘The Role of CCUS in a Below Two Degrees Scenario’. The former fed through to consideration of CCUS infrastructure in an industrial cluster context in the UK Government’s 2018 CCUS ‘Action Plan’.

KW - CCS

KW - carbon capture, use and storage

KW - energy

KW - economic multiplier

KW - GDP

KW - economic analysis

UR - https://www.strath.ac.uk/humanities/centreforenergypolicy/

U2 - 10.17868/68739

DO - 10.17868/68739

M3 - Other report

BT - The Role of CCS in Industry Clusters in Delivering Value to the Political Economy

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -