The replication dilemma unravelled: how organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I examine how organizations address the replication dilemma by imultaneously enacting contrasting goals while transferring routines across complex organizational settings. I address this issue by drawing on a qualitative case-based inquiry into the multiplicity of the routines’ ostensive and performative aspects in the context of routine transfer and exact replication.
The subject of inquiry is a leading electronics organization facing the dilemma of how to deal with simultaneous competing pressures to copy exactly (replicate) and change (innovate). I find that organizational members address this dilemma (1) by harnessing artifacts and communities to establish two sets of ostensive patterns and performances, one supporting alignment
(replication) and one improvement (innovation), and (2) by striving to maintain a dynamic balance between them by enacting them in different proportions. This allows offsetting competing goals and the related pressures both at specific points in time and over time. Building on these findings, I develop a theoretical framework that adds to the extant replication and routines
literatures, and the Carnegie account of routine transfer and goal balancing, by capturing (1) the microlevel, performative dynamics by which organizations unravel the replication dilemma in routines transfer while addressing competing goals and the associated pressures and (2) the role of the social and material features of context in the (re)production and transfer of routines
LanguageEnglish
Pages1325 - 1350
Number of pages26
JournalOrganization Science
Volume25
Issue number5
Early online date16 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Electronic equipment
Innovation
Replication
Multiplicity
Proportion
Alignment
Theoretical framework

Keywords

  • routines theory
  • innovation
  • replication
  • artifacts
  • communities
  • organization theory
  • organization studies
  • materiality

Cite this

@article{9a6ff56d4bc44f2bb16755a36bf1f8cb,
title = "The replication dilemma unravelled: how organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer",
abstract = "I examine how organizations address the replication dilemma by imultaneously enacting contrasting goals while transferring routines across complex organizational settings. I address this issue by drawing on a qualitative case-based inquiry into the multiplicity of the routines’ ostensive and performative aspects in the context of routine transfer and exact replication.The subject of inquiry is a leading electronics organization facing the dilemma of how to deal with simultaneous competing pressures to copy exactly (replicate) and change (innovate). I find that organizational members address this dilemma (1) by harnessing artifacts and communities to establish two sets of ostensive patterns and performances, one supporting alignment(replication) and one improvement (innovation), and (2) by striving to maintain a dynamic balance between them by enacting them in different proportions. This allows offsetting competing goals and the related pressures both at specific points in time and over time. Building on these findings, I develop a theoretical framework that adds to the extant replication and routinesliteratures, and the Carnegie account of routine transfer and goal balancing, by capturing (1) the microlevel, performative dynamics by which organizations unravel the replication dilemma in routines transfer while addressing competing goals and the associated pressures and (2) the role of the social and material features of context in the (re)production and transfer of routines",
keywords = "routines theory, innovation, replication, artifacts, communities, organization theory, organization studies, materiality",
author = "Luciana D'Adderio",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.2014.0913",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1325 -- 1350",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
number = "5",

}

The replication dilemma unravelled : how organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. / D'Adderio, Luciana.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 25, No. 5, 01.10.2014, p. 1325 - 1350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The replication dilemma unravelled

T2 - Organization Science

AU - D'Adderio, Luciana

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - I examine how organizations address the replication dilemma by imultaneously enacting contrasting goals while transferring routines across complex organizational settings. I address this issue by drawing on a qualitative case-based inquiry into the multiplicity of the routines’ ostensive and performative aspects in the context of routine transfer and exact replication.The subject of inquiry is a leading electronics organization facing the dilemma of how to deal with simultaneous competing pressures to copy exactly (replicate) and change (innovate). I find that organizational members address this dilemma (1) by harnessing artifacts and communities to establish two sets of ostensive patterns and performances, one supporting alignment(replication) and one improvement (innovation), and (2) by striving to maintain a dynamic balance between them by enacting them in different proportions. This allows offsetting competing goals and the related pressures both at specific points in time and over time. Building on these findings, I develop a theoretical framework that adds to the extant replication and routinesliteratures, and the Carnegie account of routine transfer and goal balancing, by capturing (1) the microlevel, performative dynamics by which organizations unravel the replication dilemma in routines transfer while addressing competing goals and the associated pressures and (2) the role of the social and material features of context in the (re)production and transfer of routines

AB - I examine how organizations address the replication dilemma by imultaneously enacting contrasting goals while transferring routines across complex organizational settings. I address this issue by drawing on a qualitative case-based inquiry into the multiplicity of the routines’ ostensive and performative aspects in the context of routine transfer and exact replication.The subject of inquiry is a leading electronics organization facing the dilemma of how to deal with simultaneous competing pressures to copy exactly (replicate) and change (innovate). I find that organizational members address this dilemma (1) by harnessing artifacts and communities to establish two sets of ostensive patterns and performances, one supporting alignment(replication) and one improvement (innovation), and (2) by striving to maintain a dynamic balance between them by enacting them in different proportions. This allows offsetting competing goals and the related pressures both at specific points in time and over time. Building on these findings, I develop a theoretical framework that adds to the extant replication and routinesliteratures, and the Carnegie account of routine transfer and goal balancing, by capturing (1) the microlevel, performative dynamics by which organizations unravel the replication dilemma in routines transfer while addressing competing goals and the associated pressures and (2) the role of the social and material features of context in the (re)production and transfer of routines

KW - routines theory

KW - innovation

KW - replication

KW - artifacts

KW - communities

KW - organization theory

KW - organization studies

KW - materiality

UR - http://pubsonline.informs.org/journal/orsc

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2014.0913

DO - 10.1287/orsc.2014.0913

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1325

EP - 1350

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 5

ER -