Abstract
Understanding why parenting programmes work or do not work, and for whom, is crucial for development of more effective parenting interventions. In this paper we focus on a specific component of Mellow Bumps: reflection on one’s own childhood/past/life. We explore how this component was implemented, how participants engaged with it, the facilitating and constraining factors shaping this, whether and how it appeared to work, or not, and for whom. The paper analyses data from the Process Evaluation of the Trial of Healthy Relationships Initiatives for the Very Early years, which is evaluating two antenatal interventions delivered to vulnerable women, one of which is Mellow Bumps. Data were collected from January 2014 to June 2018 for 28 groups, 108 participants and 24 facilitators in a comprehensive and rigorous Process Evaluation designed to complement the Outcome Evaluation. Data were gathered at various time points using multiple methods, and were synthesised to triangulate findings. The reflective component was implemented with fidelity and participants engaged with it to varying degrees, dependent largely on the coherence of the group. Patchy attendance compromised the coherence of some groups, with the development of rapport, which is key to delivering reflective exercises, more difficult when group composition varied from week to week. Where there was a coherent group, powerful mechanisms of change, leading to stress reduction, included: relief through unburdening, empowerment through support given and received, reduced isolation through sharing anxieties, and control through self-care advice. A minority of highly vulnerable mothers seemed not to benefit from the reflective exercises and were marginalised within their groups. In order to minimise potential harmful effects of such exercises, allocation of participants to groups should strive to maximise group homogeneity. More research is needed to explore how very vulnerable parents can be supported in attending parenting interventions from start to finish.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e0215461 |
Journal | PLoS ONE |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Apr 2019 |
Funding
THRIVE was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme (PHR Project: 11/3002/01;) for which MH is the principle investigator, and KB and DW are co-investigators. Intervention Subvention Funding was provided by the Chief Scientist Office and Scottish Government (GN12KH589 THRIVE;https://www.cso.scot.nhs. uk/). KB, DW and MH also receive support for work on THRIVE via MRC/CSO Quinquennial funding of the Relationships and Health Improvement Programme, Medical Research Council / Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow (MC_UU_12017_11, MC_UU_12017/12, SPHSU12, and SPHSU11; https://www.gla.ac.uk/researchinstitutes/ healthwellbeing/research/ mrccsosocialandpublichealthsciencesunit/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Keywords
- reflection
- pregnancy
- parenting behaviour
- psychological stress
- emotions