The referendum and the role of the Electoral Commission

Aileen McHarg

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

On Wednesday, the Electoral Commission published its much anticipated reports on the question to be asked in the 2014 independence referendum and on campaign spending limits. On the referendum question, while the Commission found that the question proposed by the Scottish Government – ‘Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No’ – was easy to understand, to the point, not ambiguous, and did not mislead voters, there were nevertheless substantial concerns about the neutrality of the question. It therefore recommended a minor rewording – ‘Should Scotland be an independent country? Yes/No. It also recommended substantial increases on the campaign spending limits which had been proposed by the Scottish Government, in order to allow campaigning on a scale comparable to that for a Scottish Parliament election. Both recommendations were promptly accepted by the Scottish Government.
LanguageEnglish
TypeOnline Blog Entry
PublisherScottish Constitutional Futures Forum
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2013

Fingerprint

referendum
campaign
neutrality
parliament
election

Keywords

  • Scottish government
  • Electoral Commission
  • Scottish Parliament
  • independence referendum

Cite this

@misc{a774434aa6fb47ddb26fc81f24242e49,
title = "The referendum and the role of the Electoral Commission",
abstract = "On Wednesday, the Electoral Commission published its much anticipated reports on the question to be asked in the 2014 independence referendum and on campaign spending limits. On the referendum question, while the Commission found that the question proposed by the Scottish Government – ‘Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No’ – was easy to understand, to the point, not ambiguous, and did not mislead voters, there were nevertheless substantial concerns about the neutrality of the question. It therefore recommended a minor rewording – ‘Should Scotland be an independent country? Yes/No. It also recommended substantial increases on the campaign spending limits which had been proposed by the Scottish Government, in order to allow campaigning on a scale comparable to that for a Scottish Parliament election. Both recommendations were promptly accepted by the Scottish Government.",
keywords = "Scottish government, Electoral Commission, Scottish Parliament, independence referendum",
author = "Aileen McHarg",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
publisher = "Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum",
type = "Other",

}

The referendum and the role of the Electoral Commission. / McHarg, Aileen.

Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum. 2013, Online Blog Entry.

Research output: Other contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - The referendum and the role of the Electoral Commission

AU - McHarg, Aileen

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - On Wednesday, the Electoral Commission published its much anticipated reports on the question to be asked in the 2014 independence referendum and on campaign spending limits. On the referendum question, while the Commission found that the question proposed by the Scottish Government – ‘Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No’ – was easy to understand, to the point, not ambiguous, and did not mislead voters, there were nevertheless substantial concerns about the neutrality of the question. It therefore recommended a minor rewording – ‘Should Scotland be an independent country? Yes/No. It also recommended substantial increases on the campaign spending limits which had been proposed by the Scottish Government, in order to allow campaigning on a scale comparable to that for a Scottish Parliament election. Both recommendations were promptly accepted by the Scottish Government.

AB - On Wednesday, the Electoral Commission published its much anticipated reports on the question to be asked in the 2014 independence referendum and on campaign spending limits. On the referendum question, while the Commission found that the question proposed by the Scottish Government – ‘Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country? Yes/No’ – was easy to understand, to the point, not ambiguous, and did not mislead voters, there were nevertheless substantial concerns about the neutrality of the question. It therefore recommended a minor rewording – ‘Should Scotland be an independent country? Yes/No. It also recommended substantial increases on the campaign spending limits which had been proposed by the Scottish Government, in order to allow campaigning on a scale comparable to that for a Scottish Parliament election. Both recommendations were promptly accepted by the Scottish Government.

KW - Scottish government

KW - Electoral Commission

KW - Scottish Parliament

KW - independence referendum

UR - http://www.scottishconstitutionalfutures.org/OpinionandAnalysis/ViewBlogPost/tabid/1767/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/1043/Aileen-McHarg-The-Referendum-and-the-Role-of-the-Electoral-Commission.aspx

M3 - Other contribution

PB - Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum

ER -