The realism that did not speak its name: E.H. Carr's diplomatic histories of the twenty years' crisis

Keith Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

E.H. Carr was one of Europe’s preeminent thinkers in the field of international affairs. Yet his contribution to International Relations theory is continually questioned. Realists depict Carr as a quintessential realist; revisionists draw from his wider corpus to qualify his contribution. Although not inaccurate, the revisionist literature is incomplete as it neglects a number of Carr’s diplomatic histories. Refocusing on these, especially the manner in which traces of Ranke’s the primacy of foreign affairs tradition are evident, this paper points to a more conservative and less critical Carr. Utilising an interpretivist framework, this shift in traditions of thought is explained by the dilemmas Carr faced. Although works of history rather than theory, the paper contends that Carr’s diplomatic histories remain relevant, particularly with regard to the embedded criticism of realpolitik they contain. This realisation is made evident through a reading of Carr in parallel with the concept of tragedy.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalReview of International Studies
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 22 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

realism
history
international relations
neglect
criticism
literature

Keywords

  • EH Carr
  • realism
  • appeasement
  • international affairs
  • international relations theory
  • revisionist
  • realist
  • foreign affairs

Cite this

@article{67063cb858474f019918aa3ebbfc8792,
title = "The realism that did not speak its name: E.H. Carr's diplomatic histories of the twenty years' crisis",
abstract = "E.H. Carr was one of Europe’s preeminent thinkers in the field of international affairs. Yet his contribution to International Relations theory is continually questioned. Realists depict Carr as a quintessential realist; revisionists draw from his wider corpus to qualify his contribution. Although not inaccurate, the revisionist literature is incomplete as it neglects a number of Carr’s diplomatic histories. Refocusing on these, especially the manner in which traces of Ranke’s the primacy of foreign affairs tradition are evident, this paper points to a more conservative and less critical Carr. Utilising an interpretivist framework, this shift in traditions of thought is explained by the dilemmas Carr faced. Although works of history rather than theory, the paper contends that Carr’s diplomatic histories remain relevant, particularly with regard to the embedded criticism of realpolitik they contain. This realisation is made evident through a reading of Carr in parallel with the concept of tragedy.",
keywords = "EH Carr, realism, appeasement, international affairs, international relations theory, revisionist, realist, foreign affairs",
author = "Keith Smith",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "22",
language = "English",
journal = "Review of International Studies",
issn = "0260-2105",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The realism that did not speak its name

T2 - Review of International Studies

AU - Smith, Keith

PY - 2016/12/22

Y1 - 2016/12/22

N2 - E.H. Carr was one of Europe’s preeminent thinkers in the field of international affairs. Yet his contribution to International Relations theory is continually questioned. Realists depict Carr as a quintessential realist; revisionists draw from his wider corpus to qualify his contribution. Although not inaccurate, the revisionist literature is incomplete as it neglects a number of Carr’s diplomatic histories. Refocusing on these, especially the manner in which traces of Ranke’s the primacy of foreign affairs tradition are evident, this paper points to a more conservative and less critical Carr. Utilising an interpretivist framework, this shift in traditions of thought is explained by the dilemmas Carr faced. Although works of history rather than theory, the paper contends that Carr’s diplomatic histories remain relevant, particularly with regard to the embedded criticism of realpolitik they contain. This realisation is made evident through a reading of Carr in parallel with the concept of tragedy.

AB - E.H. Carr was one of Europe’s preeminent thinkers in the field of international affairs. Yet his contribution to International Relations theory is continually questioned. Realists depict Carr as a quintessential realist; revisionists draw from his wider corpus to qualify his contribution. Although not inaccurate, the revisionist literature is incomplete as it neglects a number of Carr’s diplomatic histories. Refocusing on these, especially the manner in which traces of Ranke’s the primacy of foreign affairs tradition are evident, this paper points to a more conservative and less critical Carr. Utilising an interpretivist framework, this shift in traditions of thought is explained by the dilemmas Carr faced. Although works of history rather than theory, the paper contends that Carr’s diplomatic histories remain relevant, particularly with regard to the embedded criticism of realpolitik they contain. This realisation is made evident through a reading of Carr in parallel with the concept of tragedy.

KW - EH Carr

KW - realism

KW - appeasement

KW - international affairs

KW - international relations theory

KW - revisionist

KW - realist

KW - foreign affairs

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies

M3 - Article

JO - Review of International Studies

JF - Review of International Studies

SN - 0260-2105

ER -