The question of evil and feminist legal scholarship

N. Whitty, T. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we argue that feminist legal scholars should engage directly and explicitly with the question of evil. Part I summarises key facts surrounding the prosecution and life-long imprisonment of Myra Hindley, one of a tiny number of women involved in multiple killings of children in recent British history. Part II reviews a range of commentaries on Hindley, noting in particular the repeated use of two narratives: the first of these insists that Hindley is an icon of female evil; the second, less popular one, seeks to position her as a victim. In Part III, the article broadens out and we explain why we think feminist legal scholars should look at the question of evil. In large part, the emphasis is on anticipating the range of possible objections to this argument, and on trying to answer these objections by showing how a focus on evil might benefit feminist legal thinking - specifically in relation to the categories of perpetrator and victim and, more generally, in relation to laws motivated by a desire to secure women's human rights.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-26
Number of pages25
JournalFeminist Legal Studies
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

imprisonment
prosecution
human rights
narrative
Law
history

Keywords

  • feminist legal scholarship
  • women
  • law
  • crime

Cite this

Whitty, N. ; Murphy, T. / The question of evil and feminist legal scholarship. In: Feminist Legal Studies. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 1-26.
@article{6d82a424f4de458eacff20654c13563b,
title = "The question of evil and feminist legal scholarship",
abstract = "In this article, we argue that feminist legal scholars should engage directly and explicitly with the question of evil. Part I summarises key facts surrounding the prosecution and life-long imprisonment of Myra Hindley, one of a tiny number of women involved in multiple killings of children in recent British history. Part II reviews a range of commentaries on Hindley, noting in particular the repeated use of two narratives: the first of these insists that Hindley is an icon of female evil; the second, less popular one, seeks to position her as a victim. In Part III, the article broadens out and we explain why we think feminist legal scholars should look at the question of evil. In large part, the emphasis is on anticipating the range of possible objections to this argument, and on trying to answer these objections by showing how a focus on evil might benefit feminist legal thinking - specifically in relation to the categories of perpetrator and victim and, more generally, in relation to laws motivated by a desire to secure women's human rights.",
keywords = "feminist legal scholarship, women, law, crime",
author = "N. Whitty and T. Murphy",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/s10691-006-9012-3",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Feminist Legal Studies",
issn = "0966-3622",
number = "1",

}

The question of evil and feminist legal scholarship. / Whitty, N.; Murphy, T.

In: Feminist Legal Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2006, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The question of evil and feminist legal scholarship

AU - Whitty, N.

AU - Murphy, T.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - In this article, we argue that feminist legal scholars should engage directly and explicitly with the question of evil. Part I summarises key facts surrounding the prosecution and life-long imprisonment of Myra Hindley, one of a tiny number of women involved in multiple killings of children in recent British history. Part II reviews a range of commentaries on Hindley, noting in particular the repeated use of two narratives: the first of these insists that Hindley is an icon of female evil; the second, less popular one, seeks to position her as a victim. In Part III, the article broadens out and we explain why we think feminist legal scholars should look at the question of evil. In large part, the emphasis is on anticipating the range of possible objections to this argument, and on trying to answer these objections by showing how a focus on evil might benefit feminist legal thinking - specifically in relation to the categories of perpetrator and victim and, more generally, in relation to laws motivated by a desire to secure women's human rights.

AB - In this article, we argue that feminist legal scholars should engage directly and explicitly with the question of evil. Part I summarises key facts surrounding the prosecution and life-long imprisonment of Myra Hindley, one of a tiny number of women involved in multiple killings of children in recent British history. Part II reviews a range of commentaries on Hindley, noting in particular the repeated use of two narratives: the first of these insists that Hindley is an icon of female evil; the second, less popular one, seeks to position her as a victim. In Part III, the article broadens out and we explain why we think feminist legal scholars should look at the question of evil. In large part, the emphasis is on anticipating the range of possible objections to this argument, and on trying to answer these objections by showing how a focus on evil might benefit feminist legal thinking - specifically in relation to the categories of perpetrator and victim and, more generally, in relation to laws motivated by a desire to secure women's human rights.

KW - feminist legal scholarship

KW - women

KW - law

KW - crime

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9012-3

U2 - 10.1007/s10691-006-9012-3

DO - 10.1007/s10691-006-9012-3

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Feminist Legal Studies

T2 - Feminist Legal Studies

JF - Feminist Legal Studies

SN - 0966-3622

IS - 1

ER -