The Psychology of why organisations can be slow to adapt and change

George Wright, Kees van der Heijden, Ron M. Bradfield, George Burt, George Cairns

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article discusses what can be done about bias in human decision making to make organizations adapt to change. In conclusion, individuals follow cognitive habits, seeing challenging situations through a singular frame of reference that makes assumptions about the nature of problems or opportunities that arise. Additionally, we feel that our judgment is good. Furthermore, this perception is reinforced by both the confirmation bias and the hindsight bias that underpin an inappropriate confidence in our judgment. Such over-confidence will lead to inappropriate best-guess thinking about the future--as illustrated in our earlier case studies of strategic inertia or business-as-usual thinking. Our analysis illustrated that the risks were perceived to be serious if the company did not change its current failing strategy and, also, that the risks were seen to be serious if the company did change the strategy. There was strong evidence that the senior management team attempted to shift responsibility for its adherence to the current strategy to the top level board of directors--that is, buck passing. Additionally, the management team also evidenced delay and procrastination--whilst bolstering the current failing strategy
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)21-36
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of General Management
    Volume29
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    Psychology
    Board of directors
    Hindsight bias
    Frame of reference
    Adherence
    Team management
    Senior management
    Confidence
    Overconfidence
    Habit
    Confirmation bias
    Inertia
    Decision making
    Responsibility
    Procrastination

    Keywords

    • psychology
    • organisations
    • general management
    • decision making
    • judgment
    • strategy

    Cite this

    Wright, G., van der Heijden, K., Bradfield, R. M., Burt, G., & Cairns, G. (2004). The Psychology of why organisations can be slow to adapt and change. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 21-36.
    Wright, George ; van der Heijden, Kees ; Bradfield, Ron M. ; Burt, George ; Cairns, George. / The Psychology of why organisations can be slow to adapt and change. In: Journal of General Management. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 21-36.
    @article{abd1622524b4432497b9fce60ab284c8,
    title = "The Psychology of why organisations can be slow to adapt and change",
    abstract = "This article discusses what can be done about bias in human decision making to make organizations adapt to change. In conclusion, individuals follow cognitive habits, seeing challenging situations through a singular frame of reference that makes assumptions about the nature of problems or opportunities that arise. Additionally, we feel that our judgment is good. Furthermore, this perception is reinforced by both the confirmation bias and the hindsight bias that underpin an inappropriate confidence in our judgment. Such over-confidence will lead to inappropriate best-guess thinking about the future--as illustrated in our earlier case studies of strategic inertia or business-as-usual thinking. Our analysis illustrated that the risks were perceived to be serious if the company did not change its current failing strategy and, also, that the risks were seen to be serious if the company did change the strategy. There was strong evidence that the senior management team attempted to shift responsibility for its adherence to the current strategy to the top level board of directors--that is, buck passing. Additionally, the management team also evidenced delay and procrastination--whilst bolstering the current failing strategy",
    keywords = "psychology, organisations, general management, decision making, judgment, strategy",
    author = "George Wright and {van der Heijden}, Kees and Bradfield, {Ron M.} and George Burt and George Cairns",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "21--36",
    journal = "Journal of General Management",
    issn = "0306-3070",
    publisher = "Braybrooke Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    Wright, G, van der Heijden, K, Bradfield, RM, Burt, G & Cairns, G 2004, 'The Psychology of why organisations can be slow to adapt and change', Journal of General Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 21-36.

    The Psychology of why organisations can be slow to adapt and change. / Wright, George; van der Heijden, Kees; Bradfield, Ron M.; Burt, George; Cairns, George.

    In: Journal of General Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2004, p. 21-36.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Psychology of why organisations can be slow to adapt and change

    AU - Wright, George

    AU - van der Heijden, Kees

    AU - Bradfield, Ron M.

    AU - Burt, George

    AU - Cairns, George

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - This article discusses what can be done about bias in human decision making to make organizations adapt to change. In conclusion, individuals follow cognitive habits, seeing challenging situations through a singular frame of reference that makes assumptions about the nature of problems or opportunities that arise. Additionally, we feel that our judgment is good. Furthermore, this perception is reinforced by both the confirmation bias and the hindsight bias that underpin an inappropriate confidence in our judgment. Such over-confidence will lead to inappropriate best-guess thinking about the future--as illustrated in our earlier case studies of strategic inertia or business-as-usual thinking. Our analysis illustrated that the risks were perceived to be serious if the company did not change its current failing strategy and, also, that the risks were seen to be serious if the company did change the strategy. There was strong evidence that the senior management team attempted to shift responsibility for its adherence to the current strategy to the top level board of directors--that is, buck passing. Additionally, the management team also evidenced delay and procrastination--whilst bolstering the current failing strategy

    AB - This article discusses what can be done about bias in human decision making to make organizations adapt to change. In conclusion, individuals follow cognitive habits, seeing challenging situations through a singular frame of reference that makes assumptions about the nature of problems or opportunities that arise. Additionally, we feel that our judgment is good. Furthermore, this perception is reinforced by both the confirmation bias and the hindsight bias that underpin an inappropriate confidence in our judgment. Such over-confidence will lead to inappropriate best-guess thinking about the future--as illustrated in our earlier case studies of strategic inertia or business-as-usual thinking. Our analysis illustrated that the risks were perceived to be serious if the company did not change its current failing strategy and, also, that the risks were seen to be serious if the company did change the strategy. There was strong evidence that the senior management team attempted to shift responsibility for its adherence to the current strategy to the top level board of directors--that is, buck passing. Additionally, the management team also evidenced delay and procrastination--whilst bolstering the current failing strategy

    KW - psychology

    KW - organisations

    KW - general management

    KW - decision making

    KW - judgment

    KW - strategy

    UR - http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=14447004&site=ehost-live

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 21

    EP - 36

    JO - Journal of General Management

    JF - Journal of General Management

    SN - 0306-3070

    IS - 4

    ER -