The psychological assessment of learning potential

Fraser Lauchlan, J. Elliot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The paper considers the construct of learning potential (or dynamic assessment) and its use in the psychoeducational assessment of children with learning difficulties. Aims. The principal research aim was to examine the extent to which learning potential (dynamic) assessment can predict which children with severe learning difficulties will gain most from a structured programme of cognitive intervention. Sample. The sample consisted of 30 children (mean age 9 years) based in a school for children with moderate/severe learning difficulties. Methods. Half of the children were assessed both before and after the delivery of a 15-month cognitive intervention programme undertaken by the first author. The other half took part in the assessments but continued with their usual classroom programme. Assessments included the use of both dynamic and static measures. On the basis of the assessments, students were divided into high and low potential groups and comparison of gains after the intervention was undertaken. Results. The measurement of learning potential appeared to predict subsequent performance in some, but not all, areas. Those who were most likely to make gains were those children deemed as ‘ high potential’ who also received the cognitive intervention. Conclusions. The value of learning potential assessment was not clearly demonstrated. The implications of the results are explored and, in particular, the authors warn of the dangers of drawing upon the results of learning potential measures in an inappropriate fashion. (school) psychologists, the complexity of the measures, ongoing debates validity and applicability and the pressures from resource managers for clearcut psychometric results have tended to deter all but the practitioner.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)647-665
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Psychology
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2001

Fingerprint

Learning
Psychology
learning disorder
learning
school psychologist
psychometrics
Psychometrics
manager
classroom
Students
Pressure
resources
school
performance
Research
Group
student

Keywords

  • learning potential
  • dynamic assessment
  • psychoeducational assessment
  • learning difficulties

Cite this

Lauchlan, Fraser ; Elliot, J. / The psychological assessment of learning potential. In: British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001 ; Vol. 71, No. 4. pp. 647-665.
@article{fa71408e1de74a4b867561add664f862,
title = "The psychological assessment of learning potential",
abstract = "Background. The paper considers the construct of learning potential (or dynamic assessment) and its use in the psychoeducational assessment of children with learning difficulties. Aims. The principal research aim was to examine the extent to which learning potential (dynamic) assessment can predict which children with severe learning difficulties will gain most from a structured programme of cognitive intervention. Sample. The sample consisted of 30 children (mean age 9 years) based in a school for children with moderate/severe learning difficulties. Methods. Half of the children were assessed both before and after the delivery of a 15-month cognitive intervention programme undertaken by the first author. The other half took part in the assessments but continued with their usual classroom programme. Assessments included the use of both dynamic and static measures. On the basis of the assessments, students were divided into high and low potential groups and comparison of gains after the intervention was undertaken. Results. The measurement of learning potential appeared to predict subsequent performance in some, but not all, areas. Those who were most likely to make gains were those children deemed as ‘ high potential’ who also received the cognitive intervention. Conclusions. The value of learning potential assessment was not clearly demonstrated. The implications of the results are explored and, in particular, the authors warn of the dangers of drawing upon the results of learning potential measures in an inappropriate fashion. (school) psychologists, the complexity of the measures, ongoing debates validity and applicability and the pressures from resource managers for clearcut psychometric results have tended to deter all but the practitioner.",
keywords = "learning potential , dynamic assessment, psychoeducational assessment, learning difficulties",
author = "Fraser Lauchlan and J. Elliot",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1348/000709901158712",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "647--665",
journal = "British Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0007-0998",
number = "4",

}

The psychological assessment of learning potential. / Lauchlan, Fraser; Elliot, J.

In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 4, 12.2001, p. 647-665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychological assessment of learning potential

AU - Lauchlan, Fraser

AU - Elliot, J.

PY - 2001/12

Y1 - 2001/12

N2 - Background. The paper considers the construct of learning potential (or dynamic assessment) and its use in the psychoeducational assessment of children with learning difficulties. Aims. The principal research aim was to examine the extent to which learning potential (dynamic) assessment can predict which children with severe learning difficulties will gain most from a structured programme of cognitive intervention. Sample. The sample consisted of 30 children (mean age 9 years) based in a school for children with moderate/severe learning difficulties. Methods. Half of the children were assessed both before and after the delivery of a 15-month cognitive intervention programme undertaken by the first author. The other half took part in the assessments but continued with their usual classroom programme. Assessments included the use of both dynamic and static measures. On the basis of the assessments, students were divided into high and low potential groups and comparison of gains after the intervention was undertaken. Results. The measurement of learning potential appeared to predict subsequent performance in some, but not all, areas. Those who were most likely to make gains were those children deemed as ‘ high potential’ who also received the cognitive intervention. Conclusions. The value of learning potential assessment was not clearly demonstrated. The implications of the results are explored and, in particular, the authors warn of the dangers of drawing upon the results of learning potential measures in an inappropriate fashion. (school) psychologists, the complexity of the measures, ongoing debates validity and applicability and the pressures from resource managers for clearcut psychometric results have tended to deter all but the practitioner.

AB - Background. The paper considers the construct of learning potential (or dynamic assessment) and its use in the psychoeducational assessment of children with learning difficulties. Aims. The principal research aim was to examine the extent to which learning potential (dynamic) assessment can predict which children with severe learning difficulties will gain most from a structured programme of cognitive intervention. Sample. The sample consisted of 30 children (mean age 9 years) based in a school for children with moderate/severe learning difficulties. Methods. Half of the children were assessed both before and after the delivery of a 15-month cognitive intervention programme undertaken by the first author. The other half took part in the assessments but continued with their usual classroom programme. Assessments included the use of both dynamic and static measures. On the basis of the assessments, students were divided into high and low potential groups and comparison of gains after the intervention was undertaken. Results. The measurement of learning potential appeared to predict subsequent performance in some, but not all, areas. Those who were most likely to make gains were those children deemed as ‘ high potential’ who also received the cognitive intervention. Conclusions. The value of learning potential assessment was not clearly demonstrated. The implications of the results are explored and, in particular, the authors warn of the dangers of drawing upon the results of learning potential measures in an inappropriate fashion. (school) psychologists, the complexity of the measures, ongoing debates validity and applicability and the pressures from resource managers for clearcut psychometric results have tended to deter all but the practitioner.

KW - learning potential

KW - dynamic assessment

KW - psychoeducational assessment

KW - learning difficulties

U2 - 10.1348/000709901158712

DO - 10.1348/000709901158712

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 647

EP - 665

JO - British Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - British Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0007-0998

IS - 4

ER -