The problem with 'dots': questioning the role of rationality in the online environment

Mark Leiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Regulatory theorists often use the ‘dot’ as a metaphor to help conceptualise their models of a given environment. Lessig famously used the ‘pathetic dot’ in his classic, ‘Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace’ and Murray’s ‘Regulation of Cyberspace’ used interconnected dots to help describe networked communitarianism and to discuss the effectiveness and implementation of symbiotic regulation. However in both models, the dot is seen as a rational actor. The rational ‘dot’ is presumed to have a complete set of preferences and the ability to gather all the necessary information in order to make an informed decision that optimally reflects their choices and preferences. However, research from psychology and, increasingly, economics has shown that humans are often prone to making errors in judgements. The paper argues that using the metaphor of dots to describe how rational actors behave in the digital environment is problematic. Actors deploy heuristics when making judgements, resulting in systematic errors and biases, often compromising the assumptions of the regulator. Accordingly, the way actors behave in the online environment is not rational at all; thus, models built on rationality start from a false premise.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Review of Law, Computers and Technology
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 May 2016

Fingerprint

rationality
virtual reality
metaphor
regulation
Systematic errors
heuristics
psychology
Economics
Law
ability
trend
economics

Keywords

  • heuristics
  • rationality
  • internet regulation
  • cyberspace
  • internet
  • social media
  • behavioural economics
  • symbiotic regulation
  • networked communitarianism

Cite this

@article{778f1f05dee04e638f63be6d17d0613a,
title = "The problem with 'dots': questioning the role of rationality in the online environment",
abstract = "Regulatory theorists often use the ‘dot’ as a metaphor to help conceptualise their models of a given environment. Lessig famously used the ‘pathetic dot’ in his classic, ‘Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace’ and Murray’s ‘Regulation of Cyberspace’ used interconnected dots to help describe networked communitarianism and to discuss the effectiveness and implementation of symbiotic regulation. However in both models, the dot is seen as a rational actor. The rational ‘dot’ is presumed to have a complete set of preferences and the ability to gather all the necessary information in order to make an informed decision that optimally reflects their choices and preferences. However, research from psychology and, increasingly, economics has shown that humans are often prone to making errors in judgements. The paper argues that using the metaphor of dots to describe how rational actors behave in the digital environment is problematic. Actors deploy heuristics when making judgements, resulting in systematic errors and biases, often compromising the assumptions of the regulator. Accordingly, the way actors behave in the online environment is not rational at all; thus, models built on rationality start from a false premise.",
keywords = "heuristics, rationality, internet regulation, cyberspace, internet, social media, behavioural economics, symbiotic regulation, networked communitarianism",
author = "Mark Leiser",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Review of Law, Computers and Technology on 23/05/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13600869.2016.1145952",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/13600869.2016.1145952",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
journal = "International Review of Law, Computers and Technology",
issn = "1360-0869",
number = "3",

}

The problem with 'dots': questioning the role of rationality in the online environment. / Leiser, Mark.

In: International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 23.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The problem with 'dots': questioning the role of rationality in the online environment

AU - Leiser, Mark

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Review of Law, Computers and Technology on 23/05/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13600869.2016.1145952

PY - 2016/5/23

Y1 - 2016/5/23

N2 - Regulatory theorists often use the ‘dot’ as a metaphor to help conceptualise their models of a given environment. Lessig famously used the ‘pathetic dot’ in his classic, ‘Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace’ and Murray’s ‘Regulation of Cyberspace’ used interconnected dots to help describe networked communitarianism and to discuss the effectiveness and implementation of symbiotic regulation. However in both models, the dot is seen as a rational actor. The rational ‘dot’ is presumed to have a complete set of preferences and the ability to gather all the necessary information in order to make an informed decision that optimally reflects their choices and preferences. However, research from psychology and, increasingly, economics has shown that humans are often prone to making errors in judgements. The paper argues that using the metaphor of dots to describe how rational actors behave in the digital environment is problematic. Actors deploy heuristics when making judgements, resulting in systematic errors and biases, often compromising the assumptions of the regulator. Accordingly, the way actors behave in the online environment is not rational at all; thus, models built on rationality start from a false premise.

AB - Regulatory theorists often use the ‘dot’ as a metaphor to help conceptualise their models of a given environment. Lessig famously used the ‘pathetic dot’ in his classic, ‘Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace’ and Murray’s ‘Regulation of Cyberspace’ used interconnected dots to help describe networked communitarianism and to discuss the effectiveness and implementation of symbiotic regulation. However in both models, the dot is seen as a rational actor. The rational ‘dot’ is presumed to have a complete set of preferences and the ability to gather all the necessary information in order to make an informed decision that optimally reflects their choices and preferences. However, research from psychology and, increasingly, economics has shown that humans are often prone to making errors in judgements. The paper argues that using the metaphor of dots to describe how rational actors behave in the digital environment is problematic. Actors deploy heuristics when making judgements, resulting in systematic errors and biases, often compromising the assumptions of the regulator. Accordingly, the way actors behave in the online environment is not rational at all; thus, models built on rationality start from a false premise.

KW - heuristics

KW - rationality

KW - internet regulation

KW - cyberspace

KW - internet

KW - social media

KW - behavioural economics

KW - symbiotic regulation

KW - networked communitarianism

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cirl20

U2 - 10.1080/13600869.2016.1145952

DO - 10.1080/13600869.2016.1145952

M3 - Article

VL - 30

JO - International Review of Law, Computers and Technology

JF - International Review of Law, Computers and Technology

SN - 1360-0869

IS - 3

ER -