The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe

Jakob Edler, Martin Berger, Michael Dinges, Abdullah Gök

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article characterizes and analyses evaluation practice in national innovation policy across Europe. It is the first study that examines and interprets the characteristics, quality, usefulness, and consequences of evaluations in a systematic way. The analysis is based on the comprehensive INNO-Appraisal repository of 171 evaluation reports of national innovation policies of EU25 countries, conducted between 2002 and 2007. The article seeks (1) to assess the state of the art of evaluation in innovation policy at national level, (2) to understand how different key dimensions of evaluation (timing, purpose, methods, tendering process, etc.) relate to each other, and (3) to explore types of evaluations. On that basis, we (4) draw lessons as to what constitutes good practice in evaluation, as the results of the survey have been exchanged and discussed with a number of policy makers of the sample responsible for the evaluation. The article thus both contributes to the academic understanding of policy evaluation and supports use in policy practice. © 2012 The Author.
LanguageEnglish
Pages167-182
Number of pages16
JournalEducational Research and Evaluation
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

innovation policy
evaluation
best practice

Keywords

  • evaluation
  • evaluation practice
  • evaluation typology
  • innovation policy

Cite this

Edler, Jakob ; Berger, Martin ; Dinges, Michael ; Gök, Abdullah. / The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe. In: Educational Research and Evaluation. 2012 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 167-182.
@article{86a5c9755f044125928a49622e2d8d8e,
title = "The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe",
abstract = "This article characterizes and analyses evaluation practice in national innovation policy across Europe. It is the first study that examines and interprets the characteristics, quality, usefulness, and consequences of evaluations in a systematic way. The analysis is based on the comprehensive INNO-Appraisal repository of 171 evaluation reports of national innovation policies of EU25 countries, conducted between 2002 and 2007. The article seeks (1) to assess the state of the art of evaluation in innovation policy at national level, (2) to understand how different key dimensions of evaluation (timing, purpose, methods, tendering process, etc.) relate to each other, and (3) to explore types of evaluations. On that basis, we (4) draw lessons as to what constitutes good practice in evaluation, as the results of the survey have been exchanged and discussed with a number of policy makers of the sample responsible for the evaluation. The article thus both contributes to the academic understanding of policy evaluation and supports use in policy practice. {\circledC} 2012 The Author.",
keywords = "evaluation, evaluation practice, evaluation typology, innovation policy",
author = "Jakob Edler and Martin Berger and Michael Dinges and Abdullah G{\"o}k",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1093/reseval/rvs014",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "167--182",
journal = "Educational Research and Evaluation",
issn = "1380-3611",
number = "3",

}

The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe. / Edler, Jakob; Berger, Martin; Dinges, Michael; Gök, Abdullah.

In: Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 21, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 167-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe

AU - Edler, Jakob

AU - Berger, Martin

AU - Dinges, Michael

AU - Gök, Abdullah

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - This article characterizes and analyses evaluation practice in national innovation policy across Europe. It is the first study that examines and interprets the characteristics, quality, usefulness, and consequences of evaluations in a systematic way. The analysis is based on the comprehensive INNO-Appraisal repository of 171 evaluation reports of national innovation policies of EU25 countries, conducted between 2002 and 2007. The article seeks (1) to assess the state of the art of evaluation in innovation policy at national level, (2) to understand how different key dimensions of evaluation (timing, purpose, methods, tendering process, etc.) relate to each other, and (3) to explore types of evaluations. On that basis, we (4) draw lessons as to what constitutes good practice in evaluation, as the results of the survey have been exchanged and discussed with a number of policy makers of the sample responsible for the evaluation. The article thus both contributes to the academic understanding of policy evaluation and supports use in policy practice. © 2012 The Author.

AB - This article characterizes and analyses evaluation practice in national innovation policy across Europe. It is the first study that examines and interprets the characteristics, quality, usefulness, and consequences of evaluations in a systematic way. The analysis is based on the comprehensive INNO-Appraisal repository of 171 evaluation reports of national innovation policies of EU25 countries, conducted between 2002 and 2007. The article seeks (1) to assess the state of the art of evaluation in innovation policy at national level, (2) to understand how different key dimensions of evaluation (timing, purpose, methods, tendering process, etc.) relate to each other, and (3) to explore types of evaluations. On that basis, we (4) draw lessons as to what constitutes good practice in evaluation, as the results of the survey have been exchanged and discussed with a number of policy makers of the sample responsible for the evaluation. The article thus both contributes to the academic understanding of policy evaluation and supports use in policy practice. © 2012 The Author.

KW - evaluation

KW - evaluation practice

KW - evaluation typology

KW - innovation policy

U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvs014

DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvs014

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 167

EP - 182

JO - Educational Research and Evaluation

T2 - Educational Research and Evaluation

JF - Educational Research and Evaluation

SN - 1380-3611

IS - 3

ER -