The practical significance of confidentiality in mediation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article analyses the practical importance of confidentiality and privilege in mediation with particular emphasis on issues of disclosure of what occurred in a mediation and compellability of mediators in any subsequent litigation. The piece focuses on the gap between the theory behind confidentiality in mediation – i.e. that it is largely assured in the process – and the reality in which the privacy of mediation, protected by and large by the general without prejudice rules, may be rendered far more porous in practice. The article suggests that mediation would benefit from the statutory development of rules pertaining to confidentiality that undergird the process itself and in this sense analyses two extant provisions that already apply in the UK in relation to cross border mediations, and family mediation in Scotland respectively which could provide a model for more general reform
LanguageEnglish
Pages74-97
Number of pages24
JournalCivil Justice Quarterly
Volume37
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

mediation
prejudice
privilege
privacy
reform

Keywords

  • mediation
  • confidentiality
  • resolution
  • negotiation

Cite this

@article{edaa6d5399594bfbbebb85b1ecb358b1,
title = "The practical significance of confidentiality in mediation",
abstract = "This article analyses the practical importance of confidentiality and privilege in mediation with particular emphasis on issues of disclosure of what occurred in a mediation and compellability of mediators in any subsequent litigation. The piece focuses on the gap between the theory behind confidentiality in mediation – i.e. that it is largely assured in the process – and the reality in which the privacy of mediation, protected by and large by the general without prejudice rules, may be rendered far more porous in practice. The article suggests that mediation would benefit from the statutory development of rules pertaining to confidentiality that undergird the process itself and in this sense analyses two extant provisions that already apply in the UK in relation to cross border mediations, and family mediation in Scotland respectively which could provide a model for more general reform",
keywords = "mediation, confidentiality, resolution, negotiation",
author = "Andrew Agapiou and Bryan Clark",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "74--97",
journal = "Civil Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0261-9261",
number = "1",

}

The practical significance of confidentiality in mediation. / Agapiou, Andrew; Clark, Bryan.

In: Civil Justice Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 74-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practical significance of confidentiality in mediation

AU - Agapiou, Andrew

AU - Clark, Bryan

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article analyses the practical importance of confidentiality and privilege in mediation with particular emphasis on issues of disclosure of what occurred in a mediation and compellability of mediators in any subsequent litigation. The piece focuses on the gap between the theory behind confidentiality in mediation – i.e. that it is largely assured in the process – and the reality in which the privacy of mediation, protected by and large by the general without prejudice rules, may be rendered far more porous in practice. The article suggests that mediation would benefit from the statutory development of rules pertaining to confidentiality that undergird the process itself and in this sense analyses two extant provisions that already apply in the UK in relation to cross border mediations, and family mediation in Scotland respectively which could provide a model for more general reform

AB - This article analyses the practical importance of confidentiality and privilege in mediation with particular emphasis on issues of disclosure of what occurred in a mediation and compellability of mediators in any subsequent litigation. The piece focuses on the gap between the theory behind confidentiality in mediation – i.e. that it is largely assured in the process – and the reality in which the privacy of mediation, protected by and large by the general without prejudice rules, may be rendered far more porous in practice. The article suggests that mediation would benefit from the statutory development of rules pertaining to confidentiality that undergird the process itself and in this sense analyses two extant provisions that already apply in the UK in relation to cross border mediations, and family mediation in Scotland respectively which could provide a model for more general reform

KW - mediation

KW - confidentiality

KW - resolution

KW - negotiation

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 74

EP - 97

JO - Civil Justice Quarterly

T2 - Civil Justice Quarterly

JF - Civil Justice Quarterly

SN - 0261-9261

IS - 1

ER -