The place of writing in social work: bridging the theory-practice divide

Gavin Heron, Rowena Murray

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Summary: Despite the rhetoric surrounding the merits of practitioners' contributions, writing for publication in social work continues to be an activity dominated by academics. Furthermore, it could be argued that the influence of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) is reshaping what can be considered as quality research. This article examines the nature of writing for publication within social work and gives particular focus to residential child care, where the problem is most striking, although this discussion will have relevance for professionals in other social work settings. We argue that without greater involvement of practitioners, quality research may be quite narrowly defined. Findings: There would appear to be minimal discussion of the absence of practitioner writing in the social work literature. The causes for this absence have not been fully explored; potential factors, such as inequality, barriers to writing and current education and training programmes, have not been addressed as fully as in other professions. Applications: This focus on academic writing shows the need for a more inclusive approach to social work practice and research. There is a need for further discussion of strategies to involve residential child care practitioners in research.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages199-214
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Social Work
    Volume4
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004

    Fingerprint

    theory-practice
    Social Work
    social work
    Research
    Child Care
    child care
    Publications
    Education
    training program
    rhetoric
    profession
    cause
    education

    Keywords

    • academics
    • practitioners
    • qualifications
    • research assessment exercise
    • writing
    • social work

    Cite this

    @article{7e3090dcb8694b02bd9924b6e234d920,
    title = "The place of writing in social work: bridging the theory-practice divide",
    abstract = "Summary: Despite the rhetoric surrounding the merits of practitioners' contributions, writing for publication in social work continues to be an activity dominated by academics. Furthermore, it could be argued that the influence of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) is reshaping what can be considered as quality research. This article examines the nature of writing for publication within social work and gives particular focus to residential child care, where the problem is most striking, although this discussion will have relevance for professionals in other social work settings. We argue that without greater involvement of practitioners, quality research may be quite narrowly defined. Findings: There would appear to be minimal discussion of the absence of practitioner writing in the social work literature. The causes for this absence have not been fully explored; potential factors, such as inequality, barriers to writing and current education and training programmes, have not been addressed as fully as in other professions. Applications: This focus on academic writing shows the need for a more inclusive approach to social work practice and research. There is a need for further discussion of strategies to involve residential child care practitioners in research.",
    keywords = "academics, practitioners, qualifications, research assessment exercise, writing, social work",
    author = "Gavin Heron and Rowena Murray",
    year = "2004",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1177/1468017304045410",
    language = "English",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "199--214",
    journal = "Journal of Social Work",
    issn = "1468-0173",
    number = "2",

    }

    The place of writing in social work: bridging the theory-practice divide. / Heron, Gavin; Murray, Rowena.

    In: Journal of Social Work, Vol. 4, No. 2, 08.2004, p. 199-214.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The place of writing in social work: bridging the theory-practice divide

    AU - Heron, Gavin

    AU - Murray, Rowena

    PY - 2004/8

    Y1 - 2004/8

    N2 - Summary: Despite the rhetoric surrounding the merits of practitioners' contributions, writing for publication in social work continues to be an activity dominated by academics. Furthermore, it could be argued that the influence of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) is reshaping what can be considered as quality research. This article examines the nature of writing for publication within social work and gives particular focus to residential child care, where the problem is most striking, although this discussion will have relevance for professionals in other social work settings. We argue that without greater involvement of practitioners, quality research may be quite narrowly defined. Findings: There would appear to be minimal discussion of the absence of practitioner writing in the social work literature. The causes for this absence have not been fully explored; potential factors, such as inequality, barriers to writing and current education and training programmes, have not been addressed as fully as in other professions. Applications: This focus on academic writing shows the need for a more inclusive approach to social work practice and research. There is a need for further discussion of strategies to involve residential child care practitioners in research.

    AB - Summary: Despite the rhetoric surrounding the merits of practitioners' contributions, writing for publication in social work continues to be an activity dominated by academics. Furthermore, it could be argued that the influence of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) is reshaping what can be considered as quality research. This article examines the nature of writing for publication within social work and gives particular focus to residential child care, where the problem is most striking, although this discussion will have relevance for professionals in other social work settings. We argue that without greater involvement of practitioners, quality research may be quite narrowly defined. Findings: There would appear to be minimal discussion of the absence of practitioner writing in the social work literature. The causes for this absence have not been fully explored; potential factors, such as inequality, barriers to writing and current education and training programmes, have not been addressed as fully as in other professions. Applications: This focus on academic writing shows the need for a more inclusive approach to social work practice and research. There is a need for further discussion of strategies to involve residential child care practitioners in research.

    KW - academics

    KW - practitioners

    KW - qualifications

    KW - research assessment exercise

    KW - writing

    KW - social work

    UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468017304045410

    U2 - 10.1177/1468017304045410

    DO - 10.1177/1468017304045410

    M3 - Article

    VL - 4

    SP - 199

    EP - 214

    JO - Journal of Social Work

    T2 - Journal of Social Work

    JF - Journal of Social Work

    SN - 1468-0173

    IS - 2

    ER -