The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics

Luciana D'Adderio

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    134 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Drawing from advances in Organisational Studies and recent debates within Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Financial Markets, this paper proposes a theoretical framework that characterises the mutual adaptation between formal routines and rules, on one hand, and actual performances, on the other, as iterative cycles of framing, overflowing and reframing of knowledge inputs and actions. This framework, combined with the ethnographic observation of the ‘engineering freeze’ process at a leading automotive manufacturer, allows us to advance Routine Theory by (1) capturing the dynamics of convergence and divergence between procedures and performances; and (2) improving our understanding of the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routine evolution.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages769–789
    Number of pages21
    JournalResearch Policy
    Volume37
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

    Fingerprint

    Drawing (graphics)
    Economics
    Financial markets
    Theorizing
    Performativity

    Keywords

    • organisational routines
    • performativity
    • standard operating procedures and rules
    • artefacts
    • communities of practice

    Cite this

    @article{e115af29a97941d298be02a4251d3aac,
    title = "The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics",
    abstract = "Drawing from advances in Organisational Studies and recent debates within Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Financial Markets, this paper proposes a theoretical framework that characterises the mutual adaptation between formal routines and rules, on one hand, and actual performances, on the other, as iterative cycles of framing, overflowing and reframing of knowledge inputs and actions. This framework, combined with the ethnographic observation of the ‘engineering freeze’ process at a leading automotive manufacturer, allows us to advance Routine Theory by (1) capturing the dynamics of convergence and divergence between procedures and performances; and (2) improving our understanding of the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routine evolution.",
    keywords = "organisational routines, performativity, standard operating procedures and rules, artefacts, communities of practice",
    author = "Luciana D'Adderio",
    year = "2008",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "769–789",
    journal = "Research Policy",
    issn = "0048-7333",
    number = "5",

    }

    The performativity of routines : theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. / D'Adderio, Luciana.

    In: Research Policy, Vol. 37, No. 5, 06.2008, p. 769–789.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The performativity of routines

    T2 - Research Policy

    AU - D'Adderio, Luciana

    PY - 2008/6

    Y1 - 2008/6

    N2 - Drawing from advances in Organisational Studies and recent debates within Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Financial Markets, this paper proposes a theoretical framework that characterises the mutual adaptation between formal routines and rules, on one hand, and actual performances, on the other, as iterative cycles of framing, overflowing and reframing of knowledge inputs and actions. This framework, combined with the ethnographic observation of the ‘engineering freeze’ process at a leading automotive manufacturer, allows us to advance Routine Theory by (1) capturing the dynamics of convergence and divergence between procedures and performances; and (2) improving our understanding of the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routine evolution.

    AB - Drawing from advances in Organisational Studies and recent debates within Economic Sociology and the Sociology of Financial Markets, this paper proposes a theoretical framework that characterises the mutual adaptation between formal routines and rules, on one hand, and actual performances, on the other, as iterative cycles of framing, overflowing and reframing of knowledge inputs and actions. This framework, combined with the ethnographic observation of the ‘engineering freeze’ process at a leading automotive manufacturer, allows us to advance Routine Theory by (1) capturing the dynamics of convergence and divergence between procedures and performances; and (2) improving our understanding of the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routine evolution.

    KW - organisational routines

    KW - performativity

    KW - standard operating procedures and rules

    KW - artefacts

    KW - communities of practice

    U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012

    DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012

    M3 - Article

    VL - 37

    SP - 769

    EP - 789

    JO - Research Policy

    JF - Research Policy

    SN - 0048-7333

    IS - 5

    ER -