The Performance Framework in Cohesion Policy: Expectations and Reality

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

An increased performance orientation has been a cornerstone of the 2014-20 programmes. For ESI Funds, a key element of the shift towards a stronger performance orientation is the application of a Performance Framework (PF) which involves the establishment of clear, measurable milestones and targets to ensure progress in implementation. In the case of OPs under the investment for growth and jobs goal, the PF is linked to a Performance Review, carried out by DG REGIO in 2019. If the Performance Review shows the milestones set in the PF have been met, a Performance Reserve is made available for use by the Managing Authorities (MAs), which is 6 percent of OP funding. For the PF, MAs can set targets in the form of indicators or, so-called, key implementation steps. Indicators can be financial indicators or output indicators, and these can be either common indicators suggested by the European Commission (EC) or programme-specific (result indicators are only used for the ESF). Key implementation steps can also be used in cases where no outputs are expected by 2018.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
Number of pages52
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2017

Publication series

NameIQ-Net Thematic Paper
PublisherEPRC
No.2
Volume41

Fingerprint

group cohesion
performance
European Commission
funding

Keywords

  • cohesion policy
  • structural funds
  • performance framework
  • ERDF

Cite this

@book{f74dc839fc074bc9920fd209b1b3c3a0,
title = "The Performance Framework in Cohesion Policy: Expectations and Reality",
abstract = "An increased performance orientation has been a cornerstone of the 2014-20 programmes. For ESI Funds, a key element of the shift towards a stronger performance orientation is the application of a Performance Framework (PF) which involves the establishment of clear, measurable milestones and targets to ensure progress in implementation. In the case of OPs under the investment for growth and jobs goal, the PF is linked to a Performance Review, carried out by DG REGIO in 2019. If the Performance Review shows the milestones set in the PF have been met, a Performance Reserve is made available for use by the Managing Authorities (MAs), which is 6 percent of OP funding. For the PF, MAs can set targets in the form of indicators or, so-called, key implementation steps. Indicators can be financial indicators or output indicators, and these can be either common indicators suggested by the European Commission (EC) or programme-specific (result indicators are only used for the ESF). Key implementation steps can also be used in cases where no outputs are expected by 2018.",
keywords = "cohesion policy, structural funds, performance framework, ERDF",
author = "Irene McMaster and Stefan Kah",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "31",
language = "English",
series = "IQ-Net Thematic Paper",
publisher = "EPRC",
number = "2",

}

The Performance Framework in Cohesion Policy : Expectations and Reality. / McMaster, Irene; Kah, Stefan.

Glasgow, 2017. 52 p. (IQ-Net Thematic Paper; Vol. 41, No. 2).

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - The Performance Framework in Cohesion Policy

T2 - Expectations and Reality

AU - McMaster, Irene

AU - Kah, Stefan

PY - 2017/12/31

Y1 - 2017/12/31

N2 - An increased performance orientation has been a cornerstone of the 2014-20 programmes. For ESI Funds, a key element of the shift towards a stronger performance orientation is the application of a Performance Framework (PF) which involves the establishment of clear, measurable milestones and targets to ensure progress in implementation. In the case of OPs under the investment for growth and jobs goal, the PF is linked to a Performance Review, carried out by DG REGIO in 2019. If the Performance Review shows the milestones set in the PF have been met, a Performance Reserve is made available for use by the Managing Authorities (MAs), which is 6 percent of OP funding. For the PF, MAs can set targets in the form of indicators or, so-called, key implementation steps. Indicators can be financial indicators or output indicators, and these can be either common indicators suggested by the European Commission (EC) or programme-specific (result indicators are only used for the ESF). Key implementation steps can also be used in cases where no outputs are expected by 2018.

AB - An increased performance orientation has been a cornerstone of the 2014-20 programmes. For ESI Funds, a key element of the shift towards a stronger performance orientation is the application of a Performance Framework (PF) which involves the establishment of clear, measurable milestones and targets to ensure progress in implementation. In the case of OPs under the investment for growth and jobs goal, the PF is linked to a Performance Review, carried out by DG REGIO in 2019. If the Performance Review shows the milestones set in the PF have been met, a Performance Reserve is made available for use by the Managing Authorities (MAs), which is 6 percent of OP funding. For the PF, MAs can set targets in the form of indicators or, so-called, key implementation steps. Indicators can be financial indicators or output indicators, and these can be either common indicators suggested by the European Commission (EC) or programme-specific (result indicators are only used for the ESF). Key implementation steps can also be used in cases where no outputs are expected by 2018.

KW - cohesion policy

KW - structural funds

KW - performance framework

KW - ERDF

UR - http://www.eprc-strath.eu/iqnet

M3 - Commissioned report

T3 - IQ-Net Thematic Paper

BT - The Performance Framework in Cohesion Policy

CY - Glasgow

ER -