The numbers game - 3

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

The number 3: When investing in energy efficiency
measures what number should be used?
In the mid 90's Britain's largest bank was one of the first
companies to sign up for the Energy Efficiency Office's
"Making a Corporate Commitment " campaign. Although
subsequently trumpeting its achievements in a glossy
brochure, buried in the text was the admission that only,
"projects with a 3 year or less pay-back period would be
considered for capital investment".
Their energy bill was less than 1% of their costs. They
invested less than 1.25% of this energy bill in energy
efficiency measures. No objective performance indicators
were published in the report, but the reader was left in no
doubt as to their 'green' credentials. If the same criteria
were to be adopted in the domestic sector, based on the
Family Expenditure Survey from the same era, it would
have allowed the average householder to invest 83p per
annum; a sum that was some way short of that needed to
buy one 12W low energy light bulb! Although we know
from Mao that the longest journey must start modestly, is
completing the first step really sufficient grounds for glossy
brochures and triumphalism?
LanguageEnglish
Pages12-12
Number of pages1
Volume36
No.winter 06-07
Specialist publicationScotregen, Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Energy
Expenditure
Journey
Admission
Costs
Reader

Keywords

  • energy efficiency
  • buildings
  • carbon

Cite this

Howieson, Stirling. / The numbers game - 3. In: Scotregen, Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum. 2007 ; Vol. 36, No. winter 06-07. pp. 12-12.
@misc{c5a8b199e92041a58450149b99c88c0b,
title = "The numbers game - 3",
abstract = "The number 3: When investing in energy efficiencymeasures what number should be used?In the mid 90's Britain's largest bank was one of the firstcompanies to sign up for the Energy Efficiency Office's{"}Making a Corporate Commitment {"} campaign. Althoughsubsequently trumpeting its achievements in a glossybrochure, buried in the text was the admission that only,{"}projects with a 3 year or less pay-back period would beconsidered for capital investment{"}.Their energy bill was less than 1{\%} of their costs. Theyinvested less than 1.25{\%} of this energy bill in energyefficiency measures. No objective performance indicatorswere published in the report, but the reader was left in nodoubt as to their 'green' credentials. If the same criteriawere to be adopted in the domestic sector, based on theFamily Expenditure Survey from the same era, it wouldhave allowed the average householder to invest 83p perannum; a sum that was some way short of that needed tobuy one 12W low energy light bulb! Although we knowfrom Mao that the longest journey must start modestly, iscompleting the first step really sufficient grounds for glossybrochures and triumphalism?",
keywords = "energy efficiency, buildings, carbon",
author = "Stirling Howieson",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "12--12",
journal = "Scotregen, Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum",

}

The numbers game - 3. / Howieson, Stirling.

In: Scotregen, Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum, Vol. 36, No. winter 06-07, 2007, p. 12-12.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - The numbers game - 3

AU - Howieson, Stirling

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The number 3: When investing in energy efficiencymeasures what number should be used?In the mid 90's Britain's largest bank was one of the firstcompanies to sign up for the Energy Efficiency Office's"Making a Corporate Commitment " campaign. Althoughsubsequently trumpeting its achievements in a glossybrochure, buried in the text was the admission that only,"projects with a 3 year or less pay-back period would beconsidered for capital investment".Their energy bill was less than 1% of their costs. Theyinvested less than 1.25% of this energy bill in energyefficiency measures. No objective performance indicatorswere published in the report, but the reader was left in nodoubt as to their 'green' credentials. If the same criteriawere to be adopted in the domestic sector, based on theFamily Expenditure Survey from the same era, it wouldhave allowed the average householder to invest 83p perannum; a sum that was some way short of that needed tobuy one 12W low energy light bulb! Although we knowfrom Mao that the longest journey must start modestly, iscompleting the first step really sufficient grounds for glossybrochures and triumphalism?

AB - The number 3: When investing in energy efficiencymeasures what number should be used?In the mid 90's Britain's largest bank was one of the firstcompanies to sign up for the Energy Efficiency Office's"Making a Corporate Commitment " campaign. Althoughsubsequently trumpeting its achievements in a glossybrochure, buried in the text was the admission that only,"projects with a 3 year or less pay-back period would beconsidered for capital investment".Their energy bill was less than 1% of their costs. Theyinvested less than 1.25% of this energy bill in energyefficiency measures. No objective performance indicatorswere published in the report, but the reader was left in nodoubt as to their 'green' credentials. If the same criteriawere to be adopted in the domestic sector, based on theFamily Expenditure Survey from the same era, it wouldhave allowed the average householder to invest 83p perannum; a sum that was some way short of that needed tobuy one 12W low energy light bulb! Although we knowfrom Mao that the longest journey must start modestly, iscompleting the first step really sufficient grounds for glossybrochures and triumphalism?

KW - energy efficiency

KW - buildings

KW - carbon

UR - http://www.scotregen.co.uk/pdf.pl?file=surf/news/Scotregen 36.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 12

EP - 12

JO - Scotregen, Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum

T2 - Scotregen, Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum

JF - Scotregen, Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum

ER -