The non-linguistic in poetic language. A generative approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article follows a generative approach to language, which argues that language is in part organized by rules and conditions which are specific to language. In Chomsky (Syntactic Structures, 1957), which is the foundational statement of generative linguistics, an example of a language specific rule was the ›transformational rule‹. This means that language may also be subject to other modes of organization, including linear concatenation, or counting, or rules of sequential ordering, which are not specific to language: these are the ›non-linguistic‹ modes of organization of language. In this article I identify some of the non-linguistic modes of organization as they appear in poetic language, and suggest that many aspects of poetic language must in fact be seen as non-linguistic in this sense. This violates a widely-stated hypothesis held by many linguists (at least since Sapir) who work on poetry, that poetic language is a development of the rules or conditions or processes of non-poetic (ordinary) language: this is the ›development hypothesis‹.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-18
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Literary Theory
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Language
Generative
Poetic Language
Poetry
Generative Linguistics
Noam Chomsky
Syntactic Structure
Transformational Rules
Ordinary Language

Keywords

  • language
  • poetic language
  • linguistic processes

Cite this

@article{b764ddceda1241e1985363fe80ba14e4,
title = "The non-linguistic in poetic language. A generative approach",
abstract = "This article follows a generative approach to language, which argues that language is in part organized by rules and conditions which are specific to language. In Chomsky (Syntactic Structures, 1957), which is the foundational statement of generative linguistics, an example of a language specific rule was the ›transformational rule‹. This means that language may also be subject to other modes of organization, including linear concatenation, or counting, or rules of sequential ordering, which are not specific to language: these are the ›non-linguistic‹ modes of organization of language. In this article I identify some of the non-linguistic modes of organization as they appear in poetic language, and suggest that many aspects of poetic language must in fact be seen as non-linguistic in this sense. This violates a widely-stated hypothesis held by many linguists (at least since Sapir) who work on poetry, that poetic language is a development of the rules or conditions or processes of non-poetic (ordinary) language: this is the ›development hypothesis‹.",
keywords = "language, poetic language, linguistic processes",
author = "Nigel Fabb",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1515/JLT.2010.002",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Journal of Literary Theory",
issn = "1862-5290",
number = "1",

}

The non-linguistic in poetic language. A generative approach. / Fabb, Nigel.

In: Journal of Literary Theory, Vol. 4, No. 1, 04.11.2010, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The non-linguistic in poetic language. A generative approach

AU - Fabb, Nigel

PY - 2010/11/4

Y1 - 2010/11/4

N2 - This article follows a generative approach to language, which argues that language is in part organized by rules and conditions which are specific to language. In Chomsky (Syntactic Structures, 1957), which is the foundational statement of generative linguistics, an example of a language specific rule was the ›transformational rule‹. This means that language may also be subject to other modes of organization, including linear concatenation, or counting, or rules of sequential ordering, which are not specific to language: these are the ›non-linguistic‹ modes of organization of language. In this article I identify some of the non-linguistic modes of organization as they appear in poetic language, and suggest that many aspects of poetic language must in fact be seen as non-linguistic in this sense. This violates a widely-stated hypothesis held by many linguists (at least since Sapir) who work on poetry, that poetic language is a development of the rules or conditions or processes of non-poetic (ordinary) language: this is the ›development hypothesis‹.

AB - This article follows a generative approach to language, which argues that language is in part organized by rules and conditions which are specific to language. In Chomsky (Syntactic Structures, 1957), which is the foundational statement of generative linguistics, an example of a language specific rule was the ›transformational rule‹. This means that language may also be subject to other modes of organization, including linear concatenation, or counting, or rules of sequential ordering, which are not specific to language: these are the ›non-linguistic‹ modes of organization of language. In this article I identify some of the non-linguistic modes of organization as they appear in poetic language, and suggest that many aspects of poetic language must in fact be seen as non-linguistic in this sense. This violates a widely-stated hypothesis held by many linguists (at least since Sapir) who work on poetry, that poetic language is a development of the rules or conditions or processes of non-poetic (ordinary) language: this is the ›development hypothesis‹.

KW - language

KW - poetic language

KW - linguistic processes

U2 - 10.1515/JLT.2010.002

DO - 10.1515/JLT.2010.002

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Literary Theory

T2 - Journal of Literary Theory

JF - Journal of Literary Theory

SN - 1862-5290

IS - 1

ER -