The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between the aspiring working-class poet and the newspaper press has always been crucial. Indeed, it is possible to argue that at least from the late eighteenth century onwards, every laboring-class or working-class poet had a significant relationship with the press. In the case of many, like Robert Burns, the relationship was vexed. As Lucyle Werkmeister’s detailed studies have shown, Burns sent a number of poems to London and local newspapers in the late 1780s and 1790s, both pseudonymously and under his own name, and developed relationships with editors like Peter Stuart of the London Star. “I would scorn to put my name to a Newspaper Poem,” he wrote to one friend; yet, in a letter to Stuart in the same week, he observed that “I am charmed with your paper. I wish it was more in my power to contribute to it” and gave Stuart license to do what he wished with the poems Burns sent him, short of publishing Burns’s name with them (Burns 405, 407). Burns valued the press for its publication of political poems, though as a government employee, he had to be cautious, running into trouble when satirical poems on Establishment figures were wrongly attributed to him, or when editors were unable to resist adding his name to his own satires (see Werkmeister). John Clare, as Eric Robinson has shown, was also an avid reader of and contributor to the newspaper press, local and national, though the extent of his contributions has still not been fully traced. Burns and Clare, who was supported and championed by the London Morning Post, had a status that entitled them to consideration by the London papers. As the press expanded and expanded again in the course of the nineteenth century, however, and as the rise of literacy and the prior reputation of poets like Burns increased the number of would-be working-class poets, the primary relationship tended to be between a working-class poet and one or more of their local newspapers.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationA History of British Working-Class Literature
EditorsJohn Goodridge, Bridget Keegan
Place of PublicationCambridge
Chapter16
Pages264-280
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781108105392
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2017

Fingerprint

Poet
Poem
Working Class
Victorian Era
Names
Employees
Literacy
Scorn
Robert Burns
Wishes
Satire
1780s
Letters
Rise
1790s
Government
Reader
John Clare

Keywords

  • working class
  • poetry
  • newspaper history

Cite this

Blair, K. (2017). The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet. In J. Goodridge, & B. Keegan (Eds.), A History of British Working-Class Literature (pp. 264-280). Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108105392.018
Blair, Kirstie. / The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet. A History of British Working-Class Literature. editor / John Goodridge ; Bridget Keegan. Cambridge, 2017. pp. 264-280
@inbook{2522ab0946ce4e0e91aa17627037d582,
title = "The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet",
abstract = "The relationship between the aspiring working-class poet and the newspaper press has always been crucial. Indeed, it is possible to argue that at least from the late eighteenth century onwards, every laboring-class or working-class poet had a significant relationship with the press. In the case of many, like Robert Burns, the relationship was vexed. As Lucyle Werkmeister’s detailed studies have shown, Burns sent a number of poems to London and local newspapers in the late 1780s and 1790s, both pseudonymously and under his own name, and developed relationships with editors like Peter Stuart of the London Star. “I would scorn to put my name to a Newspaper Poem,” he wrote to one friend; yet, in a letter to Stuart in the same week, he observed that “I am charmed with your paper. I wish it was more in my power to contribute to it” and gave Stuart license to do what he wished with the poems Burns sent him, short of publishing Burns’s name with them (Burns 405, 407). Burns valued the press for its publication of political poems, though as a government employee, he had to be cautious, running into trouble when satirical poems on Establishment figures were wrongly attributed to him, or when editors were unable to resist adding his name to his own satires (see Werkmeister). John Clare, as Eric Robinson has shown, was also an avid reader of and contributor to the newspaper press, local and national, though the extent of his contributions has still not been fully traced. Burns and Clare, who was supported and championed by the London Morning Post, had a status that entitled them to consideration by the London papers. As the press expanded and expanded again in the course of the nineteenth century, however, and as the rise of literacy and the prior reputation of poets like Burns increased the number of would-be working-class poets, the primary relationship tended to be between a working-class poet and one or more of their local newspapers.",
keywords = "working class, poetry, newspaper history",
author = "Kirstie Blair",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1017/9781108105392.018",
language = "English",
pages = "264--280",
editor = "John Goodridge and Bridget Keegan",
booktitle = "A History of British Working-Class Literature",

}

Blair, K 2017, The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet. in J Goodridge & B Keegan (eds), A History of British Working-Class Literature. Cambridge, pp. 264-280. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108105392.018

The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet. / Blair, Kirstie.

A History of British Working-Class Literature. ed. / John Goodridge; Bridget Keegan. Cambridge, 2017. p. 264-280.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet

AU - Blair, Kirstie

PY - 2017/5/31

Y1 - 2017/5/31

N2 - The relationship between the aspiring working-class poet and the newspaper press has always been crucial. Indeed, it is possible to argue that at least from the late eighteenth century onwards, every laboring-class or working-class poet had a significant relationship with the press. In the case of many, like Robert Burns, the relationship was vexed. As Lucyle Werkmeister’s detailed studies have shown, Burns sent a number of poems to London and local newspapers in the late 1780s and 1790s, both pseudonymously and under his own name, and developed relationships with editors like Peter Stuart of the London Star. “I would scorn to put my name to a Newspaper Poem,” he wrote to one friend; yet, in a letter to Stuart in the same week, he observed that “I am charmed with your paper. I wish it was more in my power to contribute to it” and gave Stuart license to do what he wished with the poems Burns sent him, short of publishing Burns’s name with them (Burns 405, 407). Burns valued the press for its publication of political poems, though as a government employee, he had to be cautious, running into trouble when satirical poems on Establishment figures were wrongly attributed to him, or when editors were unable to resist adding his name to his own satires (see Werkmeister). John Clare, as Eric Robinson has shown, was also an avid reader of and contributor to the newspaper press, local and national, though the extent of his contributions has still not been fully traced. Burns and Clare, who was supported and championed by the London Morning Post, had a status that entitled them to consideration by the London papers. As the press expanded and expanded again in the course of the nineteenth century, however, and as the rise of literacy and the prior reputation of poets like Burns increased the number of would-be working-class poets, the primary relationship tended to be between a working-class poet and one or more of their local newspapers.

AB - The relationship between the aspiring working-class poet and the newspaper press has always been crucial. Indeed, it is possible to argue that at least from the late eighteenth century onwards, every laboring-class or working-class poet had a significant relationship with the press. In the case of many, like Robert Burns, the relationship was vexed. As Lucyle Werkmeister’s detailed studies have shown, Burns sent a number of poems to London and local newspapers in the late 1780s and 1790s, both pseudonymously and under his own name, and developed relationships with editors like Peter Stuart of the London Star. “I would scorn to put my name to a Newspaper Poem,” he wrote to one friend; yet, in a letter to Stuart in the same week, he observed that “I am charmed with your paper. I wish it was more in my power to contribute to it” and gave Stuart license to do what he wished with the poems Burns sent him, short of publishing Burns’s name with them (Burns 405, 407). Burns valued the press for its publication of political poems, though as a government employee, he had to be cautious, running into trouble when satirical poems on Establishment figures were wrongly attributed to him, or when editors were unable to resist adding his name to his own satires (see Werkmeister). John Clare, as Eric Robinson has shown, was also an avid reader of and contributor to the newspaper press, local and national, though the extent of his contributions has still not been fully traced. Burns and Clare, who was supported and championed by the London Morning Post, had a status that entitled them to consideration by the London papers. As the press expanded and expanded again in the course of the nineteenth century, however, and as the rise of literacy and the prior reputation of poets like Burns increased the number of would-be working-class poets, the primary relationship tended to be between a working-class poet and one or more of their local newspapers.

KW - working class

KW - poetry

KW - newspaper history

UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/history-of-british-working-class-literature/F332FDF6B63682CD5FA48350584826D0

U2 - 10.1017/9781108105392.018

DO - 10.1017/9781108105392.018

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SP - 264

EP - 280

BT - A History of British Working-Class Literature

A2 - Goodridge, John

A2 - Keegan, Bridget

CY - Cambridge

ER -

Blair K. The newspaper press and the Victorian working-class poet. In Goodridge J, Keegan B, editors, A History of British Working-Class Literature. Cambridge. 2017. p. 264-280 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108105392.018