The negligible effects of miscut on indium aluminium nitride growth

Thomas Sadler*, Fabien Massabuau, Menno Kappers, Rachel Oliver

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

InAlN has many potential applications in photonics and electronics, but the growth rate of high quality material with smooth surfaces remains low, at ∼4 nm/min, preventing its wider use in thicker structures such as distributed Bragg reflectors, although this is not a significant problem for thin structures like high electron mobility transistors. We have investigated the effects of the vicinal miscut angle on InAlN growth with the hope of increasing the growth rate at higher miscuts, whilst maintaining a smooth surface. InAlN/GaN/Sapphire structures were grown on substrates with three different miscuts (0°, 0.25° and 0.5°) according to two different recipes, with different growth rates. This change in substrate miscut angle had no effect on either the growth rate, the indium incorporation or the surface morphology assessed by atomic force microscopy. Both the surface roughness and the volume of indium present on the surface as indium droplets were unaffected. This negative result suggests that even when the terraces on the underlying pseudo-substrate are very closely spaced InAlN growth does not proceed by a step flow mode once epilayers are approximately 100 nm thick (although these results cannot be extrapolated to very thin layers). It also demonstrates that differing miscut angle is not an explanation for any differing properties of material produced by different groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-464
Number of pages4
JournalPhysica Status Solidi C
Volume9
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2012

Keywords

  • atomic force microscopy
  • III-nitrides
  • InAlN
  • metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The negligible effects of miscut on indium aluminium nitride growth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this