The need to amend IMO's EEDI to include a threshold for performance in waves (realistic sea conditions) to achieve the desired GHG reductions

Elizabeth Lindstad, Henning Borgen, Gunnar S. Eskeland, Christopher Paalson, Harilaos Psaraftis, Osman Turan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has established the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) as the most important policy measure to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping. A vessel's EEDI is based on sea trials at delivery, and vessels cannot exceed a threshold for emitted CO2 per ton-mile, depending on vessel type and size. From other industries such as cars we have learnt that testing methods must reflect realistic operating conditions to deliver the desired emission reductions. Present sea-trial procedures for EEDI adjust to 'calm water conditions' only, as a comparative basis, despite calm sea being the exception at sea. We find that this adjustment procedure excessively rewards full bodied 'bulky' hulls which perform well in calm water conditions. In contrast, hull forms optimized with respect to performance in realistic sea-conditions are not rewarded with the current EEDI procedures. Our results indicate that without adjusting the testing cycle requirements to also include a threshold for performance in waves (real sea), the desired reductions will be short on targets and GHG emissions could potentially increase.

LanguageEnglish
Article number3668
JournalSustainability
Volume11
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Greenhouse gases
energy efficiency
Energy efficiency
greenhouse gas
energy
efficiency
Gas emissions
performance
vessel
hull
Testing
Freight transportation
Water
water
Railroad cars
testing method
shipping
reward
sea
index

Keywords

  • EEDI
  • IMO
  • maritime transport
  • performance in real sea
  • sea trial test

Cite this

Lindstad, Elizabeth ; Borgen, Henning ; Eskeland, Gunnar S. ; Paalson, Christopher ; Psaraftis, Harilaos ; Turan, Osman. / The need to amend IMO's EEDI to include a threshold for performance in waves (realistic sea conditions) to achieve the desired GHG reductions. In: Sustainability. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 13.
@article{cafca740580e4fd08d728d146a9461c8,
title = "The need to amend IMO's EEDI to include a threshold for performance in waves (realistic sea conditions) to achieve the desired GHG reductions",
abstract = "The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has established the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) as the most important policy measure to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping. A vessel's EEDI is based on sea trials at delivery, and vessels cannot exceed a threshold for emitted CO2 per ton-mile, depending on vessel type and size. From other industries such as cars we have learnt that testing methods must reflect realistic operating conditions to deliver the desired emission reductions. Present sea-trial procedures for EEDI adjust to 'calm water conditions' only, as a comparative basis, despite calm sea being the exception at sea. We find that this adjustment procedure excessively rewards full bodied 'bulky' hulls which perform well in calm water conditions. In contrast, hull forms optimized with respect to performance in realistic sea-conditions are not rewarded with the current EEDI procedures. Our results indicate that without adjusting the testing cycle requirements to also include a threshold for performance in waves (real sea), the desired reductions will be short on targets and GHG emissions could potentially increase.",
keywords = "EEDI, IMO, maritime transport, performance in real sea, sea trial test",
author = "Elizabeth Lindstad and Henning Borgen and Eskeland, {Gunnar S.} and Christopher Paalson and Harilaos Psaraftis and Osman Turan",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3390/su11133668",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
number = "13",

}

The need to amend IMO's EEDI to include a threshold for performance in waves (realistic sea conditions) to achieve the desired GHG reductions. / Lindstad, Elizabeth; Borgen, Henning; Eskeland, Gunnar S.; Paalson, Christopher; Psaraftis, Harilaos; Turan, Osman.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 13, 3668, 04.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need to amend IMO's EEDI to include a threshold for performance in waves (realistic sea conditions) to achieve the desired GHG reductions

AU - Lindstad, Elizabeth

AU - Borgen, Henning

AU - Eskeland, Gunnar S.

AU - Paalson, Christopher

AU - Psaraftis, Harilaos

AU - Turan, Osman

PY - 2019/7/4

Y1 - 2019/7/4

N2 - The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has established the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) as the most important policy measure to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping. A vessel's EEDI is based on sea trials at delivery, and vessels cannot exceed a threshold for emitted CO2 per ton-mile, depending on vessel type and size. From other industries such as cars we have learnt that testing methods must reflect realistic operating conditions to deliver the desired emission reductions. Present sea-trial procedures for EEDI adjust to 'calm water conditions' only, as a comparative basis, despite calm sea being the exception at sea. We find that this adjustment procedure excessively rewards full bodied 'bulky' hulls which perform well in calm water conditions. In contrast, hull forms optimized with respect to performance in realistic sea-conditions are not rewarded with the current EEDI procedures. Our results indicate that without adjusting the testing cycle requirements to also include a threshold for performance in waves (real sea), the desired reductions will be short on targets and GHG emissions could potentially increase.

AB - The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has established the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) as the most important policy measure to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping. A vessel's EEDI is based on sea trials at delivery, and vessels cannot exceed a threshold for emitted CO2 per ton-mile, depending on vessel type and size. From other industries such as cars we have learnt that testing methods must reflect realistic operating conditions to deliver the desired emission reductions. Present sea-trial procedures for EEDI adjust to 'calm water conditions' only, as a comparative basis, despite calm sea being the exception at sea. We find that this adjustment procedure excessively rewards full bodied 'bulky' hulls which perform well in calm water conditions. In contrast, hull forms optimized with respect to performance in realistic sea-conditions are not rewarded with the current EEDI procedures. Our results indicate that without adjusting the testing cycle requirements to also include a threshold for performance in waves (real sea), the desired reductions will be short on targets and GHG emissions could potentially increase.

KW - EEDI

KW - IMO

KW - maritime transport

KW - performance in real sea

KW - sea trial test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068713110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

U2 - 10.3390/su11133668

DO - 10.3390/su11133668

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Sustainability

T2 - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 13

M1 - 3668

ER -