Abstract
This article engages a moral economy (ME) approach with mobilisation theory (MT), using Sayer’s concept of lay morality to examine how solidarity was articulated and developed during a hunger strike. It argues that subjective moral evaluations and the historical context influenced solidarity and the outcomes of the strike. To explore this, a theoretical engagement between ME and MT found that solidarity was based on strong moral evaluations by workers and union leaders within a historically informed moral economy. The article confirms the analytical value of theoretically engaging ME and MT to provide a more fertile ground for understanding solidarity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 96-117 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Economic and Industrial Democracy |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 14 Dec 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- hunger strike
- lay morality
- Mauritius
- mobilisation theory
- moral economy
- solidarity