Abstract
Although the low-template or stochastic threshold is in widespread use and is typically set to 150-200 rfu peak height, there has been no consideration on its determination and meaning. In this paper we propose a definition that is based upon the specific risk of wrongful designation of a heterozygous genotype as a homozygote which could lead to a false exclusion. Conversely, it is possible that a homozygote fa,a) could be designated as {a,F} where 'F is a 'wild card', and this could lead to increased risk of false inclusion. To determine these risk levels, we analysed an experimental dataset that exhibited extreme drop-out using logistic regression. The derived probabilities are employed in a graphical model to determine the relative risks of wrongful designations that may cause false inclusions and exclusions. The methods described in this paper provide a preliminary solution of risk evaluation for any DNA process that employs a stochastic threshold.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 104-111 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Forensic Science International: Genetics |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
Keywords
- STR
- extreme drop-out
- low-level-DNA (stochastic) threshold
- national DNA database
- low-copy-number
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold - Its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver