The Living with Dysarthria group for post-stroke dysarthria: the participant voice

Catherine MacKenzie, Shona Kelly, Gillian Paton, Marian Brady, Margaret Muir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Living withDysarthria group programme, devised for people with post-stroke dysarthia and family members, was piloted twice. Feedback from those who experience an intervention contributes to the evaluation of speech and language therapy programmes, giving the participant view of the intervention’s value and guiding
further developments. What feedback do participants in the Living with Dysarthria programme provide, informing on its perceived usefulness and guiding its future development? Nine people with chronic dysarthria following stroke and four family members who completed the Living with Dysarthria programme all contributed to Focus Group (FG) discussion, transcribed and thematically analysed, and completed an Anonymous Questionnaire Evaluation (AQE), comprising closed statements and open questions. An anonymous descriptive adjective selection task (ADAST) was also used. The varied forms of feedback provided complementary information. Thematic analysis of FG data and AQE open question responses were configured around programme benefits, programme structure and content, and programme practicalities. Benefits associated with participation included learning and insight, being supported by peers and professionals, and improved speech and confidence. These are consistent with the main programme elements of education, support and speech practice. All activities were seen as relevant and positively
received. Flexibility, recognition of and catering to individual needs were valued characteristics. The community location was approved by all.Most participants thought the format of eight weekly sessions of 2 h was appropriate. Responses to AQE closed statements provided almost unanimous confirmation of the very positive feedback
conveyed in FG discussions. The main response to suggested improvements in AQEs was that the number of sessions should be increased. Feedback indicated that for a few individuals there was negative reaction to some facts about stroke, home practice tasks were difficult to complete, the person with dysarthria/family member pair may not be the optimum combination for paired practice activities and pre-programme information should be extended. The ADAST showed that the programme was enjoyable, interesting stimulating and useful. Participant feedback indicates that group therapy, with family member participation, is a valid form of management for chronic post-stroke dysarthria. Education, peer and professional support, and speech practice are confirmed as relevant programme components. Consistent majority opinions were communicated in
different situations and via varied mediums. Some individuals expressed views relevant to their own needs, and these responses also inform future implementation of the Living with Dysarthria programme.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
Early online date18 Apr 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Dysarthria
stroke
Stroke
Focus Groups
Group
family member
Language Therapy
Speech Therapy
Professional Education
Group Psychotherapy
evaluation
group discussion
questionnaire
Learning
Education
group therapy
participation
Practice (Psychology)
Surveys and Questionnaires
education

Keywords

  • dysarthria
  • feedback
  • group therapy
  • stroke

Cite this

@article{9df82ea111044239813f6a0c7b65ed9e,
title = "The Living with Dysarthria group for post-stroke dysarthria: the participant voice",
abstract = "Background: The Living withDysarthria group programme, devised for people with post-stroke dysarthia and family members, was piloted twice. Feedback from those who experience an intervention contributes to the evaluation of speech and language therapy programmes, giving the participant view of the intervention’s value and guidingfurther developments. What feedback do participants in the Living with Dysarthria programme provide, informing on its perceived usefulness and guiding its future development? Nine people with chronic dysarthria following stroke and four family members who completed the Living with Dysarthria programme all contributed to Focus Group (FG) discussion, transcribed and thematically analysed, and completed an Anonymous Questionnaire Evaluation (AQE), comprising closed statements and open questions. An anonymous descriptive adjective selection task (ADAST) was also used. The varied forms of feedback provided complementary information. Thematic analysis of FG data and AQE open question responses were configured around programme benefits, programme structure and content, and programme practicalities. Benefits associated with participation included learning and insight, being supported by peers and professionals, and improved speech and confidence. These are consistent with the main programme elements of education, support and speech practice. All activities were seen as relevant and positivelyreceived. Flexibility, recognition of and catering to individual needs were valued characteristics. The community location was approved by all.Most participants thought the format of eight weekly sessions of 2 h was appropriate. Responses to AQE closed statements provided almost unanimous confirmation of the very positive feedbackconveyed in FG discussions. The main response to suggested improvements in AQEs was that the number of sessions should be increased. Feedback indicated that for a few individuals there was negative reaction to some facts about stroke, home practice tasks were difficult to complete, the person with dysarthria/family member pair may not be the optimum combination for paired practice activities and pre-programme information should be extended. The ADAST showed that the programme was enjoyable, interesting stimulating and useful. Participant feedback indicates that group therapy, with family member participation, is a valid form of management for chronic post-stroke dysarthria. Education, peer and professional support, and speech practice are confirmed as relevant programme components. Consistent majority opinions were communicated indifferent situations and via varied mediums. Some individuals expressed views relevant to their own needs, and these responses also inform future implementation of the Living with Dysarthria programme.",
keywords = "dysarthria, feedback, group therapy, stroke",
author = "Catherine MacKenzie and Shona Kelly and Gillian Paton and Marian Brady and Margaret Muir",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/1460-6984.12017",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders",
issn = "1368-2822",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Living with Dysarthria group for post-stroke dysarthria

T2 - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

AU - MacKenzie, Catherine

AU - Kelly, Shona

AU - Paton, Gillian

AU - Brady, Marian

AU - Muir, Margaret

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Background: The Living withDysarthria group programme, devised for people with post-stroke dysarthia and family members, was piloted twice. Feedback from those who experience an intervention contributes to the evaluation of speech and language therapy programmes, giving the participant view of the intervention’s value and guidingfurther developments. What feedback do participants in the Living with Dysarthria programme provide, informing on its perceived usefulness and guiding its future development? Nine people with chronic dysarthria following stroke and four family members who completed the Living with Dysarthria programme all contributed to Focus Group (FG) discussion, transcribed and thematically analysed, and completed an Anonymous Questionnaire Evaluation (AQE), comprising closed statements and open questions. An anonymous descriptive adjective selection task (ADAST) was also used. The varied forms of feedback provided complementary information. Thematic analysis of FG data and AQE open question responses were configured around programme benefits, programme structure and content, and programme practicalities. Benefits associated with participation included learning and insight, being supported by peers and professionals, and improved speech and confidence. These are consistent with the main programme elements of education, support and speech practice. All activities were seen as relevant and positivelyreceived. Flexibility, recognition of and catering to individual needs were valued characteristics. The community location was approved by all.Most participants thought the format of eight weekly sessions of 2 h was appropriate. Responses to AQE closed statements provided almost unanimous confirmation of the very positive feedbackconveyed in FG discussions. The main response to suggested improvements in AQEs was that the number of sessions should be increased. Feedback indicated that for a few individuals there was negative reaction to some facts about stroke, home practice tasks were difficult to complete, the person with dysarthria/family member pair may not be the optimum combination for paired practice activities and pre-programme information should be extended. The ADAST showed that the programme was enjoyable, interesting stimulating and useful. Participant feedback indicates that group therapy, with family member participation, is a valid form of management for chronic post-stroke dysarthria. Education, peer and professional support, and speech practice are confirmed as relevant programme components. Consistent majority opinions were communicated indifferent situations and via varied mediums. Some individuals expressed views relevant to their own needs, and these responses also inform future implementation of the Living with Dysarthria programme.

AB - Background: The Living withDysarthria group programme, devised for people with post-stroke dysarthia and family members, was piloted twice. Feedback from those who experience an intervention contributes to the evaluation of speech and language therapy programmes, giving the participant view of the intervention’s value and guidingfurther developments. What feedback do participants in the Living with Dysarthria programme provide, informing on its perceived usefulness and guiding its future development? Nine people with chronic dysarthria following stroke and four family members who completed the Living with Dysarthria programme all contributed to Focus Group (FG) discussion, transcribed and thematically analysed, and completed an Anonymous Questionnaire Evaluation (AQE), comprising closed statements and open questions. An anonymous descriptive adjective selection task (ADAST) was also used. The varied forms of feedback provided complementary information. Thematic analysis of FG data and AQE open question responses were configured around programme benefits, programme structure and content, and programme practicalities. Benefits associated with participation included learning and insight, being supported by peers and professionals, and improved speech and confidence. These are consistent with the main programme elements of education, support and speech practice. All activities were seen as relevant and positivelyreceived. Flexibility, recognition of and catering to individual needs were valued characteristics. The community location was approved by all.Most participants thought the format of eight weekly sessions of 2 h was appropriate. Responses to AQE closed statements provided almost unanimous confirmation of the very positive feedbackconveyed in FG discussions. The main response to suggested improvements in AQEs was that the number of sessions should be increased. Feedback indicated that for a few individuals there was negative reaction to some facts about stroke, home practice tasks were difficult to complete, the person with dysarthria/family member pair may not be the optimum combination for paired practice activities and pre-programme information should be extended. The ADAST showed that the programme was enjoyable, interesting stimulating and useful. Participant feedback indicates that group therapy, with family member participation, is a valid form of management for chronic post-stroke dysarthria. Education, peer and professional support, and speech practice are confirmed as relevant programme components. Consistent majority opinions were communicated indifferent situations and via varied mediums. Some individuals expressed views relevant to their own needs, and these responses also inform future implementation of the Living with Dysarthria programme.

KW - dysarthria

KW - feedback

KW - group therapy

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880846825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1460-6984.12017

DO - 10.1111/1460-6984.12017

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

JF - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

SN - 1368-2822

ER -