The landscape of UK child protection research between 2010 and 2014: disciplines, topics, and types of maltreatment

Francesca Soliman, Kirsteen Mackay, Estelle Clayton, Andressa Gadda, Christine Jones, Anna Anderson, Derek Jones, Julie Taylor

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper draws on the results of a commissioned systematic map of UK child protection empirical research published between 2010 and 2014. It analyses current patterns in child protection research in relation to three variables – disciplinary background of authors, types of maltreatment examined, and focus of the research – and considers the relationship between these. It finds first authors’ disciplines to be reliable indicators of both the focus and topic of the research, with the dominant fields of psychology, medicine, and social work addressing respectively the long term outcomes of sexual abuse, the short term outcomes of physical abuse, and the care system’s response to child maltreatment. The proportion of research dedicated to specific types of maltreatment appears to depend on factors other than their real-world prevalence. Instead, definitional issues and ease of access to research participants appearing to be more influential in determining the topic of the research. UK child protection research appears to show narrow multidisciplinary interaction and little focus on preventative or ameliorative interventions. The development of a coordinated national strategy adopting an interdisciplinary approach in the design and commissioning of child protection research could help maximise research efforts by reducing duplication and potentially facilitating the emergence of more innovative directions.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages51-61
    Number of pages11
    JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
    Volume65
    Early online date2 Apr 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

    child protection
    maltreatment
    Research
    Empirical Research
    Child Abuse
    Sex Offenses
    Social Work
    sexual violence
    empirical research
    social work
    abuse
    psychology
    Medicine
    medicine
    Psychology
    interaction

    Keywords

    • child protection research
    • child maltreatment
    • mapping review
    • disciplines
    • looked after children

    Cite this

    Soliman, Francesca ; Mackay, Kirsteen ; Clayton, Estelle ; Gadda, Andressa ; Jones, Christine ; Anderson, Anna ; Jones, Derek ; Taylor, Julie. / The landscape of UK child protection research between 2010 and 2014 : disciplines, topics, and types of maltreatment. In: Children and Youth Services Review. 2016 ; Vol. 65. pp. 51-61.
    @article{907339649075463fbd8df98001af5863,
    title = "The landscape of UK child protection research between 2010 and 2014: disciplines, topics, and types of maltreatment",
    abstract = "This paper draws on the results of a commissioned systematic map of UK child protection empirical research published between 2010 and 2014. It analyses current patterns in child protection research in relation to three variables – disciplinary background of authors, types of maltreatment examined, and focus of the research – and considers the relationship between these. It finds first authors’ disciplines to be reliable indicators of both the focus and topic of the research, with the dominant fields of psychology, medicine, and social work addressing respectively the long term outcomes of sexual abuse, the short term outcomes of physical abuse, and the care system’s response to child maltreatment. The proportion of research dedicated to specific types of maltreatment appears to depend on factors other than their real-world prevalence. Instead, definitional issues and ease of access to research participants appearing to be more influential in determining the topic of the research. UK child protection research appears to show narrow multidisciplinary interaction and little focus on preventative or ameliorative interventions. The development of a coordinated national strategy adopting an interdisciplinary approach in the design and commissioning of child protection research could help maximise research efforts by reducing duplication and potentially facilitating the emergence of more innovative directions.",
    keywords = "child protection research, child maltreatment, mapping review, disciplines, looked after children",
    author = "Francesca Soliman and Kirsteen Mackay and Estelle Clayton and Andressa Gadda and Christine Jones and Anna Anderson and Derek Jones and Julie Taylor",
    year = "2016",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.021",
    language = "English",
    volume = "65",
    pages = "51--61",
    journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
    issn = "0190-7409",

    }

    The landscape of UK child protection research between 2010 and 2014 : disciplines, topics, and types of maltreatment. / Soliman, Francesca; Mackay, Kirsteen; Clayton, Estelle; Gadda, Andressa; Jones, Christine; Anderson, Anna; Jones, Derek; Taylor, Julie.

    In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 65, 01.06.2016, p. 51-61.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The landscape of UK child protection research between 2010 and 2014

    T2 - Children and Youth Services Review

    AU - Soliman, Francesca

    AU - Mackay, Kirsteen

    AU - Clayton, Estelle

    AU - Gadda, Andressa

    AU - Jones, Christine

    AU - Anderson, Anna

    AU - Jones, Derek

    AU - Taylor, Julie

    PY - 2016/6/1

    Y1 - 2016/6/1

    N2 - This paper draws on the results of a commissioned systematic map of UK child protection empirical research published between 2010 and 2014. It analyses current patterns in child protection research in relation to three variables – disciplinary background of authors, types of maltreatment examined, and focus of the research – and considers the relationship between these. It finds first authors’ disciplines to be reliable indicators of both the focus and topic of the research, with the dominant fields of psychology, medicine, and social work addressing respectively the long term outcomes of sexual abuse, the short term outcomes of physical abuse, and the care system’s response to child maltreatment. The proportion of research dedicated to specific types of maltreatment appears to depend on factors other than their real-world prevalence. Instead, definitional issues and ease of access to research participants appearing to be more influential in determining the topic of the research. UK child protection research appears to show narrow multidisciplinary interaction and little focus on preventative or ameliorative interventions. The development of a coordinated national strategy adopting an interdisciplinary approach in the design and commissioning of child protection research could help maximise research efforts by reducing duplication and potentially facilitating the emergence of more innovative directions.

    AB - This paper draws on the results of a commissioned systematic map of UK child protection empirical research published between 2010 and 2014. It analyses current patterns in child protection research in relation to three variables – disciplinary background of authors, types of maltreatment examined, and focus of the research – and considers the relationship between these. It finds first authors’ disciplines to be reliable indicators of both the focus and topic of the research, with the dominant fields of psychology, medicine, and social work addressing respectively the long term outcomes of sexual abuse, the short term outcomes of physical abuse, and the care system’s response to child maltreatment. The proportion of research dedicated to specific types of maltreatment appears to depend on factors other than their real-world prevalence. Instead, definitional issues and ease of access to research participants appearing to be more influential in determining the topic of the research. UK child protection research appears to show narrow multidisciplinary interaction and little focus on preventative or ameliorative interventions. The development of a coordinated national strategy adopting an interdisciplinary approach in the design and commissioning of child protection research could help maximise research efforts by reducing duplication and potentially facilitating the emergence of more innovative directions.

    KW - child protection research

    KW - child maltreatment

    KW - mapping review

    KW - disciplines

    KW - looked after children

    UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01907409

    U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.021

    DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.021

    M3 - Article

    VL - 65

    SP - 51

    EP - 61

    JO - Children and Youth Services Review

    JF - Children and Youth Services Review

    SN - 0190-7409

    ER -