The institutionalisation of unaccountability: loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse

Pablo Archel, Javier Husillos, Crawford Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reports on an in-depth empirical study into recent government-led Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives in Spain. It is found, based on interviews and document analysis, that processes of stakeholder consultation relating to these initiatives are characterised by debate and a plurality of different viewpoints. However, this polyphony can be contrasted sharply with the institutional outcomes of these processes. Institutional outcomes represent the viewpoints of only a subset of the actors involved in the stakeholder consultation processes. It is consequently inferred that stakeholder consultation processes serve problematic functions: on one level, these processes legitimise dominant discourses on CSR by giving the impression that the latter are the outcome of a democratic dialogue that is free from power relations; on another level, these processes themselves show to heretic social actors the futility of their heresy and thus encourage those actors to actively adopt the dominant discourse. We conclude that business capture of Corporate Social Responsibility is ingrained into institutional processes in that domain. This raises serious questions regarding the potential for civil society actors to engage with and move the signifier of Corporate Social Responsibility in a more challenging direction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-343
Number of pages17
JournalAccounting, Organizations and Society
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Keywords

  • institutionalisation
  • unaccountability
  • corporate social responsibility
  • discourse
  • spain
  • institutional processes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The institutionalisation of unaccountability: loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this