The influence of prosthesis size and design on exercise dynamics after aortic valve replacement

Niaz F. Ali, Vinod S. Mahadevan, Andrew Muir, Christine Maguire, David Young, Gianfranco Campalani, Norman P S Campbell, Mark H D Danton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aim of the study: Residual gradient following aortic valve replacement (AVR) may adversely affect clinical outcome. The size and design of the valve may influence these characteristics. The study aim was to determine the influence of prosthesis physical size and leaflet design on hemodynamic performance after mechanical AVR. Methods: After AVR, two patient groups with a range of valve sizes were studied. Group 1 patients (n = 19) each received a monoleaflet valve; group 2 patients (n = 18) each received a bileaflet valve. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at rest and after graded bicycle ergometry to assess prosthetic valve parameters, including mean and peak transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area (EOA). Results: Transprosthetic gradients (mean and peak) measured at rest, maximum exercise and 3- min recovery were related to indexed geometric orifice area (IGOA) by an exponential decay function, with no significant advantage for either valve design. However, in valve sizes ≤25 mm the bileaflet valves demonstrated lower gradients, both at rest and under exercise conditions (mean gradient during exercise, bileaflet versus monoleaflet 19.9 ± 7.2 mmHg versus 25.6 ± 6.3 mmHg, p = 0.01). Similarly, EOAs were larger in the bileaflet group when equivalent GOAs ≤2.5 cm2 were compared (EOA: bileaflet versus monoleaflet 1.51 ± 0.33 cm2 versus 1.14 ± 0.26 cm2, p = 0.018). The total work performed correlated with prosthesis diameter (r2 = 0.81, p = 0.037) and was not influenced by valve design. Conclusion: The hemodynamic performance of mechanical aortic valves, including transprosthetic gradient and maximum exercise work performed, related principally to the prosthesis physical size. However, within the smaller valve sizes, the bileaflet design appeared to offer hemodynamic advantages.

LanguageEnglish
Pages755-762
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Heart Valve Disease
Volume15
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Prosthesis Design
Aortic Valve
Exercise
Prostheses and Implants
Hemodynamics
Ergometry
Echocardiography

Keywords

  • prosthesis size
  • prosthesis design
  • aortic valve replacement

Cite this

Ali, Niaz F. ; Mahadevan, Vinod S. ; Muir, Andrew ; Maguire, Christine ; Young, David ; Campalani, Gianfranco ; Campbell, Norman P S ; Danton, Mark H D. / The influence of prosthesis size and design on exercise dynamics after aortic valve replacement. In: Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 755-762.
@article{aadc1eb31a1f4827b6c446c560afe198,
title = "The influence of prosthesis size and design on exercise dynamics after aortic valve replacement",
abstract = "Background and aim of the study: Residual gradient following aortic valve replacement (AVR) may adversely affect clinical outcome. The size and design of the valve may influence these characteristics. The study aim was to determine the influence of prosthesis physical size and leaflet design on hemodynamic performance after mechanical AVR. Methods: After AVR, two patient groups with a range of valve sizes were studied. Group 1 patients (n = 19) each received a monoleaflet valve; group 2 patients (n = 18) each received a bileaflet valve. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at rest and after graded bicycle ergometry to assess prosthetic valve parameters, including mean and peak transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area (EOA). Results: Transprosthetic gradients (mean and peak) measured at rest, maximum exercise and 3- min recovery were related to indexed geometric orifice area (IGOA) by an exponential decay function, with no significant advantage for either valve design. However, in valve sizes ≤25 mm the bileaflet valves demonstrated lower gradients, both at rest and under exercise conditions (mean gradient during exercise, bileaflet versus monoleaflet 19.9 ± 7.2 mmHg versus 25.6 ± 6.3 mmHg, p = 0.01). Similarly, EOAs were larger in the bileaflet group when equivalent GOAs ≤2.5 cm2 were compared (EOA: bileaflet versus monoleaflet 1.51 ± 0.33 cm2 versus 1.14 ± 0.26 cm2, p = 0.018). The total work performed correlated with prosthesis diameter (r2 = 0.81, p = 0.037) and was not influenced by valve design. Conclusion: The hemodynamic performance of mechanical aortic valves, including transprosthetic gradient and maximum exercise work performed, related principally to the prosthesis physical size. However, within the smaller valve sizes, the bileaflet design appeared to offer hemodynamic advantages.",
keywords = "prosthesis size, prosthesis design, aortic valve replacement",
author = "Ali, {Niaz F.} and Mahadevan, {Vinod S.} and Andrew Muir and Christine Maguire and David Young and Gianfranco Campalani and Campbell, {Norman P S} and Danton, {Mark H D}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "755--762",
journal = "Journal of Heart Valve Disease",
issn = "0966-8519",
publisher = "ICR Publishers Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Ali, NF, Mahadevan, VS, Muir, A, Maguire, C, Young, D, Campalani, G, Campbell, NPS & Danton, MHD 2006, 'The influence of prosthesis size and design on exercise dynamics after aortic valve replacement' Journal of Heart Valve Disease, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 755-762.

The influence of prosthesis size and design on exercise dynamics after aortic valve replacement. / Ali, Niaz F.; Mahadevan, Vinod S.; Muir, Andrew; Maguire, Christine; Young, David; Campalani, Gianfranco; Campbell, Norman P S; Danton, Mark H D.

In: Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 15, No. 6, 01.11.2006, p. 755-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of prosthesis size and design on exercise dynamics after aortic valve replacement

AU - Ali, Niaz F.

AU - Mahadevan, Vinod S.

AU - Muir, Andrew

AU - Maguire, Christine

AU - Young, David

AU - Campalani, Gianfranco

AU - Campbell, Norman P S

AU - Danton, Mark H D

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Background and aim of the study: Residual gradient following aortic valve replacement (AVR) may adversely affect clinical outcome. The size and design of the valve may influence these characteristics. The study aim was to determine the influence of prosthesis physical size and leaflet design on hemodynamic performance after mechanical AVR. Methods: After AVR, two patient groups with a range of valve sizes were studied. Group 1 patients (n = 19) each received a monoleaflet valve; group 2 patients (n = 18) each received a bileaflet valve. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at rest and after graded bicycle ergometry to assess prosthetic valve parameters, including mean and peak transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area (EOA). Results: Transprosthetic gradients (mean and peak) measured at rest, maximum exercise and 3- min recovery were related to indexed geometric orifice area (IGOA) by an exponential decay function, with no significant advantage for either valve design. However, in valve sizes ≤25 mm the bileaflet valves demonstrated lower gradients, both at rest and under exercise conditions (mean gradient during exercise, bileaflet versus monoleaflet 19.9 ± 7.2 mmHg versus 25.6 ± 6.3 mmHg, p = 0.01). Similarly, EOAs were larger in the bileaflet group when equivalent GOAs ≤2.5 cm2 were compared (EOA: bileaflet versus monoleaflet 1.51 ± 0.33 cm2 versus 1.14 ± 0.26 cm2, p = 0.018). The total work performed correlated with prosthesis diameter (r2 = 0.81, p = 0.037) and was not influenced by valve design. Conclusion: The hemodynamic performance of mechanical aortic valves, including transprosthetic gradient and maximum exercise work performed, related principally to the prosthesis physical size. However, within the smaller valve sizes, the bileaflet design appeared to offer hemodynamic advantages.

AB - Background and aim of the study: Residual gradient following aortic valve replacement (AVR) may adversely affect clinical outcome. The size and design of the valve may influence these characteristics. The study aim was to determine the influence of prosthesis physical size and leaflet design on hemodynamic performance after mechanical AVR. Methods: After AVR, two patient groups with a range of valve sizes were studied. Group 1 patients (n = 19) each received a monoleaflet valve; group 2 patients (n = 18) each received a bileaflet valve. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at rest and after graded bicycle ergometry to assess prosthetic valve parameters, including mean and peak transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area (EOA). Results: Transprosthetic gradients (mean and peak) measured at rest, maximum exercise and 3- min recovery were related to indexed geometric orifice area (IGOA) by an exponential decay function, with no significant advantage for either valve design. However, in valve sizes ≤25 mm the bileaflet valves demonstrated lower gradients, both at rest and under exercise conditions (mean gradient during exercise, bileaflet versus monoleaflet 19.9 ± 7.2 mmHg versus 25.6 ± 6.3 mmHg, p = 0.01). Similarly, EOAs were larger in the bileaflet group when equivalent GOAs ≤2.5 cm2 were compared (EOA: bileaflet versus monoleaflet 1.51 ± 0.33 cm2 versus 1.14 ± 0.26 cm2, p = 0.018). The total work performed correlated with prosthesis diameter (r2 = 0.81, p = 0.037) and was not influenced by valve design. Conclusion: The hemodynamic performance of mechanical aortic valves, including transprosthetic gradient and maximum exercise work performed, related principally to the prosthesis physical size. However, within the smaller valve sizes, the bileaflet design appeared to offer hemodynamic advantages.

KW - prosthesis size

KW - prosthesis design

KW - aortic valve replacement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751441079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.icr-heart.com/?cid=1635

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 755

EP - 762

JO - Journal of Heart Valve Disease

T2 - Journal of Heart Valve Disease

JF - Journal of Heart Valve Disease

SN - 0966-8519

IS - 6

ER -